JACIII Vol.27 No.4 pp. 720-725
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2023.p0720

Research Paper:

Mixed Dissipativity Control and Disturbance Rejection for Singular Systems

Fang Gao*,**,† ORCID Icon and Wenbin Chen*,** ORCID Icon

*School of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University
189 Jiuhuanan Road, Wuhu City, Anhui Province 241000, China

**Anhui Conch Group Company Limited
189 Jiuhuanan Road, Wuhu City, Anhui Province 241000, China

Corresponding author

March 9, 2023
April 28, 2023
July 20, 2023
dissipativity control, improved equivalent input disturbance, singular system, admissible

In this study, for a linear singular system, the dissipativity and disturbance-rejection problems are considered simultaneously. An improved equivalent-input-disturbance (IEID) method has shown good disturbance-rejection performance for linear systems. Therefore, the objective of this study is to obtain a satisfactory disturbance-rejection performance and dissipativity performance level based on the IEID method for singular systems. First, the influence of exogenous disturbances on the system is estimated based on the IEID method. The estimate is added to the control input channel to offset this influence. A necessary and sufficient condition is obtained to ensure that the singular system is admissible and satisfies dissipativity performance level. Subsequently, a state-feedback controller is designed based on the admissibility condition. Finally, a numerical example is used to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.

Cite this article as:
F. Gao and W. Chen, “Mixed Dissipativity Control and Disturbance Rejection for Singular Systems,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.27 No.4, pp. 720-725, 2023.
Data files:
  1. [1] G. Wang, Q. Zhang, and X. Yan, “Analysis and design of singular markovian jump systems,” Springer Int. Publishing, 2014.
  2. [2] V. N. Phat and N. H. Sau, “On exponential stability of linear singular positive delayed systems,” Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol.38, pp. 67-72, 2014.
  3. [3] D. Efimov, A. Polyakov, and J.-P. Richard, “Interval observer design for estimation and control of time-delay descriptor systems,” European J. of Control, Vol.23, pp. 26-35, 2015.
  4. [4] M. Chadli and M. Darouach, “Admissibility of singular switched systems: LMI formulation,” Proc. of IFAC World Congress, Milano, 2011.
  5. [5] Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Z. Ai, “A novel stability criterion of the time-lag fractional-order gene regulatory network system for stability analysis,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol.66, pp. 96-108, 2019.
  6. [6] Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Ai, and F. Liu, “Novel stability results of multivariable fractional-order system with time delay,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol.157, Article No.111943, 2022.
  7. [7] S. Mohanapriya, R. Sakthivel, O. M. Kwon, and S. M. Anthoni, “Disturbance rejection for singular markovian jump systems with time-varying delay and nonlinear uncertainties,” Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems, Vol.33, pp. 130-142, 2019.
  8. [8] J. C. Willems, “Dissipative dynamical systems part i: General theory,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol.45, No.5, pp. 321-351, 1972.
  9. [9] Z. Li, J. Wang, and H. Shao, “Delay-dependent dissipative control for linear time-delay systems,” J. of Franklin Institute, Vol.339, pp. 529-542, 2002.
  10. [10] W.-J. Lin, Y. He, C.-K. Zhang, F. Long, and M. Wu, “Dissipativity analysis for neural networks with two-delay components using an extended reciprocally convex matrix inequality,” Information Sciences, Vol.450, pp. 169-181, 2018.
  11. [11] J.-H. She, M. Fang, Y. Ohyama, H. Hashimoto, and M. Wu, “Improving disturbance-rejection performance based on an equivalent-input-disturbance approach,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.55, No.1, pp. 380-389, 2008.
  12. [12] J.-H. She, X. Xin, and Y. Pan, “Equivalent-input-disturbance approach-analysis and application to disturbance rejection in dual-stage feed drive control system,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 330-340, 2011.
  13. [13] F. Gao, M. Wu, J. She, and Y. He, “Delay-dependent guaranteed-cost control based on combination of Smith predictor and equivalent-input disturbance approach,” ISA Trans., Vol.62, pp. 215-221, 2016.
  14. [14] M. Wu, F. Gao, J. H. She, and W. H. Cao, “Active disturbance rejection in switched neutral-delay systems based on equivalent-input-disturbance approach,” IET Control Theory & Applications, Vol.10, No.18, pp. 2387-2393, 2016.
  15. [15] F. Gao, M. Wu, J. She, and W. Cao, “Disturbance rejection in nonlinear systems based on equivalent-input-disturbance approach,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol.282, pp. 244-532, 2016.
  16. [16] F. Gao, M. Wu, J. She, and W. Cao, “Active disturbance rejection in affine nonlinear systems based on equivalent-input-disturbance approach,” Asian J. of Control, Vol.19, No.5, pp. 1767-1776, 2017.
  17. [17] P. Yu, M. Wu, J. She, K.-Z. Liu, and Y. Nakanishi, “An improved equivalent-input-disturbance approach for repetitive control system with state delay and disturbance,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.65, No.1, pp. 521-531, 2018.
  18. [18] S. Xu and J. Lam, “Robust control and filtering of singular systems,” Springer, Berlin, 2006.
  19. [19] J. She, Y. Pan, H. Hashimoto, and M. Wu, “Comparison of disturbance rejection performance between sliding-mode control and equivalent-input-disturbance approach,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Mechatronics, pp. 949-954, 2011.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 23, 2024