single-dr.php

JDR Vol.16 No.8 pp. 1257-1264
(2021)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p1257

Survey Report:

Benefits of Defining Geological Sensitive Zones in the Mitigation of Disasters Along Earthquake Fault Zones in Taiwan – The Case of Milun Fault

Tyan-Ming Chu*1, Wen-Jeng Huang*2, Tsung-Yi Lin*3, Shih-Ting Lu*4, Yen-Chiu Liu*4, Cheng-Shing Chiang*5,†, and Yi-Huei Chang*6

*1Pro-Vision Environmental Engineering Corporation
9F-4, No.65, Songde Road, Xin-Yi District, Taipei, Taiwan

*2Graduate Institute of Applied Geology, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

*3Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

*4Central Geological Survey, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), New Taipei, Taiwan

*5921 Earthquake Museum of Taiwan, National Museum of Natural Science, Taichung, Taiwan

Corresponding author

*6Systems and Technology Corporation, New Taipei, Taiwan

Received:
May 18, 2021
Accepted:
September 29, 2021
Published:
December 1, 2021
Keywords:
earthquake fault zone, surface rupture, Milun Fault, Taiwan
Abstract

In Taiwan, the main purpose of earthquake fault zone legislation is to prevent earthquake-related disasters around the surface traces of active faults, particularly in urban areas. Here, the Geologically Sensitive Area (GSA) of the Milun Fault (Milun Earthquake Fault Zone) is used as an example to reveal the importance of such legislation. Field data collected along the Milun Fault before and after the 2018 Hualien Earthquake were used to reveal the reappearance of damages within the GSA. The 2018 Hualien Earthquake represents one of the shortest recurrence intervals (67 years) among all major faults in Taiwan. Most of the surface ruptures and damaged buildings in Hualien City were within the Milun Fault GSA and concentrated on the hanging wall of the fault. Moreover, 61% (91/148) of the damaged buildings and 83% (692/835) of the surface ruptures occurred within 100 m of the fault line. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of defining GSAs of active faults for mitigating earthquake hazards.

