JACIII Vol.18 No.4 pp. 616-623
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2014.p0616


Influence of Payoff in Meta-Rewards Game

Fujio Toriumi*, Hitoshi Yamamoto**, and Isamu Okada***

*Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

**Faculty of Business Administration, Rissho University, 3-2-16 Osaki, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8602, Japan

***Faculty of Business Administration, Soka University, 1-236 Tangi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-8577, Japan

July 18, 2013
March 10, 2014
July 20, 2014
generalized metanorms game, agent-based simulation, public goods game, social media

In this paper, we analyze a meta-rewards game which is part of a generalized metanorms game. We theoretically analyze the game and conduct computer simulations on it. We clarify the payoff structure as to the benefit and the cost of reward and meta-reward actions. Whereas the benefit of a meta-reward, which is a rewarding action for the other rewarding actions, should be greater than its cost, it should not be much greater than the benefit of a rewarding action for other cooperative actions. This insight can be applied to the actions of users of social media, and we propose a set of policies for managers of social media services.

  1. [1] A. Chaudhuri, “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature,” Experimental Economics, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 47-83, 2011.
  2. [2] M. A. Nowak, “Evolving cooperation,” J. of Theoretical Biology, Vol.299, pp. 1-8, 2012.
  3. [3] T. Fujio, Y. Hitoshi, and O. Isamu, “Why do people use Social Media? – Agent-based simulation and population dynamics analysis of the evolution of cooperation in social media,” 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2012), electronic Proc., 2012.
  4. [4] R. Axelrod, “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms,” American Political Science Review, Vol.80, No.4, pp. 1095-1111, 1986.
  5. [5] Y. Ahn, S. Han, H. Kwak, S. Moon, and H. Jeong, “Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services,” Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 835-844, 2007.
  6. [6] F. Toriumi, I. Okada, H. Yamamoto, H. Suwa, K. Izumi, and Y. Hashimoto, “Classification of Social Network Sites based on Network Indexes and Communication Patterns,” Proc. of Int.Workshop on Social Web Mining Co-located with IJCAI2011, 2011.
  7. [7] H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon, “What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?,” Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 591-600, ACM, 2010.
  8. [8] A. Java, T. Finin, X. Song, and B. Tseng, “Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities,” Proc. of the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007, 2007.
  9. [9] F. Toriumi and K. Ishii, “Simulation of Encouragement Methods for SNS based on User Behavior Model,” Proc. of 3rd World Congress on Social Simulation, 2010.
  10. [10] A. Miura and K. Yamashita, “Psychological and Social Influences on Blog Writing: An Online Survey of Blog Authors in Japan,” J. of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 1452-1471, 2007.
  11. [11] Q. Hua and S. Craig, “Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs,” J. of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 1452-1471, 2007.
  12. [12] M. Lahiri and M. Cebrian, “The Genetic Algorithm as a General Diffusion Model for Social Networks,” Proc. of the 24th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-10), pp. 494-499, 2010.
  13. [13] L. Sampaio, J. Varajao, E. S. Pires, and P. d. Moura Oliveira, “Diffusion of Innovation Simulation Using an Evolutionary Algorithm,” Trans. on Computational Science XXI, pp. 46-63, 2013.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 20, 2017