single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.17 No.3 pp. 377-385
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2013.p0377
(2013)

Paper:

Characterization of Multiple-Valued Logic for Dealing with Ambiguity

Noboru Takagi

Department of Intelligent Systems Design Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, 5180 Kurokawa Imizu-shi, Toyama 939-0398, Japan

Received:
July 30, 2012
Accepted:
February 14, 2013
Published:
May 20, 2013
Keywords:
multiple-valued logic, fuzzy logic, ambiguity, monotone function, hazard detection
Abstract
This paper focuses on r-valued functions monotonic in a partial order relation, which can be interpreted as a relation expressing something about ambiguity. First, necessary and sufficient conditions for an r-valued function to be monotonic in the relation are clarified. After that, minimal and maximal information loss functions are defined as a special part of r-valued functions monotonic in the relation. We describe a practical application of minimal information loss functions that correct input failures in multiple-valued logic circuits.
Cite this article as:
N. Takagi, “Characterization of Multiple-Valued Logic for Dealing with Ambiguity,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.17 No.3, pp. 377-385, 2013.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. C. Kleene, “Introduction to Metamathematics,” North-Holland Pub., pp. 332-340, 1952.
  2. [2] M. Mukaidono, “Regular Ternary Logic Functions – Ternary Logic Functions Suitable for Treating Ambiguity,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol.C-35, No.2, pp. 179-183, 1986.
  3. [3] M. Mukaidono, “On the Mathematical Structure of the C-type Fail Safe Logic,” IECE Trans., Vol.52-C, No.12, pp. 812-819, 1969.
  4. [4] M. Mukaidono, “The B-ternary logic and its application to the detection of hazards in combinational switching circuits,” Proc. of the 8th Int. Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, pp. 269-275, 1978.
  5. [5] Y. Yamamoto and M. Mukaidono, “P-functions – ternary logic functions capable of correcting input failures and suitable for treating ambiguities,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol.41, No.1, pp. 28-35, 1992.
  6. [6] M. Mukaidono and I. G. Rosenberg, “k-valued Function for Treating Ambiguities – Their Clone and a Normal Form,” Proc. of the 16th Int. Symposium onMultiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, pp. 204-211, 1986.
  7. [7] I. G. Rosenberg, “Completeness properties of multiple-valued logic algebras,” D. C. Rine (Ed.), Computer Science and Multiple-Valued Logic, North-Holland, pp. 150-192, 1984.
  8. [8] E. L. Post, “Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions,” American J. of Mathematics, Vol.43, pp. 163-185, 1921.
  9. [9] K. Ibuki, K. Naemura, and A. Nozaki, “The general theory of complete sets of logical functions,” IECE Trans., Vol.46, No.7, pp. 42-48, 1963.
  10. [10] J. C. Muzio and T. C. Wesselkamper, “Multiple-Valued Switching Theory,” Adam Hilger Ltd., pp. 63-100, 1986.
  11. [11] G. Epstein, “Multiple-Valued Logic Design: An Introduction,” Institute of Physics Publishing, pp. 124-153, 1993.
  12. [12] J. A. Brzozowski and C. H. Seger, “Asynchronous Circuits,” Springer-Verlag, 1995.
  13. [13] J. A. Brzozowski and Z. Esik, “Hazard algebras,” Formal Methods in System Design, Vol.23, Issue 3, pp. 233-256, 2003.
  14. [14] N. Takagi, “A delay model of multiple-valued logic circuits consisting of min, max, and literal operations,” IEICE Trans. on Information and Systems, Vol.E93-D, No.8, pp. 2040-2047, 2010.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 18, 2024