JDR Vol.16 No.8 pp. 1265-1273
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p1265


Assessing the Intermediate Function of Local Academic Institutions During the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of Aceh, Indonesia

Daisuke Sasaki*,†, Hizir Sofyan**, Novi Reandy Sasmita**, Muzailin Affan***, and Nizamuddin Nizamuddin***

*International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University
468-1-S302 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan

Corresponding author

**Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

***Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

May 19, 2021
June 1, 2021
December 1, 2021
Aceh, intermediate function, quantitative approach, Indonesia, disaster response and recovery

There is great scholarly and practical interest in local academic institutions’ potential contributions to community rehabilitation and reconstruction in the wake of disasters. Using survey data, this study seeks to quantitatively verify the intermediate function of local academic institutions in building mutual understanding and consensus between local residents and external actors during disaster recovery efforts. The survey measured Indonesians’ perceptions of disaster relief efforts following the Sumatran earthquake and Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004. It was conducted by Syiah Kuala University Aceh, Indonesia, between July and October 2020. The authors applied parametric methods to analyze the data, including regression analysis, factor analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The analysis results reveal a relationship between the intermediate function of local academic institutions, and residents’ overall satisfaction with disaster recovery efforts. The findings suggest that the institutions’ expected intermediate functions may be influenced by regional factors, and that future policy-makers should consider regional characteristics to improve the efficacy of local disaster response and recovery efforts.

Cite this article as:
D. Sasaki, H. Sofyan, N. Sasmita, M. Affan, and N. Nizamuddin, “Assessing the Intermediate Function of Local Academic Institutions During the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of Aceh, Indonesia,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16 No.8, pp. 1265-1273, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] Executing Agency of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction for Aceh and Nias (BRR), BRR Book Series, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 2009.
  2. [2] Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center (TDMRC) (n.d.), About–Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center (TDMRC), [accessed January 28, 2021]
  3. [3] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,” 2015.
  4. [4] D. Sasaki, K. Moriyama, and Y. Ono, “Main features of the existing literature concerning disaster statistics,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.43, Article No.101382, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101382, 2020.
  5. [5] D. Sasaki, “Analysis of the Attitude Within Asia-Pacific Countries Towards Disaster Risk Reduction: Text Mining of the Official Statements of 2018 Asian Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.8, pp. 1024-1029, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p1024, 2019.
  6. [6] D. Sasaki and Y. Ono, “Overview of the Special Issue on the Development of Disaster Statistics Part 2,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.8, pp. 1010-1013, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p1010, 2019.
  7. [7] D. Sasaki, I. Taafaki, T. Uakeia, J. Seru, Y. McKay, and H. Lajar, “Influence of Religion, Culture and Education on Perception of Climate Change and its Implications: Applying Structural Equation Modeling (SEM),” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.9, pp. 1303-1308, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p1303, 2019.
  8. [8] S. Egawa, Y. Jibiki, D. Sasaki, Y. Ono, Y. Nakamura, T. Suda, and H. Sasaki, “The Correlation Between Life Expectancy and Disaster Risk,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1049-1061, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1049, 2018.
  9. [9] K. Moriyama, D. Sasaki, and Y. Ono, “Comparison of Global Databases for Disaster Loss and Damage Data,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1007-1014. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1007, 2018.
  10. [10] D. Sasaki and Y. Ono, “Overview of the Special Issue on the Development of Disaster Statistics,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1002-1006, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1002, 2018.
  11. [11] D. Sasaki, K. Moriyama, and Y. Ono, “Hidden Common Factors in Disaster Loss Statistics: A Case Study Analyzing the Data of Nepal,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1032-1038, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1032, 2018.
  12. [12] Asia Pacific Institute of Research (APIR), “Report of the Comprehensive Policy Research on Disaster Recovery Study Group (FY2016),” 2017 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] M. Affan, S. Koshimura, F. Imamura, H. Sofyan, S. Agustina, N. Nizamuddin, and N. Fadli, “Lessons Learned from Two Villages in the Tsunami Most Affected Area of Banda Aceh City; A Review of the Housing Reconstruction and the Current State of Village Development,” V. Santiago-Fandiño, Y. A. Kontar, and Y. Kaneda (Eds.), “Post-Tsunami Hazard,” pp. 59-72, Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10202-3_5, 2015.
  14. [14] R. I. Syamsidik, S. Arief, K. Munadi, and E. Melianda, “Disaster risk reduction policies and regulations in Aceh after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami,” IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, 10th Aceh Int. Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (AIWEST-DR 2016), Vol.56, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/56/1/012022, 2017.
  15. [15] D. Sasaki, “Intermediate Function of Local Academic Institutions at the Time of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Aceh,” Digests of the 31st Japan Society for Int. Development Annual Conf., 2020.
  16. [16] Syiah Kuala University, “Brief Summary of the Survey Data Regarding Recovery After Tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia,” Syiah Kuala University, 2020.
  17. [17] P. Tarka, “An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences,” Quality & Quantity, Vol.52, No.1, pp. 313-354, doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8, 2018.
  18. [18] R. P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi, “Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models,” J. of The Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.40, No.1, pp. 8-34, doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x, 2011.
  19. [19] J. Arbuckle, “Computer announcement Amos: Analysis of moment structures,” Psychometrika, Vol.59, No.1, pp. 135-137, doi: 10.1007/bf02294272, 1994.
  20. [20] K. A. Bollen and J. Scott Long, “Tests for Structural Equation Models,” Sociological Methods & Research, Vol.21, No.2, pp. 123-131, doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002001, 1992.
  21. [21] S. Mulaik, L. James, J. Van Alstine, N. Bennett, S. Lind, and C. Stilwell, “Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.105, No.3, pp. 430-445, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430, 1989.
  22. [22] J. Anderson and D. Gerbing, “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, No.3, pp. 411-423, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411, 1988.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 12, 2024