single-dr.php

JDR Vol.11 No.6 pp. 1190-1201
(2016)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2016.p1190

Paper:

Recovery from Catastrophe and Building Back Better

Kuniyoshi Takeuchi*,† and Shigenobu Tanaka**

*International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management, Public Works Research Institute
Minamihara 1-6 Tsukuba 305-8516, Japan

Corresponding author,

2Water Resources Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan

Received:
July 14, 2016
Accepted:
November 17, 2016
Published:
December 1, 2016
Keywords:
Tohoku, Banda Aceh, Tacloban, recovery, building back better
Abstract

Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Tohoku cities in Japan and Tacloban, Philippines were all completely destroyed and have recovered or are now recovering from the ocean of debris. Banda Aceh and Tacloban have recovered to a normal state rather quickly within two years or so after the disaster’s occurrence. The Tohoku cities are taking a much longer time and even now, more than 170,000 (March 10, 2016) people are in evacuation houses of various kinds. Such a difference comes from the basic selection of the recovery process, based on the basic policy of reconstruction.
Building resilient cities is one of the Sustainable Development Goals with disaster risk reduction targets. In order to build resilient cities, the strategy of building back better, a new focus priority in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, plays a key role. As disasters occur everywhere one after another, recovery processes also take place everywhere after each disaster. Building back better is therefore one of the most practical ways of building resilient cities.
Quick recovery has many advantages if it extends to building back better toward resilient cities but in almost all cases as experienced in Banda Aceh and Tacloban, once a city is recovered freely, it is extremely difficult to redesign and gradually install resilience into the city formation. On the other hand, slow recovery and waiting time, as experiencing in Tohoku cities, make people suffer, make local economies difficult to recover, and have high national costs. It is difficult to assess how and under what conditions the cost of such investment may be recovered by building resilient cities with long-term safety.
The justification for selecting a recovery trajectory depends on the state of the national economy as well as the safety culture of the nation. Yet more important and practical support for building back better is having a pre-disaster recovery plan prepared before a disaster occurs. In fact, regardless of the availability of official pre-disaster plans, the redevelopment and reform efforts to improve communities in normal times will help promote a swift and effective reconstruction when an unexpected disaster occurs. This was experienced in Tokyo after the Great Kanto Earthquake and after World War II, as well as in many cities in Japan.

