IJAT Vol.3 No.1 pp. 99-106
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2009.p0099


Quasi-Minimum Time Trajectory Planning Method of Robot Arm with Electromagnetic Attraction Hand Using Genetic Algorithm and Experiments

Yusuke Mutsuura*, Hiroyuki Kojima*, Yuuichi Takeuchi*, and Hiroki Saitou**

*Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Gunma University
1-5-1 Tenjincho, Kiryu, Gunma 376-8515, Japan

**Tokyo Rhythm Watch Corporation
1-299-12 Kitabukuromachi, Omiya, Saitama 330-9551, Japan

October 21, 2008
November 10, 2008
January 5, 2009
electromagnetic attraction hand, quasi-minimum time trajectory planning, electromagnetic attraction transfer control, genetic algorithm
In this study, a quasi-minimum time trajectory planning method for the electromagnetic attraction transfer control of a magnetic object by use of a three-link robot arm with an electromagnetic attraction hand is proposed. The three joints of the robot arm are driven with reduction gears and DC motors. In the trajectory planning using a genetic algorithm, the magnetic object is assumed to be transferred along a linear trajectory, and the trajectory of the robot arm is formulated by use of a chromosome consisting of two genes. Then, the fitness function of the genetic algorithm for a quasi-minimum time trajectory planning is defined using two kinds of the constraint conditions as to the allowable maximum moment applied to the magnetic object and the allowable maximum DC motor torque. Furthermore, the numerical calculations and the experiments have been carried out, and the usefulness of the present quasi-minimum time trajectory planning method is confirmed theoretically and experimentally.
Cite this article as:
Y. Mutsuura, H. Kojima, Y. Takeuchi, and H. Saitou, “Quasi-Minimum Time Trajectory Planning Method of Robot Arm with Electromagnetic Attraction Hand Using Genetic Algorithm and Experiments,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.3 No.1, pp. 99-106, 2009.
Data files:
  1. [1] C. S. Lin, P. R. Chang, and J. Y. S. Luh, “Formulation and optimization of cubic polynomial joint trajectories for industrial robots,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol.AC-28, No.12, pp. 1066-1074, 1983.
  2. [2] B. Tondu and S. A. Bazaz, “The three-cubic method: an optimal online robot joint trajectory generator under velocity,” acceleration, and wandering constraints, The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, Vol.18, No.9, pp. 893-901, 1999.
  3. [3] T. Izumi, “Path Planning for Saving Energy of a Manipulator in PTP Motions,” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.18, No.7, pp. 972-978, 2000.
  4. [4] D. Knjazew, “OmeGA (A component genetic algorithm for solving permutation and scheduling problems),” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
  5. [5] E. Shintaku, “Minimum energy trajectory for an underwater manipulator and its simple planning method by using genetic algorithm,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.13, No.2, pp. 115-138, 1999.
  6. [6] H. Kojima and T. Kibe, “Residual Vibration Reduction Control of a Two-Link Flexible Robot Arm Using Optimal Trajectory Planning based on Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.19, No.7, pp. 905-912, 2001.
  7. [7] L. Tian and C. Collins, “An effective robot trajectory planning method using a genetic algorithm,” Mechatronics, Vol.14, pp. 455-470, 2004.
  8. [8] H. Kojima, Y. Hashimoto, Y. Kuwano, K. Abe, and H. Hosoya, “Trajectory Planning of Semiconductor Wafer Transfer Robot Arm Driven by stepping Motors Using Genetic Algorithm and Experiments,” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.25, No.5, pp. 102-110, 2007.
  9. [9]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 19, 2024