People Who Cannot Move During a Disaster – Initiatives and Examples in Japan Disaster Victim Support
Eiichi Yamasaki*,† and Haruo Hayashi**
*Faculty of Societal Safety Science, Kansai University
7-1 Hakubai-cho, Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, Japan
**National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster, Ibaraki, Japan
The main purpose of this paper is to explore the vulnerability of disaster victims from the perspective of immobility, in contrast to the conventional perspective of mobility. What causes immobility in Japan? And how have immobile people been treated? In this article, I will attempt to answer these questions using some concrete examples. Immobile people have been recognized as “people requiring assistance during a disaster” (PRADD). This term helps us understand immobility in Japan. The Sanjou flood (2004) prompted the formulation of the “Guidelines for Evacuation Support of People Requiring Assistance during a Disaster.” The national government has encouraged local governments and residents to be prepared for a disaster using the guidelines. Nevertheless, preparations for disasters have not progressed very well. It was in this context that the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) occurred.
During the GEJE, immobility raised the risk of death for PRADD due to the tsunami. After the tsunami, there were also PRADD who could not evacuate to shelters because they were anxious about how life would be there. Now many victims live in temporary housing. There will be people who cannot move to temporary housing in the future. It is likely that they will be mainly PRADD. These cases make it clear that immobility causes vulnerability to disasters.
I will also provide an example of how mobility causes vulnerability in a disaster – a stranded commuter or person during the GEJE.
-  Cabinet Office, “Guideline for evacuation assistance to PRADD,” March 2006.
-  Cabinet Office, “Report of review meeting for evacuation assistance to PRADD,” March 2013.
-  Cabinet Office, “Guidelines for the Evacuation Support of PRES,” August 2013.
-  E. Yamasaki, “Natural Disaster and Support for Victims,” Nippon Hyoron Sha Co., Ltd., September 2013.
-  E. Yamasaki, “Legislation to support disaster victims in Japan,” Asian Law in disasters, Routledge, pp. 163-177, May 2016.
-  S. C. Lubkemann, “Involuntarily Immobility : On a Theoretical Invisibility in Forced Migration Studies,” J. of Refugee Studies, Vol.21, No.4, pp. 454-475, September 2008.
-  W. Takahashi, “Divided fates of victims after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident,” Asian Law in disasters, Routledge, pp. 213-222, May 2016.
-  M. Yonetani and L. Yuen, “The evolving picture of displacement in the wake of Typhoon Haiyan: An evidence-based overview,” Manila: Government of the Philippines, Department of Social Welfare and Development, International Organization for Migration, Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre and SAS, May 2014.
-  K. Hakata, “Mobility and Vulnerability of Migrants with Displacement Background: A Case of Metro Manila,” CDRQ, Vol.8, pp. 3-27, October 2013.
-  Cabinet Office, “Disaster Management in Japan,” March 2015.
-  S. Tatsuki, “Old Age, Disability, and the Tohoku-Oki Earthquake (March 2013),” Oakland: Earthquake Spectra, Vol.29, No.S1, pp. 403-432, Mar 2013.
-  Reconstruction Agency, “Report of Situation of Reconstruction of the Great East Japan Earthquake,” November 2014.
-  Y. Shiozaki. et al., “Lessons from the Great Hanshin Earthquake,” Kamogawa Shuppan Publishing Co., Ltd., January 2005.
-  L. Guadagno, “Human Mobility in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Vol.7, Issue 1, pp. 30-40, March 2016.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.