JDR Vol.7 No.sp pp. 446-457
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2012.p0446


Tsunami Vertical Evacuation Buildings – Lessons for International Preparedness Following the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami

Stuart Fraser*1, Graham S. Leonard*2, Hitomi Murakami*3,
and Ichiro Matsuo*4

*1Joint Centre for Disaster Research, GNS Science / Massey University, P.O. Box 756, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*2GNS Science, New Zealand
*3Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Japan
*4Crisis & Environment Management Policy Institute (CeMI), Japan

April 24, 2012
July 18, 2012
tsunami vertical evacuation, Great East Japan Tsunami, preparedness, community engagement, evacuee welfare, evacuation signage

Tsunami vertical evacuation is an important strategy for enhancing disaster preparedness because it provides an alternative to evacuation inland or to high ground in areas at risk of local tsunami. A large number of tsunami vertical evacuation buildings provided safe refuge in the inundation zone during and immediately after the Great East Japan tsunami on March 11th 2011. This paper discusses observations of such buildings in connection with themes that arose during semi-structured interviews with local disaster prevention and emergency services officials in Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures in October 2011. The implementation of key factors in the development of tsunami vertical evacuation strategies are assessed with reference to previously published guidelines, enabling lessons to be applied in the current and future development of such strategies internationally. The most important factors for designating tsunami vertical evacuation buildings are that they be reinforced concrete construction with sufficient height in relation to inundation depth. Also important to the success of such vertical evacuation strategies are community engagement, building owner agreement, consistent and clear signage, 24-hour access and evacuee welfare.

  1. [1] Cabinet Office Government of Japan, “Guideline for Tsunami Evacuation Buildings,” Tokyo, 2005.
  2. [2] FEMA, “Guidelines for Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation from Tsunamis, FEMA Report 646,” Redwood City, California, 2008.
  3. [3] FEMA, “Vertical Evacuation from Tsunamis: A Guide for Community Officials, FEMA Report 646A,” Redwood City, California, 2009.
  4. [4] K. Fujima, F. Achmad, Y. Shigihara, and N. Mizutani, “Estimation of Tsunami Force Acting on Rectangular Structures,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.4, No.6, pp. 404-409, 2009.
  5. [5] P. Lukkunaprasit, N. Thanasisathit, and H. Yeh, “Experimental Verification of FEMA P646 Tsunami Loading,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.4, No.6, pp. 410-418, 2009.
  6. [6] P. Lukkunaprasit, A. Ruangrassamee, and N. Thanasisathit, “Tsunami Loading on Buildings with Openings,” Science of Tsunami Hazards, Vol.28, No.5, pp. 303-310, 2009.
  7. [7] H. Yeh, “Design Tsunami Forces for Onshore Structures,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 531-536, 2007.
  8. [8] S. Yagi and Y. Hasemi, “Requirements and Verification Methodology for the Design Performance of Tsunami-Hinan Buildings (Temporary Tsunami Refuge Building),” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.5, No.5, pp. 591-600, 2010.
  9. [9] N. Mori, T. Takahashi, T. Yasuda, and H. Yanagisawa, “Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.38, No.September, pp. 6-11, Sep. 2011.
  10. [10] S. A. Fraser, G. S. Leonard, H.Murakami, and I.Matsuo, “Tsunami Evacuation: Lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami of March 11th 2011,” GNS Science Report 2012/17, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 2012.
  11. [11] EEFIT, “The Mw9.0 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami of 11th March 2011 – A field report by EEFIT,” Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team, IStructE, London, UK, 2011.
  12. [12] S. A. Fraser, A. Raby, A. Pomonis, K. Goda, S. C. Chian, J. Macabuag, M. Offord, K. Saito, and P. Sammonds, “Tsunami damage to coastal defences and buildings in theMarch 11th 2011 Mw9.0 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10.1007/s10518-012-9348-9.
  13. [13] T. Rossetto, et al., “The Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004: observations in Sri Lanka and Thailand,” Natural Hazards, Vol.42, No.1, pp. 105-124, Nov. 2006.
  14. [14] P. Lukkunaprasit and A. Ruangrassamee, “Building damage in Thailand in the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and clues for tsunamiresistant design,” The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 17-30, Jan. 2008.
  15. [15] American Society of Civil Engineers, “More Evidence of Overwhelmed Seawalls,” ASCE Japan Tsunami Reconnaissance Team – Day 3, 2011 [Online],
    Available: [Accessed: 30-Jun-2011].
  16. [16] D. Lignos, “Effects of the 2011 Tohoku Japan Earthquake on Steel Structures,” EERI Team Field Blog, 03-Aug-2011 [Online],
    Available: [Accessed: 17-Feb-2012]
  17. [17] The Kahoku Shimpo, “Tragedy of Public Shizugawa hospital, Minami-Sanriku.,” The Kahoku Shimpo, 07-Jun-2011.
  18. [18] Y. Goto, M. Affan, Y. Nurdin, and D. K. Yuliana, “Tsunami Evacuation Simulation for Disaster Education and City Planning,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 92-101, 2012.
  19. [19] F. Imamura, A. Muhari, E. Mas, M. H. Pradono, J. Post, and M. Sugimoto, “Tsunami Disaster Mitigation by Integrating Comprehensive Countermeasures in Padang City, Indonesia,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 48-64, 2012.
  20. [20] N. J. Wood and M. C. Schmidtlein, “Anisotropic path modeling to assess pedestrian-evacuation potential from Cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest,” Natural Hazards, Oct. 2011.
  21. [21] NPO CeMI, “Northeastern Pacific Ocean off the coast earthquake: Preliminary analysis of questionnaire survey on tsunami,” Tokyo, Japan, 2011.
  22. [22] L. Dengler, “The Role of Education in the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program,” Natural Hazards, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 141-153, May 2005.
  23. [23] D. M. Johnston, D. Paton, G. L. Crawford, K. R. Ronan, B. F. Houghton, and P. Borgelt, “Measuring Tsunami Preparedness in CoastalWashington, United States,” Natural Hazards, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 173-184, May 2005.
  24. [24] Project Safe Haven, “Project Safe Haven: Tsunami vertical evacuation on the Washington coast – Grays Harbor County,” Seattle, Washington, 2011.
  25. [25] Project Safe Haven, “Project Safe Haven: Tsunami vertical evacuation on the Washington coast – Pacific County,” Seattle, Washington, 2011.
  26. [26] G. S. Leonard et al., “Scoping study for evaluating the tsunami vulnerability of New Zealand buildings for use as evacuation structures,” GNS Science Report 2011/36, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 2011.
  27. [27] MCDEM, “Tsunami Evacuation Zones. Director’s Guideline for Civil Defence Emergency Management Groups [DGL 08/08],” Wellington, New Zealand, 2008.
  28. [28] U. Sharma and A. Patt, “Disaster warning response: the effects of different types of personal experience,” Natural Hazards, Vol.60, No.2, pp. 409-423, 2012.
  29. [29] “Reaction project for the 2011 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake,” 2011 [Online],
    Available: data/index e.html [Accessed: 07-Jul-2012]
  30. [30] The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group, “The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Information – Field Survey Results. Coastal Engineering Committee of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers.,” 2011 [Online],
    Available: survey results [Accessed: 18-Nov-2011].
  31. [31] Fire and Disaster Management Agency of Japan, “Report 144 on the effects of the March 11, 2011 Great Tōhoku earthquake, February 14 2012,” 2012.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 27, 2016