single-rb.php

JRM Vol.36 No.4 pp. 918-927
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2024.p0918
(2024)

Paper:

Pedestrian’s Avoidance Behavior Characteristics Against Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicles for Smooth Avoidance

Ryunosuke Harada* ORCID Icon, Hiroshi Yoshitake* ORCID Icon, and Motoki Shino**

*The University of Tokyo
5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8563, Japan

**Tokyo Institute of Technology
2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan

Received:
April 24, 2023
Accepted:
May 21, 2024
Published:
August 20, 2024
Keywords:
pedestrian avoidance, personal mobility vehicle, autonomous navigation, smooth avoidance
Abstract

Autonomous personal mobility vehicles (PMVs), such as electric wheelchairs, are meant to drive through pedestrian spaces. Cooperative pedestrian avoidance by PMVs is necessary in these spaces to maintain smooth traffic. Previous studies suggested that PMVs can avoid pedestrians on a shorter path without compromising each other’s acceptability. This avoidance can be realized by understanding how pedestrians react to the behavior of PMVs and considering those characteristics in the autonomous navigation of PMVs. In this study, the characteristics of pedestrian’s avoidance behavior were investigated. Experiments were conducted to understand the influence of the parameters of the PMV’s avoidance behavior on pedestrians. Results showed that the angular velocity of the PMV during avoidance affects the pedestrian’s avoidance width and tolerance against the PMV’s behavior. These results suggest that it is possible to avoid pedestrians in smaller avoidance spaces by controlling the angular velocity of the PMV and maintaining smooth traffic.

