single-dr.php

JDR Vol.11 No.1 pp. 125-135
(2016)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2016.p0125

Paper:

Deformation Capacity of Steel Shear Panel Damper and its Reflection to AIJ Design Requirements

Hiroyuki Tamai* and Kazuhiko Kasai**

*Structural Engineering Division, Faculty of Engineering, Nagasaki University
1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan

**Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology
4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan

Received:
November 3, 2015
Accepted:
January 4, 2016
Published:
February 1, 2016
Keywords:
damage factor, shear panel, plastic deformation capacity, fatigue toughness, AIJ design requirements
Abstract

Shear panel dampers consisting of stiffeners and panels surrounded by four flanges are used as aseismic hysteretic dampers for buildings in Japan. Cracks can form easily in a shear panel damper when shear buckling occurs during the cyclic loading caused by a severe earthquake.
For a relatively thin panel with a large width-to-thickness ratio, the damper’s plastic deformation capacity and the presence of shear buckling can be evaluated from the maximum deformation angle. However, when it is relatively small, very-low-cycle fatigue life for a relatively thick panel must be known to predict the usage limit of the damper, because the failure pattern changes when cracks form in the weld between the panels and flanges. Fatigue life relations for a thick shear panel damper with parameters of normalized width-to-thickness ratio and deformation angle are presented. A method for predicting the fatigue life under severe earthquake conditions is also presented. To validate the prediction expression, cyclic loading tests were performed on a shear panel damper and reviewed. The applicability of the method for predicting the fatigue life was confirmed through non-stationary cyclic loading tests. These results showed the validity and effectiveness of the expressions and the method.

