JDR Vol.11 No.6 pp. 1202-1210
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2016.p1202


International Efforts Toward Robustness of Flood Management

Masahiko Murase

Division for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DSD/DESA), The United Nations
New York, NY, USA

Corresponding author,

June 8, 2016
September 12, 2016
December 1, 2016
flood management, risk sharing, incentive

Practical flood management depends on the extent to which the cost of taking risks is shared in a society among governments, interested parties, communities, and individuals. Risk management calls for identification, analysis, assessment, control, avoidance, minimization, or elimination of unacceptable risks through policies, procedures, and practices under three strategies for risk management: reduction, retention, and transfer. Flood risk management under a variety of uncertainties, such as the impacts of climate change, favors the implementation of flexible and adaptive management in top-down and bottom-up approaches. The former uses projections of global or spatially downscaled models to drive resource models and project impacts. The latter uses policy or planning tools to identify which changes in climate would most threaten their long-range plans or operations. Particularly for the bottom-up approaches, appropriate indicators that directly assess the flood risk of each area are essential. This study analyzes the international efforts of robust flood management from the top-down and bottom-up approaches, such as insurance and indicator and management systems, to seek incentive mechanisms for risk management. To implement international commitments, such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, there are gaps in implementing a holistic approach to flood management strategies and, therefore, mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and addressing sustainable development. The robustness of flood management requires the capacity-building necessary to understand and sufficiently respond to flood hazards, vulnerabilities, and benefits as an important evolutionary link in the transition between implementing global development goals, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, and disaster risk-reduction activities. There are three challenges: data and information infrastructure, inter-disciplinary knowledge development, and trans-disciplinary policy.

Cite this article as:
M. Murase, “International Efforts Toward Robustness of Flood Management,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.6, pp. 1202-1210, 2016.
Data files:
  1. [1] APFM (Associate Programme on Flood Management), “Integrated Flood Management – Concept Paper,” World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 27, 2004.
  2. [2] UN, Report of the United Nations Water Conference, Mar del Plata, 14-25 March 1977, United Nations publication, No. E.77.II.A.12, 1997.
  3. [3] Dublin Statement, “Official outcome of the International Conference on Water and the Environment: Development Issues for the 21st century,” Dublin, pp. 26-31, 1992.
  4. [4] UN, “Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development,” Official outcome of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, pp. 3-14, 1992.
  5. [5] UN, “Report of the Commission on Sustainable Development on its Sixth Session,” New York, E/CN.17/1998/20, 1998.
  6. [6] “Ministerial Declaration of the Hague on Water Security in the 21st Century,” Official outcome of the Second World Water Forum, 3-7 December 2001, The Hague, 2000.
  7. [7] Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, and Federal Ministry for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Ministerial Declaration, Bonn Keys, and Bonn Recommendations for Action,” International Freshwater Conference, 3-7 December 2001, Bonn, 2001.
  8. [8] UN, “United Nations Millennium Declaration,” Resolution A/RES/55/2 of the United Nations General Assembly at its 55th Session, New York, USA, 2000.
  9. [9] United Nations, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” the United Nations General Assembly Seventieth session Agenda items 15 and 116, A/70/L.1., 18 September 2015, New York, USA, 2015.
  10. [10] Toshio Koike et al., “Risk Reduction from Scientific Evidence based, Special Edition for World Trend on Disaster Risk Reduction,” River, Tokyo, Japan, May 2015, pp. 3-55, 2015 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] UNISDR, “Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: building the Resilience of nations and Communities to Disasters (HFA),” endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly in the Resolution A/RES/60/195, 2005, available at [accessed May 31, 2016]
  12. [12] UNISDR, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2010,” adopted at the Third UN World Conference in Sendai, Japan, on March 18, 2015, available at [accessed September 3, 2015]
  13. [13] United Nations, “Adoption of the Paris Agreement, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties,” Twenty-first session, Paris, 30 November to 11 December 2015, Agenda items 4(b), FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, Paris, France, December 12, 2015.
  14. [14] Science Council of Japan, “Strengthening Disaster Resilience is Essential to Sustainable Development,” G-Science Academies’ Joint Statements to Prime Minister Mr. Abe, 19 April 2016, available at [accessed May 31, 2016]
  15. [15] WMO, “Social Aspects and Stakeholder Involvement in Integrated Flood Management,” Flood Management Policy Series, Associated Programme on Flood Management, APFM Technical Document No.4, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 8-10, 2006.
  16. [16] WMO, “Risk Sharing in Flood Management, Flood Management Tools Series,” World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  17. [17] K. Miller and D. Yates, “Climate Change and Water Resources: A Primer for Municipal Water Providers, Denver, CO: AwwaRF and UCAR,” p. 83, 2006.
  18. [18] K. Wada, M. Murase, and Y. Tomizawa, “A Trial for the hazard Risk Assessment of Global Warming by regional Climate Change Model,” Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol.48, 2004 February, 457-462, 2004 (in Japanese with English Abstract), [accessed May 31, 2016]
  19. [19] K. Wada, M. Murase, and Y. Tomizawa, “Study on the Flood and Drought Risk Assessment of Global Warming by Regional Climate Model,” Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol.49, pp. 493-498, 2005 (in Japanese with English Abstract), [accessed May 31, 2016]
  20. [20] M. Murase, “A Case Study of Water Management in the Greater Tokyo Region,” International Symposium on Disaster Mitigation and Basin-wide Water Management (ISDB/IAHR), December 7-10, 2003, Niigata, Japan, pp. 766-773, 2003.
  21. [21] M. Murase, A. Nakamura, and H. Kawasaki, “A Trial of Establishing Indicators for Evaluation of Hydrological Cycle Focusing Flood Mitigation by Dams,” Advances in River Engineering, JSCE, Vol.10, pp. 513-518, 2004 (in Japanese with English Abstract).
  22. [22] University of Tokyo, ICHARM, Asia Water Cycle Symposium (AWCS2016) 1-2 March 2016, Tokyo, Japan, available at [accessed May 31, 2016]
  23. [23] M. Murase, A. Nakamura, J. Inomata, and H. Kawasaki, “Systematic Review of Water Management during Drought in Japan,” Second International Conference on Hydrology and Water Resources in Asia Pacific Region (APHW2004), pp. 881-889, 2004.
  24. [24] M. Murase, A. Nakamura, and H. Kawasaki, H. “An Analysis for Demand Structure and Price of Domestic Water Supply,” Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol.49, pp. 475-480, 2005.
  25. [25] M. Murase, “Risk sharing in practice for Integrated Flood Management,” Floods-from risk to opportunity, IAHS Publ, 357, pp. 117-126, 2013.
  26. [26] UNESCO-IHP, IFI Strategy 2016-2022, the 22nd Session of UNESCO-IHP Intergovernmental Council, IHP/IC-XXII/Ref.5, Paris, France, 2016.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 13, 2018