JRM Vol.33 No.3 pp. 582-589
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2021.p0582


Influence of Labor Conditions and Interaction Among Individuals on Circadian Activity Rhythms in the Ant Camponotus Japonicus

Masashi Shiraishi*, Takumi Odan**, Osamu Yamanaka*, and Hiraku Nishimori*

*Meiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University
4-21-1 Nakano, Nakano, Tokyo 164-8525, Japan

**Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Hiroshima University
1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan

January 27, 2021
April 22, 2021
June 20, 2021
circadian rhythm, ant, social interaction
Influence of Labor Conditions and Interaction Among Individuals on Circadian Activity Rhythms in the Ant <i>Camponotus Japonicus</i>

Appearance (left) and the non-appearance (right) of circadian activity of ants

In this study, we investigated the relationship between the activity rhythms of Camponotus japonicus worker ants and their interactions. Specifically, one or two workers collected from either inside or outside the nest in a breeding colony were placed in a measurement system under a constant dark condition, and their activity rhythms were measured for 14 days. We thereby examined the relationship between the activity rhythm in the system and the experimental conditions, which consisted of four different combinations of working locations during breeding (in/outside the nest) and single/double workers (one ant / two ants) in the measurement system, over a total of 96 samples. A large number of the sampled ants (about 90% of the total) showed circadian activity rhythms. The proportion of circadian activity rhythm was lower and the dispersion of the period was larger in the circadian activity rhythm observed in single workers collected from within the nest than in the other three experimental conditions. In all four experimental conditions, the amplitude of the circadian activity rhythm decayed on an approximate 5-day scale. These results provide quantitative evidence that the activity rhythm of ants is determined by the location of labor and individual interactions during breeding.

Cite this article as:
Masashi Shiraishi, Takumi Odan, Osamu Yamanaka, and Hiraku Nishimori, “Influence of Labor Conditions and Interaction Among Individuals on Circadian Activity Rhythms in the Ant Camponotus Japonicus,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.3, pp. 582-589, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] N. Pinter-Wollman et al., “How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants?,” Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol., Vol.66, No.10, pp. 1407-1420, 2012.
  2. [2] A. P. Modlmeier and S. Foitzik, “Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants,” Behav. Ecol., Vol.22, No.5, pp. 1026-1032, 2011.
  3. [3] M. Brambilla et al., “Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective,” Swarm Intelligence, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 1-41, 2013.
  4. [4] E. Bonabeau et al., “Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems,” Oxford University, 1999.
  5. [5] M. Hiraga and K. Ohkura, “Effects of Congestion on Swarm Performance and Autonomous Specialization in Robotic Swarms,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.4, pp. 526-534, 2019.
  6. [6] D. P. Mersch et al., “Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization,” Science, Vol.340, No.6136, pp. 1090-1093, 2013.
  7. [7] B. Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson, “The ants,” Harvard University Press, 1990.
  8. [8] A. Dahbi et al., “Trophallaxis mediates uniformity of colony odor in Cataglyphis iberica ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae),” J. Insect Behav., Vol.12, No.4, pp. 559-567, 1999.
  9. [9] V. K. Sharma et al., “Possible evidence for shift work schedules in the media workers of the ant species Camponotus compressus,” Chronobiol. Int., Vol.21, No.2, pp. 297-308, 2004.
  10. [10] S. Mildner and F. Roces, “Plasticity of daily behavioral rhythms in foragers and nurses of the ant Camponotus rufipes: influence of social context and feeding times,” PLos One, Vol.12, No.1, Article e0169244, 2017.
  11. [11] H. Fujioka et al., “Ant circadian activity associated with brood care type,” Biol. Lett., Vol.13, No.2, Article ID 20160743, 2017.
  12. [12] H. Fujioka et al., “Ant activity-rest rhythms vary with age and interaction frequencies of workers,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., Vol.73, No.3, Article No.30, 2019.
  13. [13] A. Koto et al., “Social isolation causes mortality by disrupting energy homeostasis in ants,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., Vol.69, No.4, pp. 583-591, 2015.
  14. [14] O. Yamanaka et al., “Verification of mathematical models of response threshold through statistical characterisation of the foraging activity in ant societies,” Scientific Reports, Vol.9, No.1, Article No.8845, 2019.
  15. [15] S. R. Lone and V. K. Sharma, “Timekeeping Through Social Contacts: Social Synchronization of Circadian Locomotor Activity Rhythm in the Carpenter Ant Camponotus paria,” Chronobiology Int., Vol.28, No.10, pp. 862-872, 2011.
  16. [16] B. Schmid et al., “A new ImageJ plug-in “ActogramJ” for chronobiological analyses,” J. Biol. Rhythms, Vol.26, No.5, pp. 464-467, 2011.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 03, 2021