Cite this article as:
K. Takeuchi and S. Tanaka, “Recovery from Catastrophe and Building Back Better,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.6, pp. 1190-1201, 2016.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] A. Aytin, “Aquino’s “Build Back Better”: A Cooperate takeover of government’s reconstruction program,” Intal Globalize solidarity, Mar. 4, 2014. http://www.intal.be/nl/blogs/hans-schaap/aquinos-build-back-better-corporate-takeover-governments-reconstruction-program [downloaded on March 18, 2016]
  2. [2] Basic Act on Disaster Counter-Measures 1961 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] B. Basilio, “Everything you wanted to know about Tacloban’s “no build zone” but are afraid to ask,” Re-charge Tacloban 2014, Sep. 18, 2014, http://re-charge.ph/everything-you-wanted-to-know- about-taclobans-no-build-zone-but-are-afraid-to-ask/ [downloaded on March 8, 2016]
  4. [4] BRR, “10 Management Lessons for Host Governments Coordinating Post-disaster Reconstruction,” Executing Agency for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (BRR) of Aceh-Nias, Printed in Indonesia, 2009.
  5. [5] Cabinet Office, “Target area of investigation of economic disaster impacts assessment,” Material 3-1 (Document 3-1 Scope of Economic Damage Prediction Review), Disaster reduction in charge, Cabinet Office of Japan, 2004 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] Cabinet Office, “Towards Reconstruction: Hope beyond the Disaster 2011,” Jun. 25, 2011.
  7. [7] I. Christoplos, “The elusive ‘window of opportunity’ for risk reduction in post disaster recovery 2006,” Retrieved December 21, 2010, from Provention Consortium, http://www. proventionconsortium.org/themes/default/pdfs/Forum06/Forum06 _Session3_Recovery.pdf
  8. [8] Heisei 23 Law 76, “The Basic Act on Reconstruction in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011.”
  9. [9] IRP, “Guidance note on recovery: Pre-Disaster recovery planning,” International Recovery Platform (IRP), 2012.
  10. [10] A. Ismail-Zadeh and K. Takeuchi, “Preventive disaster management of extreme natural events,” Nat. Hazards, Vol.42, pp. 459-467, 2007.
  11. [11] K. Iuchi and E. Maly, “Recovery Plans and Progress,” In: IRIDeS, “Typhoon Haiyan: Report on the ongoing process of building back better,” Chapter 2, Tohoku University, Jul., 2016.
  12. [12] H. Iwaki, Korekawa, Gonda, Masuda, and Itoh, “Estimate of stock damage by the Great East Japan Earthquake (How to estimate the amount of stock damage caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake),” Discussion paper, Economic Research Bureau, Cabinet Office 2011 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] A. Koshizawa, “Reconstruction planning,” Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc., Tokyo, 2005 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] Metropolitan Tokyo, Tokyo Urban Reconstruction Manual 1997a (in Japanese).
  15. [15] Metropolitan Tokyo, Tokyo Urban Life Reconstruction Manual 1997b (in Japanese).
  16. [16] R. S. Momo, personal communication on 2015.11.8 at Undersecretary’s office of DPWH 2015.
  17. [17] I. Nakabayashi, “The concept of pre-disaster planning for urban reconstruction after the next big one of earthquake: case study on strategy and preparedness for urban reconstruction in Tokyo,” Tokyo Metropolitan University, Comprehensive Urban Studies, Vol.68, No.1, pp. 141-164, 1999 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] National Police Agency, “Damages and police actions of the Northeast Japan off-shore Pacific Ocean earthquake in 2011,” Press release on June 10, 2016, http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi /biki/higaijokyo.pdf
  19. [19] NEDA, “Reconstruction assistance on Yolanda (RAY),” National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), Dec. 16, 2013.
  20. [20] H. Okada, “Reality of the damaged area appearing many lands without owners,” 2014, Land acquisition Series (1) What is stopping reconstruction? Toyo Keizai On-line, Vol.19 April 2014 (in Japanese), http://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/35587 [downloaded on July 14, 2016]
  21. [21] Presidential decree 1067, the Philippines Government, 1976.
  22. [22] Reconstruction Agency, “Current status of reconstruction and challenges,” Reference material 5, Mar. 7, 2013 (in Japanese).
  23. [23] Reconstruction Agency, “State of reconstruction and the recent exercises,” Reconstruction Agency, November 2015 (in Japanese).
  24. [24] Reconstruction Agency, “State of reconstruction and the recent exercises,” Reconstruction Agency, March 2016 (in Japanese), http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat7/sub-cat7-2/ 201603_pamphlet.pdf [downloaded on March 18, 2016]
  25. [25] Republic of Indonesia, “Master plan for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of the regions and communities of the Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam and the Islands of Nias, Province of North Sumatera 2005,” April 2005.
  26. [26] M. Takahashi, S. Tanaka, R. Kimura, M. Umitsu, R. Tabuchi, T. Kuroda, M. Ando, and F. Kimata, “Restoration after the Sumatra Earthquake Tsunami in Banda Aceh,” J. of Natural Disaster Science, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 53-61, 2007.
  27. [27] T. Uenoyama and N. Arai, “Viewpoint of economic losses of catastrophic disasters: Taking examples of Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, 9/11 Terrorism and Hurricane Katrina,” 2007, ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.177, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Japan (in Japanese).
  28. [28] UNISDR, “Building back better for next time – Experiences and lessons learnt from the project “Building Resilience to Tsunamis in the Indian Ocean”,” Printed in Bangkok, May, 2010.
  29. [29] UNISDR, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030,” 2015a.
  30. [30] UNISDR, “Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 – Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management,” 2015b.
  31. [31] S. Yamanaka, “To promote pre-disaster reconstruction planning,” Kwansei Gakuin University Disaster Reconstruction Research Institute, Disaster Reconstruction Research Bulletin, Vol.1, pp. 181-191, 2009 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 11, 2018