JACIII Vol.16 No.3 pp. 462-468
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2012.p0462


Division of Iterative-Transportation Based on Local Observation by Multiple Mobile Robots

Yuichi Kobayashi*, Yuta Sato**, and Manabu Gouko***

*Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-14-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan

**The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated, 1-1-3 Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

***Tohoku Gakuin University, 1-13-1 Chuo, Tagajo, Miyagi 985-8537, Japan

October 6, 2011
February 3, 2012
May 20, 2012
multiple robots, iterative transportation, decentralized control, local observation
This paper deals with a framework of decentralized approach to division of labor by multiple mobile robots. An iterative-transportation task by multiple robots with multiple sets of starts (pick-up place of the object) and goals (put down place) is considered as the task. On each route between a start and a goal, the efficiency of transportation improves when the number of robots increases. Due to jams, however, excessive number of robots on the same route causes inefficiency. We propose a control law of each robot to choose an appropriate route so as to optimize the total efficiency of the transportation, where each robot utilizes information which can be obtained only by local observation (without any explicit communication among robots). The proposed control is based on the estimation of the number of robots on the routes in the future. In simulation, it was verified that the proposed control law realized 96% efficiency of the fully centralized control by appropriately choosing the route, compared with the case where global information can be utilized.
Cite this article as:
Y. Kobayashi, Y. Sato, and M. Gouko, “Division of Iterative-Transportation Based on Local Observation by Multiple Mobile Robots,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.16 No.3, pp. 462-468, 2012.
Data files:
  1. [1] Y. Ikemoto, T. Miura, and H. Asama, “Adaptive Division of Labor Control for Robot Group,” IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2409-2414, 2009.
  2. [2] J. H. Lee and B. H. Lee, “Real time traffic control scheme of multiple AGV systems for collision free minimum time motion: a routing table approach,” IEEE Trans. on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998.
  3. [3] L. Lin et al., “Network model and effective evolutionary approach for AGV dispatching in manufacturing system,” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.17, No.4, pp. 465-477, 2006.
  4. [4] Y. Yoshimura, J. Ota, K. Inoue, D. Kurabayashi, and T. Arai, “Iterative Transportation Planning of Multiple Objects by Cooperative Mobile Robots,” Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems 2, H. Asama, T. Fukuda, T. Arai, and I. Endo (Eds.), Springer, pp. 171-182, 1996.
  5. [5] H. Asama, K. Ozaki, A. Matsumoto, Y. Ishida, and I. Endo, “Development of Task Assignment System Using Communication for Multiple Autonomous Robots,” J. Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.4 No.2, pp. 122-127, 1992.
  6. [6] T.Mizuguchi and K. Sugawara, “Proportion Regulation in Task Allocation Systems,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, Vol.89, No.10, pp. 2745-2751, 2006.
  7. [7] S. Tadaki, K. Nishinari, M. Kikuchi, Y. Sugayama, and S. Yukawa, “Observation of Congested Two-lane Traffic Caused by a Tunnel,” J. of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol.71, No.9, pp. 2326-2334, 2002.
  8. [8] P. Chakroborty, “Models of Vehicular traffic: An engineering perspective,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 372, Issue 1, pp. 151-161, 2006.
  9. [9] Y. Sato and Y. Kobayashi, “Coooerative path optimization of multiple mobile robots using bio-inspired model,” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conf. of the Robotics Society of Japan, pp. 301-305, 2008. (in Japanese)
  10. [10] C. Shao and D. Hristu-Varsakelis, “Cooperative optimal control: broadening the reach of bio-inspiration,” Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 1-11, 2006.
  11. [11] M. Bando, K. Hasebe, K. Nakanishi, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama, “Phenomenological Study of Dynamical Model of Traffic Flow,” Journal de Physique I, Vol.5, No.11, pp. 1389-1399, 1995.
  12. [12] J. A. Marshall, M. E. Broucke, and B. A. Francis, “Formations of Vehicles in Cyclic Pursuit,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol.49, No.11, 2004.
  13. [13] V. Haggan and T. Ozaki, “Modeling nonlinear random vibrations using an amplitude-dependent autoregressive time series model,” Biometrika, Vol.68, No.1, pp. 189-196, 1981.
  14. [14] J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A simplex method for function minimization,” Computer J., Vol.7, pp. 308-313, 1965.
  15. [15] S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox, “Probabilistic Robotics,” MIT Press, 2005.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jun. 03, 2024