JRM Vol.24 No.5 pp. 811-819
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2012.p0811


Relation Between Blood Pressure Estimated by Pulse Wave Velocity and Directly Measured Arterial Pressure

Tsukasa Inajima, Yasushi Imai, Masaki Shuzo,
Guillaume Lopez, Shintaro Yanagimoto, Katsuya Iijima,
Hiroyuki Morita, Ryozo Nagai, Naoki Yahagi,
and Ichiro Yamada

The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan

March 9, 2012
July 4, 2012
October 20, 2012
pulse wave velocity, hypertension, blood pressure monitoring, wearable sensor, metabolic syndrome
Hypertension is the strongest risk factor in cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases among the Japanese. Even daily variations in blood pressure may become a risk, and repeated blood pressure measurement is recommended. Conventional Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM), however,may cause discomfort to examinees because they have to have their arms compressed and carry the monitor itself. The number of ABPMmeasurements is limited to about 1 every 15–30 minutes. We therefore attempted, working with medical and engineering teams, to develop a wearable blood pressure sensor that would place less burden on examinees, be less influenced by physical movement, and be usable for continuous blood pressure measurement. We then examined the clinical practicality of the sensor. We modified the existing Moens-Korteweg blood-pressure equation and developed a new systolic blood pressure calculation system that used electrocardiography and ear-lobe pulse waves because the ear lobe would receive little influence from physical movement. We chose three clinical cases from among intensive care unit subjects. We not only estimated their blood pressure using the systemwe developed but also measured arterial pressure directly with an intravascular catheter to see how estimated blood pressure followed actual changes in blood pressure and to evaluate the accuracy of estimated blood pressure. When systolic blood pressure estimated by using the pulse wave velocity method was compared with direct blood pressure measurement, we found that the method captured trends in blood pressure variations correctly. The difference was within ±10 mmHgfor all of the cases. In a comparison using the Bland-Altman method for the three clinical cases, the average difference was –0.4 mmHg, –1.0 mmHg, and –1.7 mmHg and standard deviation was 4.2 mmHg, 4.8 mmHg, and 4.3 mmHg, respectively, which indicated good agreement. Introducing such wearable blood pressure sensors into daily medical practice gets detailed information on continuous blood pressure variation while examinees move freely and the resulting information is used for better quality control of adult diseases. It is also expected that wearable blood pressure sensors can be used in emergency medical cases, in intensive care, and at remote sites.
Cite this article as:
T. Inajima, Y. Imai, M. Shuzo, G. Lopez, S. Yanagimoto, K. Iijima, H. Morita, R. Nagai, N. Yahagi, and I. Yamada, “Relation Between Blood Pressure Estimated by Pulse Wave Velocity and Directly Measured Arterial Pressure,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.24 No.5, pp. 811-819, 2012.
Data files:
  1. [1] NIPPON DATA Research Group, “Impact of elevated blood pressure on mortality from all causes, cardiovascular diseases, heart disease and stroke among Japanese: 14 year follow-up of randomly selected population from Japanese,” Nippon data 80, J. Hum. Hypertens, Vol.17, pp. 851-857, 2003.
  2. [2] Health Japan 21 Plan Study Committee and Health Japan 21 Plan Development Committee, “National Health Promotion in the 21st Century (Health Japan21),” Japan Health Promotion Fitness Foundation, p. 177, 2000.
  3. [3] Society for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan, “Dai 5ji Junkanki Shikkan Kiso Chousa Kekka (Summary of the Fifth National Survey on Cardiovascular Disease: Full Coverage of the Results of Fifth National Survey of Cardiovascular Survey),” Tokyo, Chuo-Hoki Publishing, pp. 291-295, 2003 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] J. A. Staessen, L. Thijs, R. Fagard, E. T. O’Brien, D. Clement, P.W. de Leeuw, G. Mancia, C. Nachev, P. Palatini, G. Parati, J. Tuomilehto, and J. Webster, “For the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators: Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Using Conventional vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Older Patients With Systolic Hypertension,” JAMA, Vol.282, pp. 539-546, 1999.
  5. [5] The Japanese Society of Hypertension, “The Guideline for theManagement of Hypertension,” Life Science Publishing Co., Ltd. pp. 8-13, 2009.
  6. [6] Y. Imai, K. Otsuka, Y. Kawano, K. Shimada, H. Hayashi, O. Tochikubo, M. Miyakawa, and K. Fukiyama, “Japanese Society of Hypertension,” Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure at home,” Hypertens Res., Vol.10, pp. 771-782, 2003.
  7. [7] T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella, “Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research,” Hypertension, Vol.45, pp. 142-161, 2005.
  8. [8] G. Lopez, M. Shuzo, H. Ushida, K. Hidaka, S. Yanagimoto, Y. Imai, A. Kosaka, J. J. Delaunay, and I. Yamada, “Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in Daily Life,” J. of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, Vol.4, pp. 179-186, 2010.
  9. [9] A. Yamashina, H. Tomiyama, K. Takeda, H. Tsuda, T. Arai, K. Hirose, Y. Koji, S. Hori, and Y. Yamamoto, “Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement,” Hypertens Res., Vol.3, pp. 359-364, 2002.
  10. [10] K. Iijima, Y. Kameyama, M. Akishita, Y. Ouchi, S. Yanagimoto, Y. Imai, N. Yahagi, G. Lopez, M. Shuzo, and I. Yamada, “Validity and Usefulness of ‘Wearable Blood Pressure Sensing’ for Detection of Inappropriate Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in the Elderly Impact of Cognitive Function and Stress Response,” Trans. of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Vol.27, pp. 40-45, 2012.
  11. [11] R. Ochiai et al., “The Relationship between Modified Pulse Wave Transit Time and Cardiovascular Changes in Isoflurane Anesthetized Dogs,” J. of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Vol.15, pp. 493-501, 1999.
  12. [12] M. J. Roman, R. B. Devereux, J. R. Kizer, P. M. Okin, E. T. Lee, W. Wang, J. G. Umans, D. Calhoun, and B. V. Howard, “High Central Pulse Pressure Is Independently Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., Vol.54, pp. 1730-1734, 2009.
  13. [13] J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” Lancet., Vol.8476, pp. 307-310, 1986.
  14. [14] D. B. McCombie, P. A. Shaltis, A. T. Reisner, and H. H. Asada, “Adaptive hydrostatic blood pressure calibration: Development of a wearable, autonomous pulse wave velocity blood pressure monitor,” Proc. Conf. IEEE EMBS 2007, pp. 370-373. 2007.
  15. [15] S. R. Sinha and M. Barry, “Health Technologies and Innovation in the Global Health Arena,” N. Engl. J. Med., Vol.365, pp. 779-782, 2011.
  16. [16] M. Ogawa, S. Sudo, M. Kurotaki, and K. Takahata, “Domestic Networks: Current State and Outlook for the Future,” Medical Imaging Technology, Vol.22, pp. 7-12, 2004.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jun. 03, 2024