JRM Vol.25 No.6 pp. 973-982
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2013.p0973


Pneumatically Driven Prehension Orthosis with Force Control Function

Shunji Moromugi*1, Takayuki Tanaka*2, Toshio Higashi*3,
Maria Q. Feng*4, and Takakazu Ishimatsu*1

*1Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan

*2Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Kita 14, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0814, Japan

*3Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan

*4Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA

May 10, 2013
November 15, 2013
December 20, 2013
prehension orthosis, pneumatic actuation, force control, muscle activity, spinal code injury
A prehension orthosis with a pneumatic actuator has been developed to compensate for the disability of cervical cord injury patients and support their daily activities. One major feature of this orthosis is that the user can continually pinch or hold a target object using a finely adjusted finger force. The movement and force applied to the fingers can be controlled by continuous instructional signals fromthe user through the activity of a command muscle, which is selected from among the muscles without functional impairment in the user’s body. The level of muscle activity can be obtained by using an original sensor that detects the hardness of the target muscle through contact with the skin. The level of muscle activity can be estimated by the hardness information of the muscle. This sensor is easily fixed to a user’s body by using an elastic belt and even works over clothing. Therefore, the user can wear the system very easily. This feature allows the system to be very user friendly. Users can handle fragile objects such as an egg or sculpted-glass by using this prehension orthosis because of its finger force control function. Excellent dexterity in the finger force control has been demonstrated through evaluation tests conducted with various subjects, including a spinal cord injury patient.
Cite this article as:
S. Moromugi, T. Tanaka, T. Higashi, M. Feng, and T. Ishimatsu, “Pneumatically Driven Prehension Orthosis with Force Control Function,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.25 No.6, pp. 973-982, 2013.
Data files:
  1. [1] T. J. Engen, “Development of upper extremity orthotics,” Orth. and Pros., Vol.24, No.2, pp. 1-31, 1970.
  2. [2] W. Hector and M. Kay, “Clinical evaluation of the engen plastic hand orthosis,” Artificial Limbs, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 13-26, 1969.
  3. [3] N. Benjuya and S. B. Kenney, “Myoelectric hand orthosis,” J. of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 149-154, 1990.
  4. [4] M. Slack and D. Berbrayer, “A Myoelectrically Controlled Wrist-Hand Orthosis for Brachial Plexus Injury: A Case Study,” J. of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol.4, No.3, pp. 171-174, 1992.
  5. [5] K. Tadano, M. Akai, K. Kadota, and K. Kawashima, “Development of Grip Amplified Glove using Bi-articular Mechanism with Pneumatic Artificial Rubber Muscle,” 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation Anchorage Convention District, pp. 2363-2368, 2010.
  6. [6] Y. Kadowaki, T. Noritsugu, M. Takaiwa, D. Sasaki, and M. Kato, “Development of soft power-assist glove and control based on human intent,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.23, No.2, 2011.
  7. [7] Y. Hasegawa, Y. Mikami, K. Watanabe, Z. Firouzimehr, and Y. Sankai, “Wearable handling support system for paralysed patient,” Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 22-26, 2008.
  8. [8] S. Moromugi, Y. Koujina, S. Ariki, A. Okamoto, T. Tanaka, M. Q. Feng, and T. Ishimatsu, “Muscle Stiffness Sensor to control assisting device for disabled,” Proc. 8th Int. Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, pp. 459-462, 2003.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2024