single-rb.php

JRM Vol.24 No.1 pp. 105-114
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2012.p0105
(2012)

Paper:

GPU Acceleration in a Visual Servo System

Chuantao Zang and Koichi Hashimoto

Graduate School of Information Science, Tohoku University, 6-6-01 Aramaki-Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan

Received:
May 2, 2011
Accepted:
August 16, 2011
Published:
February 20, 2012
Keywords:
GPU acceleration, homography, ESM, SIFT, visual servo
Abstract

In this paper we present our novel work of using the Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) to improve the performance of a homography-based visual servo system. We propose a GPU accelerated Efficient Second-order Minimization (GPU-ESM) algorithm to ensure a fast and stable homography solution, approximately 20 times faster than its CPU implementation. To enhance the system stability, we adopt a GPU accelerated Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) algorithm to deal with those cases where GPU-ESM algorithm performs poor, such as large image differences, occlusion and so on. The combination of both GPU accelerated algorithms is described in detail. The effectiveness of our GPU accelerated system is evaluated with experimental data. The key optimization techniques in our GPU applications are presented as a reference for other researchers.

Cite this article as:
Chuantao Zang and Koichi Hashimoto, “GPU Acceleration in a Visual Servo System,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.24, No.1, pp. 105-114, 2012.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. Hutchinson, G. D. Hager, and P. I. Corke, “A tutorial on visual servo control,” IEEE Trans. on Rob. and Autom., Vol.12, No.5, pp. 651-670, 1996.
  2. [2] G. Chesi and K. Hashimoto, “Configuration and robustness in visual servo,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 178-185, 2004.
  3. [3] C. Samson, M. L. Borgne, and B. Espiau, “Robot Control: the Task Function Approach,” Oxford University Press, USA, 1991.
  4. [4] G. Chesi and K. Hashimoto, “Visual Servoing via Advanced Numerical Methods,” pp. 133-149, Springer, 2010.
  5. [5] M. Vargas and E. Malis, “Visual servoing based on an analytical homography decomposition,” Proc. of the 44th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control and European Control Conf., pp. 5379-5384, 2005.
  6. [6] Y. Fang, W. Dixon, D. Dawson, and P. Chawda, “Homographybased visual servoing of wheeled mobile robots,” Proc. of the 41st IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Vol.3, pp. 2866-2871, 2002.
  7. [7] S. Benhimane and E.Malis, “Homography-based 2d visual tracking and servoing,” Int. J. of Robotic Research, Vol.26, No.7, pp. 661-676, 2007.
  8. [8] G. Silveira and E. Malis, “Direct Visual Servoing with respect to Rigid Objects,” IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, USA, October 2007.
  9. [9] R. Hartley and A. Zisserman, “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision,” pp. 69-99, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  10. [10] H. Y. Shum and R. Szeliski, “Systems and Experiment paper: Construction of panoramic image mosaics with global and local alignment,” Int. J. of Computer Vision, Vol.36, No.2, pp. 101-130, 2000.
  11. [11] S. Benhimane and E. Malis, “Real-time image-based tracking of planes using efficient second-order minimization,” IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots Systems, Sendai, Japan, 2004.
  12. [12] D. G. Lowe, “Object recognition from local scale-invariant features,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Vol.2, pp. 1150-1157, 1999.
  13. [13] E. Malis, “Improving vision-based control using efficient secondorder minimization techniques IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation,” New Orleans, USA, April 2004.
  14. [14] E. Malis, “An efficient unified approach to direct visual tracking of rigid and deformable surfaces,” IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, USA, October 2007.
  15. [15] Y. Ke and R. Sukthankar, “PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 506-513, 2004.
  16. [16] H. Bay, Y. Tuytelaars, and G. L. Van, “Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF),” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol.110, pp. 346-359, 2008.
  17. [17] S. Heymann, K. Muller, A. Smolic, B. Froehlich, and T. Wiegand, “SIFT implementation and optimization for general-purpose GPU,” in WSCG ’07, pp. 317-322, 2007.
  18. [18] C. Wu, J. Frahm, and M. Pollefeys, “Detecting Large Repetitive Structures with Salient Boundaries,” Proc. of the 11th European Conf. on Computer Vision: Part II, Springer-Verlag, pp. 142-155, 2010.
  19. [19] J. Shimamura, K. Arakawa, H. Arai, and T. Yasuno, “Multiple-Plane Detection based on Homography and Projected Line Detection for Use in a Projector-Camera System,” J. of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Vol.61, No.1, pp. 76-84, 2007.
  20. [20] NVIDIA, “CUDA Prograpming Guide,” Version 2.3, NVIDIA Corporation: Santa Clara, California.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Feb. 25, 2021