single-au.php

IJAT Vol.14 No.5 pp. 734-743
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2020.p0734
(2020)

Paper:

Computational Study on Strategyproofness of Resource Matching in Crowdsourced Manufacturing

Takafumi Chida*,**,†, Toshiya Kaihara**, Nobutada Fujii**, Daisuke Kokuryo**, and Yuma Shiho*

*Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd.
292 Yoshida-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 244-0817, Japan

Corresponding author

**Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

Received:
February 26, 2020
Accepted:
June 18, 2020
Published:
September 5, 2020
Keywords:
distributed production, resource matching, cooperative game theory
Abstract

The need for a sustainable society has grown rapidly. This trend requires new production system concepts following an era of mass customization. As one of these new concepts, “crowdsourced manufacturing” has attracted noticeable attention. In such systems, each participant shares their manufacturing resources for ecosystem co-prosperity, providing new value for the next society. To realize such a concept, it is important to (1) match resource requests and resource offers so as to achieve high efficiency, and (2) induce participants to act in a fair way. Previously, some studies showed production efficiency improvements. Nevertheless, relatively few studies have been conducted on induction mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to develop induction mechanisms for participants. Concerning induction mechanisms, we focus on two viewpoints: (a) matching stability, and (b) “strategyproofness.” These viewpoints are well-known concepts in the market design research field. We previously proposed a resource matching stability analysis method and mechanism for inducing participants to accept matching plans. Formally, a matching method is “strategyproof” when it is a dominant strategy for all participants to submit their true information. However, it is hard to satisfy this condition. Practically, it would be useful to evaluate the strength of an induction, even if the matching method is not strategyproof. In this study, we propose indices for showing the strength of induction (“strength of strategyproofness”). Subsequently, we evaluate matching methods, and show that participants will state false information to maximize their profit in a system with resource matching methods for the profit maximization of the entire system. As the resource providers, they can obtain greater profit by submitting false information regarding resource usage fees. Then, the profits of the resource requesters are unfairly impaired. Furthermore, we propose a new resource matching method, inspired from the “nucleolus” concept in cooperative game theory. The proposed method reduces the maximum dissatisfaction (i.e., profit loss) of resource requesters and resource providers, based on profit sharing. The computational results show that the proposed method induces participants to submit true information, while maintaining high production efficiency.

Cite this article as:
Takafumi Chida, Toshiya Kaihara, Nobutada Fujii, Daisuke Kokuryo, and Yuma Shiho, “Computational Study on Strategyproofness of Resource Matching in Crowdsourced Manufacturing,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14, No.5, pp. 734-743, 2020.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] PwC and the MIT Forum for Supply Chain Innovation (Ed.), “Supply Chain and Risk Management – Making the Right Risk Decisions to Strengthen Operations Performance,” 2013.
  2. [2] WMWi Website. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/industrie-40.html [Accessed February 10, 2020]
  3. [3] IIC Website. https://www.iiconsortium.org/ [Accessed February 10, 2020]
  4. [4] IVI Website, https://iv-i.org/wp/en/ [Accessed February 10, 2020]
  5. [5] The International Electrotechnical Commission (Ed.), “Factory of the Future,” 2015.
  6. [6] Y. Tanimizu, M. Yamanaka, C. Ozawa, K. Iwamura, and N. Sugimura, “A Study on Development of Adaptive Strategies in Dynamic Supply Chains: Proposal of a Framework and Two-Layered Models,” Trans. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series C, Vol.75, No.756, pp. 2351-2358, 2009 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] M. Moghaddam and S. Y. Nof, “Real-Time Optimization and Control Mechanisms for Collaborative Demand and Capacity Sharing,” Int. J. of Production Economics, Vol.171, No.4, pp. 495-506, 2016.
  8. [8] F. Tao, Y. Cheng, L. Zhang, and A. Y. C. Nee, “Advanced Manufacturing Systems: Socialization Characteristics and Trends,” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.28, No.5, pp. 1079-1094, 2017.
  9. [9] D. Wu, M. J. Greer, D. W. Rosen, and D. Schaefer, “Cloud Manufacturing : Strategic Vision and State-of-The-Art,” J. of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 564-579, 2013.
  10. [10] L. Monostori, J. Váncza, and S. R. T. Kumara, “Agent-Based Systems for Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.55, No.2, pp. 697-720, 2006.
  11. [11] L. Monostori, B. Kádár, T. Bauernhansl, S. Kondoh, S. Kumara, G. Reinhart, O. Sauer, G. Schuh, W. Sihn, and K. Ueda, “Cyber-Physical Systems in Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.65, No.2, pp. 621-641, 2016.
  12. [12] J. Váncza, L. Monostori, E. Lutters, S. R. Kumara, M. Tseng, P. Valckenaers, and H. V. Brussel, “Cooperative, Responsive Manufacturing Enterprises,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.60, No.2, pp. 797-820, 2011.
  13. [13] M. Freitag, T. Becker, and N. Duffie, “Dynamics of Resource Sharing in Production Networks,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.64, No.1, pp. 435-438, 2015.
  14. [14] T. Kaihara, Y. Katsumura, Y. Suginishi, and B. Kádár, “Simulation Model Study for Manufacturing Effectiveness Evaluation in Crowdsourced Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.66, No.1, pp. 445-448, 2017.
  15. [15] T. Kaihara, N. Nishino, K. Ueda, M. Tseng, J. Váncza, P. Schönsleben, R. Teti, and T. Takenaka, “Value Creation in Production: Reconsideration from Interdisciplinary Approaches,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.67, No.2, pp. 791-813, 2018.
  16. [16] H. Hibino, Y. Fukuda, and Y. Yura, “A Synchronization Mechanism with Shared Storage Model for Distributed Manufacturing Simulation Systems,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.3, pp. 248-260, 2015.
  17. [17] B. Kádár, P. Egri, G. Pedone, and T. Chida, “Smart, Simulation-Based Resource Sharing in Federated Production Networks,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.67, No.1, pp. 503-506, 2018.
  18. [18] Á. Szaller, P. Egri, and B. Kádár, “Trust-Based Resource Sharing Mechanism in Distributed Manufacturing,” Int. J. of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.33, No.1, pp. 1-21, 2019.
  19. [19] A. E. Roth and M. Sotomayor, “Two-Sided Matching,” R. J. Aumann and S. Hart (Eds.), “Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,” pp. 485-541, Elsevier, 1992.
  20. [20] T. Chida, T. Kaihara, N. Fujii, and D. Kokuryo, “Stability Analysis on Resource Matching in Crowdsourced Manufacturing,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.81, pp. 405-410, 2019.
  21. [21] T. Chida, T. Kaihara, N. Fujii, and D. Kokuryo, “A Proposal on Stability Improvement of Resource Matching in Crowdsourced Manufacturing,” Trans. of the JSME, Vol.86, No.881, 19-00205, doi: 10.1299/transjsme.19-00205, 2020 (in Japanese).
  22. [22] S. Muto and M. Sugiyama, “Stable Set and Nucleolus in Cooperative Game Theory: An Example of Negotiations on Communication Satellites Business Alliances,” Operations Research as a Management Science, Vol.26, No.10, pp. 591-596, 1981 (in Japanese).
  23. [23] S. Kishimoto, “Introduction to cooperative game theory,” Operations Research as a Management Science, Vol.60, No.6, pp. 343-350, 2015 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 27, 2021