Concept of smooth avoidance method

Concept of smooth avoidance method

Cite this article as:
R. Harada, H. Yoshitake, and M. Shino, “Pedestrian’s Avoidance Behavior Characteristics Against Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicles for Smooth Avoidance,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.36 No.4, pp. 918-927, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] A. Brandt, S. Iwarsson, and A. Stahle, “Older People’s Use of Powered Wheelchairs for Activity and Participation,” J. of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.36, No.2, pp. 70-77, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970310017432
  2. [2] H. Yoshida, M. Omae, and T. Wada, “Toward Next Active Safety Technology of Intelligent Vehicle,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.27, No.6, pp. 610-616, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2015.p0610
  3. [3] H. Darweesh, E. Takeuchi, K. Takeda, Y. Ninomiya, A. Sujiwo, L. Y. Morales, N. Akai, T. Tomizawa, and S. Kato, “Open Source Integrated Planner for Autonomous Navigation in Highly Dynamic Environments,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.4, pp. 668-684, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0668
  4. [4] T. Suzuki, M. Kitamura, Y. Amano, and N. Kubo, “Autonomous Navigation of a Mobile Robot Based on GNSS/DR Integration in Outdoor Environments,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.26, No.2, pp. 214-224, 2014. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2014.p0214
  5. [5] K. Mokhtari, A. Ayub, V. Surendran, and A. R. Wagner, “Pedestrian Density Based Path Recognition and Risk Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles,” Proc. of 2020 29th IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 517-524, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223554
  6. [6] A. Rouchitsas and H. Alm, “External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.10, Article No.2757, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02757
  7. [7] A. Rasouli and K. J. Tsotsos, “Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice,” IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol.21, Issue 3, pp. 900-918, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817
  8. [8] S. Deb, J. L. Strawderman, and W. D. Carruth, “Investigating Pedestrian Suggestions for External Features on Fully Autonomous Vehicles: A Virtual Reality Experiment,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol.59, pp. 135-149, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016
  9. [9] Y. Isono, H. Yoshitake, and M. Shino, “Passenger’s Comfort Recognition During Autonomous Navigation of Personal Mobility Vehicles in Crowded Pedestrian Spaces,” Proc. of 17th Int. Joint Conf. on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP’2022), Vol.2, pp. 58-67, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010849700003124
  10. [10] C. Liu, Y. Ooeda, and T. Sumi, “A Model for Pedestrian Movement With Obstacle Vision Using Personal Space Concept,” J. Infrastruct. Plan. Manag. D, Vol.64, No.4, pp. 513-524, 2008 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejd.64.513
  11. [11] T. Q. Pham, C. Nakagawa, A. Shintani, and T. Ito, “Evaluation of the Effects of a Personal Mobility Vehicle on Multiple Pedestrians Using Personal Space,” IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol.16, Issue 4, pp. 2028-2037, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2388219
  12. [12] P. Trautman and A. Krause, “Unfreezing the Robot: Navigation in Dense, Interacting Crowds,” Proc. of 2010 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 797-803, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5654369
  13. [13] K. Miyamoto, H. Yoshioka, N. Watanabe, and Y. Takefuji, “Modeling of Cooperative Behavior Agent Based on Collision Avoidance Decision Process,” Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 257-260, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658861.2658936
  14. [14] Y. Tamura, T. Fukuzawa, and H. Asama, “Smooth Collision Avoidance in Human-Robot Coexisting Environment,” Proc. of 2010 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3887-3892, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5649673
  15. [15] D. Helbing and P. Molnar, “Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics,” Physical Review E, Vol.51, No.5, pp. 4282-4286, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282
  16. [16] Y. Tamura, P. Dai Le, K. Hitomi, N. P. Chandrasiri, T. Bando, A. Yamashita, and H. Asama, “Development of Pedestrian Behavior Model Taking Account of Intention,” Proc. of 2012 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 382-387, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385599
  17. [17] S. Thompson, T. Horiuchi, and S. Kagami, “A Probabilistic Model of Human Motion and Navigation Intent for Mobile Robot Path Planning,” Proc. of 2009 4th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 663-668, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARA.2000.4803931
  18. [18] H. Kretzschmar, M. Spies, C. Sprunk, and W. Burgard, “Socially Compliant Mobile Robot Navigation via Inverse Reinforcement Learning,” Int. J. of Robotics Research, Vol.35, No.11, pp. 1289-1307, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915619772
  19. [19] Y. Che, A. M. Okamura, and D. Sadigh, “Efficient and Trustworthy Social Navigation via Explicit and Implicit Robot-Human Communication,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol.36, No.3, pp. 692-707, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2020.2964824
  20. [20] A. Bordallo, F. Previtali, N. Nardelli, and S. Ramamoorthy, “Counterfactual Reasoning About Intent for Interactive Navigation in Dynamic Environments,” Proc. of 2015 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2943-2950, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353783
  21. [21] K. Li, S. Sun, X. Zhao, J. Wu, and M. Tan, “Inferring User Intent to Interact With a Public Service Robot Using Bimodal Information Analysis,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.33, Nos.7-8, pp. 369-387, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2019.1599727
  22. [22] A. D. May, C. Dondrup, and M. Hanheide, “Show Me Your Moves! Conveying Navigation Intention of a Mobile Robot to Humans,” Proc. of 2015 Eur. Conf. on Mobile Robots, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECMR.2015.7324049
  23. [23] M. C. Shrestha, T. Onishi, A. Kobayashi, M. Kamezaki, and S. Sugano, “Exploring the Use of Light and Display Indicators for Communicating Directional Intent,” Proc. of 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp. 165-1656, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2016.7577007
  24. [24] M. C. Shrestha, T. Onishi, A. Kobayashi, M. Kamezaki, and S. Sugano, “Communicating Directional Intent in Robot Navigation using Projection Indicators,” Proc. of 2018 27th IEEE Int. Symp. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 746-751, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525528
  25. [25] R. T. Chadalavada, H. Andreasson, M. Schindler, R. Palm, and A. J. Lilienthal, “Bi-Directional Navigation Intent Communication Using Spatial Augmented Reality and Eye-Tracking Glasses for Improved Safety in Human-Robot Interaction,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.61, Issue C, Article No.101830, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101830
  26. [26] R. T. Chadalavada, H. Andreasson, R. Krug, and A. J. Lilienthal, “That’s on my Mind! Robot to Human Intention Communication Through On-Board Projection on Shared Floor Space,” Proc. of 2015 European Conf. on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECMR.2015.7403771
  27. [27] M. Kamezaki, A. Kobayashi, Y. Yokoyama, H. Yanagawa, M. Shrestha, and S. Sugano, “A Preliminary Study of Interactive Navigation Framework with Situation-Adaptive Multimodal Inducement: Pass-By Scenario,” Int. J. of Social Robotics, Vol.12, pp. 567-588, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00574-3
  28. [28] H. Mori, T. Kurahashi, T. Iwase, T. Machida, A. Kozato, M. Yamashita, and H. Kitaoka, “Modeling of Pedestrian Behavior for Evaluating Safety Systems,” J. of Information Processing Society of Japan, Vol.50, No.12, pp. 3175-3185, 2009 (in Japanese).
  29. [29] M. Yoda and Y. Shiota, “Mobile Robot’s Passing Motion Algorithm Based on Subjective Evaluation,” Trans. of the JSME, Vol.66, No.650, pp. 156-163, 2000 (in Japanese).
  30. [30] M. Imanishi and T. Sano, “Analysis of Avoiadnce Behavior From Pedestrian Perspective,” J. of Architecture and Planning, Vol.81, No.719, pp. 57-63, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.81.57

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 09, 2024