Top > JRM > Experimental Comparison of Two Ceiling Hanging Mobile Robots ...

single-rb.php

JRM Vol.26 No.1 pp. 40-50
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2014.p0040
(2014)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 980

Experimental Comparison of Two Ceiling Hanging Mobile Robots Through Real Prototypes Development

Rui Fukui*, Hiroshi Morishita**, and Tomomasa Sato***

*Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

**HMI Corp., 35-2 Oyama, Matsudo-Shi, Chiba 271-0093, Japan

***The University of Tokyo Future Center Initiative, 227-6 Wakashiba, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-0871, Japan

Received:
June 20, 2013
Accepted:
September 2, 2013
Published:
February 20, 2014
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
mobile robot, ceiling hanging robot, humanrobot symbiosis, permanent magnet
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to develop a ceiling hanging mobile robot for factories, offices and living spaces where human and robots can share spaces cooperatively. Based on an analysis of related work, we select two promising candidates of ceiling attachment method; a permanent magnet method and a mechanical constraint method. We combine these two ceiling attachment methods with practical locomotion methods, and realize two ceiling hanging mobile robots. Two different robots are designed and implemented based on our selected approaches. We evaluated the basic performances of those two robots in experiments. Difficulties in their design and implementation processes of the two robots are described, and technical insights are summarized based on the comparison of difficulties, safety, performance and cost. Discussions reveal that the two robots have quite different characteristics. In conclusion, two different application areas are proposed for the two robots with different ceiling attachment methods. Although there are large numbers of reports on wall climbing or ceiling hanging mobile robots, this paper is the first work, to our knowledge, to compare qualitatively and quantitatively the performances of multiple robots through development of real prototypes.
Cite this article as:
R. Fukui, H. Morishita, and T. Sato, “Experimental Comparison of Two Ceiling Hanging Mobile Robots Through Real Prototypes Development,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.26 No.1, pp. 40-50, 2014.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] E.M. Abdel-Rahman, A. H. Nayfeh, and Z. N.Masoud, “Dynamics and control of cranes: A review,” J. of Vibration and Control, Vol.9, No.7, pp. 863-908, 2003.
  2. [2] W. Singhose et al., “Use of cranes in education and international collaborations,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.23, No.5, pp. 881-892, 2011.
  3. [3] T. Hashimoto, T. Ono, N. Kamiya, and H. Kobayashi, “Development of rail trajectory measurement device for inspection of crane rail,” Int. J. of Automation Technology, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 22-28, 2012.
  4. [4] T. Sato et al., “Construction of ceiling adsorbed mobile robots platform utilizing permanent magnet inductive traction method,” in Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 552-558, 2004.
  5. [5] R. Fukui et al., “Hangbot: A ceiling mobile robot with robust locomotion under a large payload (key mechanisms integration and performance experiments),” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4601-4607, 2011.
  6. [6] V. Scheinman, “Robotworld: A multiple robot vision guided assembly system,” in Proc. of the 4th Int. Symposium on Robotics Research, 1987.
  7. [7] S. Hirose et al., “Machine that can walk and climb on floors, walls and ceilings,” in Proc. of Fifth Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, pp. 753-758, 1991.
  8. [8] R. L. Tummala et al., “Climbing the walls [distributed robotics],” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 10-19, 2002.
  9. [9] T. Miyake, H. Ishihara, and T. Tomino, “Vacuum-based wet adhesion system for wall climbing robots – lubricating action and seal action by the liquid –,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 1824-1829, 2009.
  10. [10] Urakami Research & Development Co. Ltd., “Looper type cleaning robot,” JP Patent, p2007-307541, May 2006.
  11. [11] J. Liu, Z. Tong, J. Fu, D.Wang, Q. Su, and J. Zou, “A gecko inspired fluid driven climbing robot,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 783-788, 2011.
  12. [12] J. Eckerle et al., “Electroadhesion,” US Patent, uS20080089002 A1, Jun. 2006.
  13. [13] K. Taguchi and A. Ishizaki, “Development of a wall moving minirobot using adhesive method,” J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 150-153, 1996.
  14. [14] M. Murphy and M. Sitti, “Waalbot: An agile small-scale wallclimbing robot utilizing dry elastomer adhesives,” IEEE/ASME Tran. on Mechatronics, Vol.12, No.3, pp. 330-338, 2007.
  15. [15] H. Tsukagoshi et al., “Gel-type sticky mobile inspector to traverse on the rugged wall and ceiling,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1591-1592, 2009.
  16. [16] T. Seo and M. Sitti, “Under-actuated tank-like climbing robot with various transitioning capabilities,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 777-782, 2011.
  17. [17] S. Kim et al., “SpinybotII: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines,” in Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, pp. 601-606, 2005.
  18. [18] S. Kim et al., “Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol.24, No.1, pp. 65-74, 2008.
  19. [19] N. Sugimoto, T. Sasaki, T. Saito, and M. S. H. Nagata, “Function and safety of a freely-movable ceiling suspension system,” in Proc. of the 16th Annual Conf. of the Robotics Society of Japan, ser. 1L19, 2002.
  20. [20] K. Tsuru and S. Hirose, “Development of wall-climbing robot of magnetic adsorption type used of principle of omni-directional mobile robot “V max”,” in Proc. of JSME Robotics and Mechatronics Conf., 1A1-D20, 2008.
  21. [21] G. Lee et al., “Combot: Compliant climbing robotic platform with transitioning capability and payload capacity,” in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 2737-2742, 2012.
  22. [22] K. Tsuru and K. Yoneda, “Window cleaning robot with magnetic synchronous drive,” J. of Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.25, No.5, pp. 738-744, 2007.
  23. [23] M. Menon and H. Asasda, “Actuation and position estimation of a passive mobile end effector from across a thin wall for heavy-duty aircraft manufacturing,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 985-991, 2009.
  24. [24] J. C. Grieco et al., “A six-legged climbing robot for high payloads,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Control Applications, pp. 446-450, 1998.
  25. [25] K. Inoue et al., “Omni-directional gait of limb mechanism robot hanging from grid-like structure,” in Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1732-1737, 2006.
  26. [26] Z. Lu et al., “Transition motion from ladder climbing to brachiation for multi-locomotion robot,” in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 1916-1921, 2009.
  27. [27] G. Stepan et al., “Acroboter: a ceiling based crawling, hoisting and swinging service robot platform,” in Beyond Gray Droids: Domestic Robot Design for the 21st Century Workshop at Human Computer Interaction, 2009.
  28. [28] R. Fukui et al., “Development of a manipulation component for a container transferring robot in living space (design and evaluation of a high compliant manipulation mechanism),” in Proc. of 11th Int. Symposium on Experimental Robotics, 2008.
  29. [29] R. Fukui et al., “Design of distributed end-effectors for cagingspecialized manipulator (design concept and development of finger component),” in Proc. of 13th Int. Symposium on Experimental Robotics, 2012.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 09, 2024