Cite this article as:
H. Tamai and K. Kasai, “Deformation Capacity of Steel Shear Panel Damper and its Reflection to AIJ Design Requirements,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 125-135, 2016.
Data files:
References
  1. [1]  Architectural Institute of Japan, Subcommittee on Cyclic Loading Effect, “Cyclic Loading Effect and Fatigue Damage Due To Wind and Earthquake,” Symposium Text, 2004 (in Japanese).
  2. [2]  Architectural Institute of Japan, “The Recommended Provision for Seismic Damping Systems Applied to Steel Structures,” Maruzen, 2014 (in Japanese).
  3. [3]  P. Chusilp and T. Usami, “New Elastic Stability Formulas for Multiple-Stiffened Shear Panel,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.128, No.6, pp. 833-836, 2002.
  4. [4]  T. Endo and H. Anzai, “Refined rain flow algorithm: P/V difference method,” J. Soc. Mat.Set. Japan, Vol.30, No.328, pp. 89-93, 1981 (in Japanese).
  5. [5]  M. D. Engelhardt and E. P. Popov, “Experimental performance of long links in eccentrically braced frames,” Journal Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.118, No.1, pp. 3067-3088, 1992.
  6. [6]  K. Fujinami, S. Iwaoka, H. Ryujin, H. Tamai, et al., “On the Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Frame with Energy Absorbing K-Brace Made of SN400B Steel, Part1, Part 2,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 831-834, 1998 (in Japanese).
  7. [7]  M. Hanai, H. Tamai, et al., “Elasto-Plastic Behavior of the Hysteretic Damper using a Low Yield Stress Steel Plate Installed in X-Braced Frame, Part 3 Low Cycle Fatigue Characteristics,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, II, pp. 1223-1224, 1993 (in Japanese).
  8. [8]  K. D. Hjelmstad and E. P. Popov, “Cyclic behavior and design of link beams”, Journal Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.109, No.10, pp. 2387-2403, 1983.
  9. [9]  IBC, International Building Code 2004, International Code Council, 2004.
  10. [10]  T. Ida, Y. Kanazawa, H. Tamai, et al., “Influence of Panel Stiffening on Energy Absorbing Capacity of Shear Resistance member Made of SS400 Steel, part 2,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 753-754, 1997 (in Japanese).
  11. [11]  M. Izumi, H. Narihara, and S. Yasuda, “Low Cycle Fatigue Test on Shear Yielding Type Low Yield Stress Steel Hysteretic Damper for Response Control, Part 6 Test Results of Width to Thickness Ratio of Web d/tw=90 Series,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 803-804, 1996 (in Japanese).
  12. [12]  M. Izumi, H. Narihara, and S. Yasuda, “Low Cycle Fatigue Test on Shear Yielding Type Low Yield Stress Steel Hysteretic Damper for Response Control, Part 8 Test Results of Width to Thickness Ratio of Web d/tw=90 , 130 Series,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 737-738, 1997 (in Japanese).
  13. [13]  Japan Society of Material Science “Handbook of Metal Fatigue”, Yokendo, pp. 196-212, 1978 (in Japanese).
  14. [14]  K. Kasai and E. G. Popov, “General Behavior of WF Steel Shear Link Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.112, No.2, pp. 362-382, 1986 a.
  15. [15]  K. Kasai and E. P. Popov, “Cyclic Buckling Control for Shear Link Beams,” Journal Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.112, No.3, pp. 505-523, 1986 b.
  16. [16]  Y. Kanazawa, T. Ida, H. Tamai, et al., “Influence of Panel Stiffening on Energy Absorbing Capacity of Shear Resisting member Made of SS400 Panel, Part 1, Part 2,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 751-754, 1997 (in Japanese).
  17. [17]  Y. Kanazawa, H. Tamai, K. Kondoh, M. Hanai, and K. Fujinami, “Influence of Inaccurate Stiffening and Panel Shape on energy Absorbing Capacity of Hysteretic Damper Made of SS400 Steel,” Journal of Constructional Steel, Vol.8, pp. 117-124, 2000 (in Japanese).
  18. [18]  H. Koga, A. Kunisue, H. Tamai, K. Kondoh, and M. Hanai, “Application of hysteretic damper to tall building (Part I-III),” Summaries of Technical papers of Annual meeting AIJ, B, pp. 1047-1052, 1994 (in Japanese).
  19. [19]  H. Koga, H. Tamai, K. Kondoh, and M. Hanai, “Fatigue Life Prediction of Hysteretic Damper under Severe Earthquake Ground Motion (Part I-II),” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 389-392, 1995 (in Japanese).
  20. [20]  H. Koga, “Fundamental Study on Mechanical Properties of Hysteretic Damper Installed in Braced Frame,” Master Thesis, Hiroshima Univ, 1996 (in Japanese).
  21. [21]  M. Kondou, N. Kubota, Y. Kobayashi H. Sugitani, and K. Masuo, “Experimental Study on Shear Panel Using Low Yield Strength Steel,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 731-732, 1999 (in Japanese).
  22. [22]  J. Malley and E. P. Popov, “Shear Links in Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.110, No.9, pp. 2275-2295, 1984.
  23. [23]  S. S. Manson, Thermal Stress and Low Cycle Fatigue. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 125-192, 1966.
  24. [24]  M. A. Miner, “Cumulative damage in fatigue,” J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME, Vol.67, pp. 159-164, 1945.
  25. [25]  H. Narihara and T. Nakagomi, “Low Cycle Fatigue Curves of Shear Panel Type Hysteretic Damper made of Low Yield Stress Steel,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 627-628, 2001 (in Japanese).
  26. [26]  P. W. Richards and C. M. Uang, “Effect of Flange Width-Thickness Ratio on Eccentrically Braced Frames Link Cyclic Rotation Capacity,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.131, No.10, pp. 1546-1552, 2005.
  27. [27]  H. Ryujin, K. Fujinami, T. Yamasaki, H. Tamai, et al., “Very Low Cycle Fatigue Test of Shear Resistance Member Made of SN400B Steel, Part 1, Part 2,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 747-750, 1997 (in Japanese).
  28. [28]  S. Sekine, Y. Shinabe, and Y. Takahashi, “Experimental Study on the Modeling Restoring Force Characteristics of the Shear Resistance Y type Seismic Member, part 3 Low Cycle Fatigue of Low Yield Stress Steel,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 807-808, 1996 (in Japanese).
  29. [29]  H. Takenaka, O. Chiba, S. Yamaguchi, et al., “Experimental Study on Damping member with Low Yield Strength Steel, Part 3 Results of Single Level Loading Tests,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 789-790, 1998 (in Japanese).
  30. [30]  J. Tagami, H. Yoshida, H. Kihara, S. Torii, et al., “Dynamic Loading Test of Shear Panel using Low Yield Strength Steel,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 777-778, 1998.
  31. [31]  H. Tamai, K. Kondoh, and M. Hanai, “On Low-Cycle-Fatigue Characteristics of Hysteretic Damper and Its Fatigue Life Prediction under Severe Earthquake Ground Motion,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No.462, pp. 141-150, 1994 (in Japanese).
  32. [32]  H. Tamai, “On Equivalent Shear Buckling Deformation Angle For Shear Panel Damper,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol.80, No.707, pp. 137-145, 2015 (in Japanese).
  33. [33]  H. Tsukatani, K. Koiwa, N. Sawada, H. Kaneko, and N. Suzuki, “Experimental Study on Low Cycle Fatigue Characteristics for Low Yield Strength Steel Shear Panel,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 615-616, 2001 (in Japanese).
  34. [34]  T. Ueki, T. Katayama, H. Kamura, et al., “Study on Shear Wall Damper Panel using Low Yield Strength Steel, Part1, Part2,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, C, III, pp. 769-772, 1999 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 18, 2019