Cite this article as:
T. Chu, W. Huang, T. Lin, S. Lu, Y. Liu, C. Chiang, and Y. Chang, “Benefits of Defining Geological Sensitive Zones in the Mitigation of Disasters Along Earthquake Fault Zones in Taiwan – The Case of Milun Fault,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16, No.8, pp. 1257-1264, 2021.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] H. Tsutsumi, J. S. Perez, J. U. Marjes, K. L. Papiona, and N. T. Ramos, “Coseismic Displacement and Recurrence Interval of the 1973 Ragay Gulf Earthquake, Southern Luzon, Philippines,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10, No.1, pp. 83-90, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0083, 2015.
  2. [2] S. Naito, K. X. Hao, S. Senna, T. Saeki, H. Nakamura, H. Fujiwara, and T. Azuma, “Investigation of Damages in Immediate Vicinity of Co-Seismic Faults During the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.12, No.5, pp. 899-915, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0899, 2017.
  3. [3] P. Boncio, F. Liberi, M. Caldarella, and F. C. Nurminen, “Width of surface rupture zone for thrust earthquakes: implications for earthquake fault zoning,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., Vol.18, pp. 241-256, 2018.
  4. [4] S. Senna, A. Wakai, H. Suzuki, A. Yatagai, H. Matsuyama, and H. Fujiwara, “Modeling of the Subsurface Structure from the Seismic Bedrock to the Ground Surface for a Broadband Strong Motion Evaluation in Kumamoto Plain,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 917-927, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p0917, 2018.
  5. [5] K. Konagai, “Data archives of seismic fault-induced damage,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.25, Issues 7-10, pp. 559-570, 2005.
  6. [6] Wellington Regional Council, “Hazard management,” 2002, http://www.gw.govt.nz/assets/council-publications/Environment%20Management_20020829_091412.pdf [accessed November 12, 2021]
  7. [7] E. W. Hart and J. W. Williams, “Fault-rupture hazard zones in California,” Department of conservation California Geological Survey, Special publication, Vol.42, 2007.
  8. [8] W.-T. Liang, J.-C. Lee, K.-H. Chen, and N.-C. Hsiao, “Citizen earthquake science in Taiwan: from science to hazard mitigation,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.12, No.6, pp. 1174-1181, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p1174, 2017.
  9. [9] C.-S. Chiang, T.-M. Chu, W.-H. Chou, X.-H. Lee, and J.-F. Wang, “Challenges in the Preservation of Disaster Remains – Example of the Chelungpu Fault Preservation Park,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16, No.2, pp. 201-209, 2021.
  10. [10] K. I. Kelson, K.-H. Kang, W. D. Page, C.-T. Lee, and L. S. Cluff, “Representative styles of deformation along the Chelungpu Fault from the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake: Geomorphic characteristic and responses of man-made structures,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.91, No.5, pp. 930-952, 2001.
  11. [11] M.-L. Lin, C.-H. Lin, C.-H. Li, C.-Y. Liu, and C.-H. Hung, “3D modeling of the ground deformation along the fault rupture and its impact on engineering structures: Insights from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Shigang District, Taiwan,” Engineering Geology, Vol.281, Article No.105993, 2021.
  12. [12] C.-H. Pai, Y.-M. Tien, and T.-L. Teng, “A study of the human-fatality rate in near-fault regions using the Victim Attribute Database,” Nat Hazards, Vol.42, pp. 19-35, 2007.
  13. [13] https://fault.moeacgs.gov.tw/UploadFiles/images/500K/102-a3-EN.jpg [accessed November 12, 2021]
  14. [14] https://www.moeacgs.gov.tw/eng/Laws/detail?id=ccfe5f4d0b31487097bab875f101063a [accessed November 12, 2021]
  15. [15] K.-F. Ma and Y.-M. Wu, “Preface to the Focus Section on the 6 February 2018 Mw 6.4 Hualien, Taiwan,” Earthquake Seismological Research Letters, Vol.90, pp. 15-18, 2019.
  16. [16] https://scweb.cwb.gov.tw/zh-tw/earthquake/shakemap/2018020623504162022 [accessed November 12, 2021]
  17. [17] Y.-C. Lo, H. Yue, J. Sun, L. Zhao, and M. Li, “The 2018 Mw6.4 Hualien earthquake: Dynamic slip partitioning reveals the spatial transition from mountain building to subduction,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Vol.524, Article No.115729, 2019.
  18. [18] T.-L. Hsu, “Recent faulting in the Longitudinal Valley of eastern Taiwan,” Mem. Geol. Soc. China, Vol.1, pp. 95-102, 1962.
  19. [19] S.-N. Cheng, Y.-T. Yeh, and M.-S. Yu, “The 1951 Taitung earthquake in Taiwan,” J. Geol. Soc. China, Vol.39, pp. 267-285, 1996.
  20. [20] J. B. H. Shyu, Y.-R. Chuang, Y.-L. Chen, Y.-R. Lee, and C.-T. Cheng, “A New On-Land Seismogenic Structure Source Database from the Taiwan Earthquake Model (TEM) Project for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Taiwan,” Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., Vol.27, pp. 311-323, 2016.
  21. [21] C. W. Lin, W. S. Chen, Y. C. Liu, and P. T. Chen, “Active faults of eastern and southern Taiwan,” Special Publication of Central Geological Survey, Vol.23, 2009.
  22. [22] L.-H. Chung, T.-S. Shi, Y.-Q. Liu, W.-L. Hsu, C.-M. Shih, and W.-C. Wu, “Active Fault Investigation Report – Milun Fault,” Ministry of Economics Central Geological Survey Policy Plan, Central Geological Survey, MOEA Investigation Report, p. 17, 2004.
  23. [23] K.-J. Chang, J. B. H. Shyu, Y. C. Chan, R. F. Chen, and E. C. Yen, “Near fault active deformation and morphotectonic analysis based on high-resolution Airborne LiDAR data (4/4),” Central Geological Survey, MOEA Investigation Report, 2014.
  24. [24] T.-L. Hsu, “The earthquakes of Taiwan,” Quart. J. Bank Taiwan, Vol.7, pp. 148-164, 1955.
  25. [25] J. B. H. Shyu, K. Sieh, Y.-G. Chen, and C.-S. Liu, “Neotectonic architecture of Taiwan and its implications for future large earthquakes,” J. Geophys. Res. Vol.110, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003251, 2005.
  26. [26] J.-Y. Yen, C.-H. Lu, R. J. Dorsey, H. KuoChen, C.-P. Chang, C.-C. Wang, R. Y. Chuang, Y.-T. Kuo, C.-Y. Chiu, Y.-H. Chang, F. Bovenga, and W.-Y. Chang, “Insights into Seismogenic Deformation during the 2018 Hualien, Taiwan, Earthquake Sequence from InSAR, GPS, and Modeling,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol.90, No.1, pp. 78-87, 2018.
  27. [27] https://fault.moeacgs.gov.tw/MgFault/images/PDF/20180206.pdf [accessed March 31, 2018]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 04, 2022