single-au.php

IJAT Vol.5 No.2 pp. 167-172
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2011.p0167
(2011)

Paper:

Simulation-Based Analysis of Influence of Error on Super-Resolution Optical Inspection

Ryota Kudo*, Shin Usuki**, Satoru Takahashi*,
and Kiyoshi Takamasu*

*Department of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

**Division of Global Research Leaders, Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu 432-8561, Japan

Received:
December 1, 2010
Accepted:
December 22, 2010
Published:
March 5, 2011
Keywords:
standing-wave illumination, image reconstruction, super-resolution
Abstract

Microfabricated structures such as semiconductors and MEMS continue shrinking as nanotechnology expands, demand that measures microfabricated structures has risen. Optics and electron beam have been mainly used for that purpose, but the resolving power of optics is limited by the Rayleigh limit and it is generally low for subwavelength-geometry defects, while scanning electron microscopy requires a vacuum and induces contamination in measurement. To handle these considerations, we propose optical microfabrication inspection using a standing-wave shift. This is based on a super-resolution algorithm in which the inspection resolution exceeds the Rayleigh limit by shifting standing waves with a piezoelectric actuator. While resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit by proposed method has been studied theoretically and realized experimentally, we must understand the influence of experimental error factors and reflect this influence in the calibration when actual application is constructed. The standing-wave pitch, initial phase, and noise were studied as experimental error factors. As a result, it was confirmed that super-resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit is achievable if (i) standingwave pitch error was 5% when standing-wave pitch was 300 nm or less and (ii) if initial phase error was 30° when standing-wave pitch was 300 nm. Noise accumulation was confirmed in studies of the noise effect, and a low-pass filter proved effective against noise influence.

Cite this article as:
R. Kudo, S. Usuki, S. Takahashi, and <. Takamasu, “Simulation-Based Analysis of Influence of Error on Super-Resolution Optical Inspection,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.2, pp. 167-172, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] “International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Metrology (2008 update),” Semiconductor Industry Association.
  2. [2] M. A. Schulze, M. A. Hunt, E. Voelkl, J. D. Hickson, W. Usry, R. G. Smith, R. Bryant, and C. E. (Tommy) Thomas Jr., “Semiconductor wafer defect detection using digital holography,” Proc. SPIE’s Advanced Microelectronic Micromanufacturing, 27-28, February, 2003.
  3. [3] G.W.Mulholland and T. A. Germer, “Modeling, Measurement, and Standards for Wafer Inspection,” Proc. the Government Microcircuits Applications and Critical Technologies (GOMACTech) Conf., March 31 to April 3, 2003.
  4. [4] K.Watanabe, S.Maeda, T. Funakoshi, and Y. Miyazaki, “DUV Optical Wafer Inspection System for 65-nm Technology Node,” Hitachi Review, Vol.54, No.1, pp. 22-26, 2005.
  5. [5] V. Westphal and S. W. Hell, “Nanoscale Resolution in the Focal Plane of an Optical Microscope,” PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 94, 143903(2005), 1.
  6. [6] H. Nishioka, S. Takahashi, and K. Takamasu, “A Super-Resolution Microscopy with Standing Evanescent Light and Image Reconstruction Method,” Proc. of IMEKO World Congress, 12, TC2, 2006.
  7. [7] S. Usuki, H. Nishioka, S. Takahashi, and K. Takamasu, “Superresolution optical inspection for semiconductor defects using standing wave shift,” SPIE Int. Symposium on Optmechatronic Technologies 2005, pp. 60490C-1-60490C-11, 2005.
  8. [8] R. Kudo, S. Usuki, S. Takahashi, and K. Takamasu, “Fundamental verification for 2-dimensional super-resolution optical inspection for semiconductor defects by using standing wave illumination shift,” The XIX World Congress IMEKO 2009, TC2-354, 106-111, 2009.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 18, 2019