JACIII Vol.22 No.6 pp. 846-852
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2018.p0846


Modeling the Effect of Interest Rate Uncertainty on Residents’ Consumption – Based on a DSGE Model Embedded Stochastic Volatility

Xiaowen Hu, Chengchen Hu, and Yiyu Yao

School of Economic and Management, Anhui Normal University
189 Huajin South Road, Wuhu City, Anhui 241002, China

Corresponding author

October 1, 2017
December 28, 2017
October 20, 2018
interest rate uncertainty, household consumption, stochastic volatility, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model

Modeling the effect of uncertainty shock usually employs VAR method. The approach however often leads to the results unstable with different structural equations. Especially it is modeled without a microscopic basis which often implies wrong policy advice. A new method to model the effect of interest rate uncertainty is proposed in this paper that overcomes this limitation. A stochastic volatility model is embedded into a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium framework to study the influence of interest rate uncertainty on the residents’ consumption. Using the third-order perturbation method to identify the impact of interest rate uncertainty on consumption. It is found by simulation that with the interest rate uncertainty increased, the consumption of residents in the current period has obviously decreased due to the preventive saving mechanism. Variance analysis shows that interest rate uncertainty shocks can explain 8% share of consumption volatility. The empirical results are robust when changing the parameter values and the prior distribution of the parameters. The conclusion shows the government should strengthen to guide the public reasonable expectations, to avoid the negative impact of interest rate uncertainty.

Cite this article as:
X. Hu, C. Hu, and Y. Yao, “Modeling the Effect of Interest Rate Uncertainty on Residents’ Consumption – Based on a DSGE Model Embedded Stochastic Volatility,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.22, No.6, pp. 846-852, 2018.
Data files:
  1. [1] P. Xie and Q. W. Yuan, “Effects of Interest Rate Policy in China in Recent Years,” Finance Research, Vol.5, pp. 1-13, 2003.
  2. [2] P. Shen and K. Liu, “Empirical Analysis of Excessive Sensitivity of Chinese Urban Residents’ Consumption Behavior: Concurrently on Uncertainty, Liquidity Constraint and Interest Rate,” World Economy, Vol.1, pp. 61-66, 2003.
  3. [3] G. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Niu, “Liquidity Constraints, Uncertainty and Consumption of Chinese Residents,” Economic Research, Vol.11, pp. 35-44, 2001.
  4. [4] X. Zang and D. Liu, “Study on the Relationship between Interest Rate Lever and Resident Consumption-Savings Substitution,” Nankai Economic Research, Vol.6, pp. 3-8, 2003.
  5. [5] Z. Y. Xiao and L. L. Ma, “Evaluation of Interest Rate and Consumption Behavior of Urban Residents in China,” Finance Research, Vol.3, pp. 94-102, 2006.
  6. [6] B. Zhang, J. Fang, and H. Shen, “Study on Interest Rate Risk and Consumption Behavior of Chinese Residents,” J. of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Vol.1, pp. 21-26, 2009.
  7. [7] D. Yi and J. Bai, “Study on the Impact of China’s Interest Rate Fluctuation on Unemployment,” Economic Theory and Economic Management, Vol.3, pp. 12-19, 2009.
  8. [8] P. Evans, “The effects on output of money growth and interest rate volatility in the United States,” The J. of Political Economy, Vol.6, pp. 204-222, 1984.
  9. [9] J. A. Tatom, “Interest rate variability and economic performance: Further evidence,” J. of Political Economy, Vol.93, No.5, pp. 1008-1018, 1985.
  10. [10] J. E. Ingersoll and S. A. Ross, “Waiting to invest: Investment and uncertainty,” J. of Business, Vol.4, pp. 1-29, 1992.
  11. [11] A. Episcopos, “Evidence on the relationship between uncertainty and irreversible investment,” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 41-52, 1995.
  12. [12] N. Bloom, “The impact of uncertainty shocks,” Econometrica, Vol.77, No.3, pp. 623-685, 2009.
  13. [13] J. Fernández-Villaverde, P. A. Guerrón-Quintana, K. Kuester, and J. Rubio-Ramírez, “Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity,” National Bureau of Economic Research, No.w17317, 2011.
  14. [14] M. M. Andreasen, “On the effects of rare disasters and uncertainty shocks for risk premia in non-linear DSGE models,” Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol.15, No.3, pp. 295-316, 2012.
  15. [15] B. Benjamin and P. Johannes, “Policy Risk and the Business Cycle,” Working Paper Series, No.4336, 2011.
  16. [16] G. Q. Dai and F. T. Liang, “Experimental Analysis of China’s Financial Market Benchmark Interest Rate Choice,” World Economy, Vol.4, pp. 3-11, 2006.
  17. [17] P. Xie and X. Luo, “Taylor rule and its test in China’s monetary policy,” Economic Research, Vol.3, pp. 3-12, 2002.
  18. [18] W. Li and X. Li, “Interest Rate Smoothing and Output, Price Fluctuation – A Study Based on Taylor’s Rule,” Nankai Economic Research, Vol.1, pp. 36-50, 2010.
  19. [19] R. Meyer and J. Yu, “BUGS for a Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models,” The Econometrics J., Vol.3, Issue 2, pp. 198-215, 2000.
  20. [20] G. A. Calvo, “Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework,” J. of Monetary Economics, Vol.12, No.3, pp. 383-398, 1983.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 20, 2018