single-rb.php

JRM Vol.36 No.6 pp. 1458-1467
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2024.p1458
(2024)

Paper:

Grasping of Cylindrical Structures Using an Underwater Snake Robot Without Force/Torque Sensors and Actuator Waterproofing

Atsushi Kakogawa ORCID Icon, Shah Darshankumar Rajendrakumar, and Yuto Iwasaki

Department of Robotics, Ritsumeikan University
1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan

Received:
June 24, 2024
Accepted:
September 11, 2024
Published:
December 20, 2024
Keywords:
underwater robot, snake robot, sensorless force control, interactive task
Abstract

This paper presents an underwater snake robot composed of submersible actuators designed for minimal friction, a lubricant-free gear reducer, and no waterproof sealing. This makes it suitable for direct exposure to water. In particular, this paper focuses on underwater interactive tasks with an object. Static force analysis for straightforward tasks, such as the wrapping of a pole structure, is conducted. Experiments were performed to evaluate the snake robot outside a water environment. The results indicated that the static model was valid, although the errors were not negligible. The potential of executing various tasks with this sensorless underwater snake robot, such as wrapping around the pole and its collection or turning on/off a lever underwater, is presented.

Assembled underwater snake robot

Assembled underwater snake robot

Cite this article as:
A. Kakogawa, S. Rajendrakumar, and Y. Iwasaki, “Grasping of Cylindrical Structures Using an Underwater Snake Robot Without Force/Torque Sensors and Actuator Waterproofing,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.36 No.6, pp. 1458-1467, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. Hirose, “Biologically inspired robots: Snake-Like Locomotors and Manipulators,” Oxford University Press, 1993.
  2. [2] B. L. Southall, A. E. Bowles, W. T. Ellison, J. J. Finneran, R. L. Gentry, C. R. Greene Jr, D. Kastak, D. R. Ketten, J. H. Miller, P. E. Nachtigall et al., “Marine mammal noise-exposure criteria: Initial scientific recommendations,” Bioacoustics, Vol.17, Issues 1-3, pp. 273-275, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753846
  3. [3] R. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Cheng, and M. Tan, “Development and motion control of biomimetic underwater robots: A survey,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, Vol.52, Issue 2, pp. 833-844, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3004862
  4. [4] S. Chigisaki, M. Mori, H. Yamada, and S. Hirose, “Design and control of amphibious snake-like robot “ACM-R5”,” Proc. of JSME annual Conf. on Robotics and Mechatronics (Robomec2005), 2005 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] E. Kelasidi, P. Liljebäck, K. Y. Pettersen, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Experimental investigation of efficient locomotion of underwater snake robots for lateral undulation and eel-like motion patterns,” Robotics and Biomimetics, Vol.2, Article No.8, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40638-015-0029-4
  6. [6] G. Marani, S. K. Choi, and J. Yuh, “Underwater autonomous manipulation for intervention missions AUVs,” Ocean Engineering, Vol.36, Issue 1, pp. 15-23, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.007
  7. [7] D. Rollinson, Y. Bilgen, B. Brown, F. Enner, S. Ford, C. Layton, J. Rembisz, M. Schwerin, A. Willig, P. Velagapudi, and H. Choset, “Design and architecture of a series elastic snake robot,” Proc. of 2014 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4630-4636, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2014.6943219
  8. [8] P. Liljebäck, Ø. Stavdahl, K. Y. Pettersen, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Mamba – A waterproof snake robot with tactile sensing,” Proc. of 2014 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 294-301, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2014.6942575
  9. [9] B. A. Elsayed, T. Takemori, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Mobile manipulation using a snake robot in a helical gait,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.27, Issue 5, pp. 2600-2611, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2021.3114168
  10. [10] T. Takemori, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Ladder climbing with a snake robot,” Proc. of 2018 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594411
  11. [11] E. Kelasidi, K. Y. Pettersen, J. T. Gravdahl, and P. Liljebäck, “Modeling of underwater snake robots,” Proc. of 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4540-4547, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907522
  12. [12] A. Zhang, S. Ma, B. Li, M. Wang, X. Guo, and Y. Wang, “Adaptive controller design for underwater snake robot with unmatched uncertainties,” Science China Information Sciences, Vol.59, Article No.052205, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5421-8
  13. [13] S. D. Rajendrakumar, A. Kakogawa, and S. Ma, “An Underwater Snake Robot that Does Not Consider Actuators’ Waterproof: Design and Primary Experiments,” Proc. of 2023 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 226-231, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO58561.2023.10354774
  14. [14] Z. Huang, S. Ma, Z. Lin, K. Zhu, P. Wang, R. Ahmed, C. Ren, and H. Marvi, “Impact of Caudal Fin Geometry on The Swimming Performance of a Snake-like Robot,” Ocean Engineering, Vol.245, Article No.110372, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110372
  15. [15] E. Kelasidi, A. M. Kohl, K. Y. Pettersen, B. H. Hoffmann, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Experimental Investigation of Locomotion Efficiency and Path-following for Underwater Snake Robots with and without a Caudal Fin,” Annual Reviews in Control, Vol.46, pp. 281-294, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.10.001
  16. [16] A. Kakogawa and S. Ma, “Design of a Multilink-articulated Wheeled Pipeline Inspection Robot using Only Passive Elastic Joints,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.32, Issue 1, pp. 37-50, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1393348

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jan. 08, 2025