The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction calls for inclusive and people-centered approaches, yet significant gaps persist between normative commitments and their realization in everyday governance. This paper examines Phase I of a Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) technical cooperation project implemented under Japan’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) framework in Ecuador and argues that the project advances Sendai Framework and Beyond by translating inclusion into institutionalized disaster risk reduction (DRR) practice through curriculum-based capacity development. Grounded in the social model of disablement, functional perspectives informed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and disaster sociology on the social production of risk, the study conceptualizes inclusive DRR as a form of localized governance capacity embedded in routine welfare and administrative practice. Phase I employed a systematic curriculum integrating conceptual learning, practitioner-oriented materials, practical tools, and reflective assignments. A Spanish-language practitioner booklet, produced in-house by the JICA Ecuador Office, functioned as a modular backbone linking learning modules to applied governance tasks. The analysis shows that Phase I’s most significant achievement was the institutionalization of inclusive DRR. In four model municipalities, inclusive DRR ordinances were enacted and accompanied by permanent budget allocations, embedding inclusion within local governance structures. At the national level, an inter-ministerial agreement between welfare and disaster management authorities formalized cross-sectoral collaboration. These outcomes marked a transition from project-based initiatives to routinized governance. At the same time, field-based evaluation identified substantial variation in operational workflows across municipalities, revealing the limits of institutionalization without standardized implementation procedures. This finding clarified the necessity of Phase II, which focuses on developing nationally applicable standard operating procedures expressed through operational workflow diagrams. The Ecuador case demonstrates that inclusive DRR advances through staged governance transformation: institutionalization establishes commitment, while standardization enables consistency and scalability. By sequencing these stages through learning-oriented ODA technical cooperation, the project provides a concrete example of how Sendai Framework and Beyond can be realized in practice.

1. [1] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), “Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030,” United Nations, 2015.
2. [2] D. Henstra and J. Thistlethwaite, “Overcoming barriers to meeting the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction,” Centre for Int. Governance Innovation (CIGI), 2017.
3. [3] L. M. Stough and I. Kelman, “People with disabilities and disasters,” H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, and J. E. Trainor (Eds.), “Handbook of disaster research,” (2nd ed), pp. 225-242, Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_12
4. [4] J. I. Kailes and A. Enders, “Moving beyond “special needs”: A function-based framework for emergency management and planning,” J. of Disability Policy Studies, Vol.17, Issue 4, pp. 230-237, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070170040601
5. [5] M. Oliver, “The politics of disablement,” Macmillan, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
6. [6] K. Tierney, “The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience,” Stanford University Press, 2014.
7. [7] S. Tatsuki, “Old age, disability, and the Tohoku-Oki earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol.29, No.S1, pp. S403-S432, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000126
8. [8] World Health Organization, “International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF),” WHO, 2001.
9. [9] B. Wisner, P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis, “At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters,” (2nd ed.) Routledge, 2004.
10. [10] S. Tatsuki, “Long-term life recovery processes among survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 life recovery social survey results,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.2, No.6, pp. 484-501, 2007. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2007.p0484
11. [11] S. Tatsuki and F. Kawami, “Longitudinal impacts of pre-existing inequalities and social environmental changes on life recovery: Results of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake and the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake recovery studies,” Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters, Vol.41, No.1, pp. 94-120, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/02807270231171504
12. [12] L. Dominelli, “Green social work: From environmental crises to environmental justice,” Polity Press, 2012.
13. [13] S. Tatsuki, “Persons with disabilities in the Great East Japan Earthquake,” L. Dominelli (Ed.), “The Routledge handbook of green social work,” Routledge, pp. 464-477, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183213
14. [14] S. Tatsuki, “Que nadie se quede atrás: Guía de prevención de desastres para personal del área social,” JICA Ecuador Office, Ecuador, i-BOSAI Folleto, No. 1, 2021, Spanish trans. of “Toward Disaster Risk Reduction That Leaves No One Behind: What Social Welfare Professionals Need to Learn,” Kizasu Shobo, 2020.
15. [15] S. Tatsuki, “Toward disaster risk reduction that leaves no one behind: What social welfare professionals need to learn,” Kizasu Shobo, 2020 (in Japanese).