single-rb.php

JRM Vol.38 No.5 pp. 1459-1471
(2026)

Paper:

Electropermanent Magnet Modular Boa (EMB): Reconfigurable Snake Robot with Magnetic Wall Interaction

Yuya Shimizu ORCID Icon, Yosuke Kita, So Shimooka ORCID Icon, and Tetsushi Kamegawa ORCID Icon

Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University
3-1-1 Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Received:
February 26, 2026
Accepted:
July 30, 2026
Published:
October 20, 2026
Keywords:
electropermanent magnet, modular robot, snake robot, connector design, reconfigurable robot
Abstract

Snake robots possess high mobility by leveraging their redundant degrees of freedom. However, it is challenging to optimize the degrees of freedom of conventional snake robots with fixed configurations for unknown environments and it is particularly difficult to maintain their operation by detaching failed joints. To enhance the environmental adaptability and fault tolerance of snake robots, in this study, we developed a modular snake robot capable of reconfiguring its degrees of freedom according to the situation. In our previous systems, even though the mechanical coupling mechanisms achieved robust connections, the systems were structurally complex at their interfaces. In contrast, even though magnetic coupling mechanisms resulted in simpler designs, the systems were susceptible to strong vibrations and shear loads during locomotion, which made it challenging to maintain stable electrical connections. To address these challenges, we developed the electropermanent magnet modular boa (EMB) in this study, which was a modular snake robot featuring hybrid connectors that balanced strong attraction forces via electropermanent magnet with mechanical support for shear loads through passive reinforcement pins. By ensuring the precise alignment of the reinforcement pins as positioning guides, we achieved simultaneous robust inter module coupling and electrical connectivity within a lightweight and simple structure. Furthermore, a unique feature of our hybrid connector is its dual functionality, where it can also be adapted for attachment to ferromagnetic surfaces, enabling both locomotion on ferromagnetic surfaces and module coupling with a single mechanism. We demonstrated the effectiveness of the physical EMB prototype based on characteristic evaluation of the standalone connector and locomotion experiments.

Details of the passive rod-lock mechanism and electrical contacts

Details of the passive rod-lock mechanism and electrical contacts

Cite this article as:
Y. Shimizu, Y. Kita, S. Shimooka, and T. Kamegawa, “Electropermanent Magnet Modular Boa (EMB): Reconfigurable Snake Robot with Magnetic Wall Interaction,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.38 No.5, pp. 1459-1471, 2026.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] J. K. Hopkins, B. W. Spranklin, and S. K. Gupta, “A survey of snake-inspired robot designs,” Bioinspir. Biomim., Vol.4, No.2, Article No.021001, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/4/2/021001
  2. [2] C. Wright, A. Buchan, B. Brown, J. Geist, M. Schwerin, D. Rollinson, M. Tesch, and H. Choset, “Design and architecture of the unified modular snake robot,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4347-4354, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225255
  3. [3] S. Hirose, “Biologically Inspired Robots: Snake-like Locomotors and Manipulators,” Oxford University Press, 1993.
  4. [4] M. Tanaka, M. Nakajima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Tanaka, “Development and Control of Articulated Mobile Robot for Climbing Steep Stairs,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.23, Issue 2, pp. 531-541, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2018.2792013
  5. [5] Q. Fu and C. Li, “Robotic modelling of snake traversing large, smooth obstacles reveals stability benefits of body compliance,” R. Soc. Open Sci., Vol.7, Issue 2, Article No.191192, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191192
  6. [6] T. Takemori, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Ladder Climbing with a Snake Robot,” 2018 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594411
  7. [7] T. Kamegawa, T. Harada, and A. Gofuku, “Realization of cylinder climbing locomotion with helical form by a snake robot with passive wheels,” 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3067-3072, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152862
  8. [8] T. Kamegawa, T. Baba, and A. Gofuku, “V-shift control for snake robot moving the inside of a pipe with helical rolling motion,” 2011 IEEE Int. Symp. on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSRR.2011.6106789
  9. [9] W. Qi, T. Kamegawa, and A. Gofuku, “Helical wave propagation motion for a snake robot on a vertical pipe containing a branch,” Artificial Life Robotics, Vol.23, pp. 515-522, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0479-1
  10. [10] J. Liu, X. Zhang, and G. Hao, “Survey on research and development of reconfigurable modular robots,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol.8, No.8, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016659597
  11. [11] P. Moubarak and P. Ben-Tzvi, “Modular and reconfigurable mobile robotics,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol.60, Issue 12, pp. 1648-1663, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2012.09.002
  12. [12] B. A. Elsayed, T. Takemori, and F. Matsuno, “Gait Recovery for a Snake Robot With Multiple Failed Joints,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.29, Issue 4, pp. 2625-2636, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2023.3334481
  13. [13] Y. Shimizu, Y. Kita, S. Shimooka, and T. Kamegawa, “Design of a Module for a Modular Snake Robot with 3D Locomotion,” 2025 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5553-5558, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11246453
  14. [14] Y. Kita, Y. Shimizu, S. Shimooka, and T. Kamegawa, “Prototype of a reconfigurable modular snake robot compatible with ROS,” Proc. the Robotics and Mechatronics Conf. 2025 (ROBOMECH 2025), Article No.1A1-J02, 2025 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] S. Murata, E. Yoshida, A. Kamimura, H. Kurokawa, K. Tomita, and S. Kokaji, “M-TRAN: Self-reconfigurable modular robotic system,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol.7, Issue 4, pp. 431-441, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2002.806220
  16. [16] R. Michikawa, K. Hosotani, Y. Shimizu, C. W. Chin, X. Wang, T. Hayakawa, R. Fujisawa, T. Kamegawa, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Development and verification of connectors for modular robots to complete practical tasks on the moon,” Artificial Life Robotics, Vol.30, pp. 198-207, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-024-00987-y
  17. [17] Y. Tu, G. Liang, and T. L. Lam, “FreeSN: A Freeform Strut-node Structured Modular Self-reconfigurable Robot – Design and Implementation,” 2022 Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4239-4245, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811583
  18. [18] G. Liang, H. Luo, M. Li, H. Qian, and T. L. Lam, “FreeBOT: A Freeform Modular Self-reconfigurable Robot with Arbitrary Connection Point – Design and Implementation,” 2020 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6506-6513, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341129
  19. [19] E. Bray and R. Groß, “Recent Developments in Self-Assembling Multi-Robot Systems,” Curr. Robot. Rep., Vol.4, pp. 101-116, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-023-00106-y
  20. [20] S. Ueno, M. Nakajima, and M. Tanaka, “Development of an articulated mobile robot moving on magnetic curved walls and passing over obstacles,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.36, Issue 21, pp. 1156-1171, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2022.2138720
  21. [21] A. Shinagawa, C. W. Chin, and M. Tanaka, “Development of multi-linked mobile robot MagSnake-3 capable of moving on magnetic curved walls,” Proc. the Robotics and Mechatronics Conf. 2025 (ROBOMECH 2025), Article No.1A1-A03, 2025 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 06, 2026