Programming education has been mandated in elementary schools in Japan since 2020. The Courses of Study indicate that programming should be incorporated into the field of electricity in science, emphasizing energy as a social issue and promoting the use of sensors and computers in education. This aligns with the integrated level of STEAM education. This study designed a programming learning activity focused on electric circuits to promote efficient energy use and developed teaching materials for students. Subsequently, the class practice was conducted, and the effects of the developed teaching materials and learning activities on the students were discussed from the perspective of STEAM educational practices through a quantitative text analysis. Consequently, the teaching materials provided an opportunity to learn integrated software and hardware, and the students showed an awareness of the devices around them that were controlled by programming. Meanwhile, the children were so focused on completing the program and building the circuit that they paid insufficient attention to the objective of exploring “ingenious ways to use energy without wasting it,” which had been set as an advanced integration goal of STEAM education.

1. [1] M. Sanders, “STEM, STEM education, STEMmania,” The Technology Teacher, Vol.68, No.4, pp. 20-26, 2009.
2. [2] R. Bybee, “What is STEM education?,” Science, Vol.329, No.5995, p. 996, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
3. [3] Next Generation Science Standards Lead States (NGSS Lead States), “Next generation science standards: for states, by states,” The National Academies Press, 2013.
4. [4] G. Yakman, “STEAM education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education,” The Pupils Attitude Toward Technology Conf., 2008.
5. [5] J. Maeda, “STEM+Art=STEAM,” The Transdisciplinary STEAM+ J., Vol.1, No.1, Article No.34, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.201301.34
6. [6] Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “Course of study for elementary school,” Toyokan Publishing Co., Ltd., 2018 (in Japanese).
7. [7] T. Ishibashi, S. Kaizawa, Y. Ishikawa, and J. Moriyama, “Research of description contents regarding electricity in elementary school and junior high school textbooks based on the new course of study,” IEEJ Trans. on Fundamentals and Materials, Vol.142, No.7, pp. 291-299, 2022 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.142.291
8. [8] Y. Ohnishi, K. Honda, R. Nishioka, S. Mori, and K. Kawada, “Robotics programming learning for elementary and junior high school students,” J. Robot. Mechatron.,Vol.29, No.6, pp. 992-998, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0992
9. [9] K. Kawada, K. Okamoto, T. Tamai, and Y. Ohnishi, “A study on developmentally appropriate programming education learning materials for lower-elementary school students,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 441-451, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0441
10. [10] K. Kimura and T. Morikawa, “Measuring the degree of understanding of ‘electric cells in parallel’ by use of mathematical equivalence relations between pictures,” Japan Society for Science Education, Vol.27, No.5, pp. 311-317, 2003 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.14935/jssej.27.311
11. [11] T. Ishibashi and J. Moriyama, “Development and practice of learning materials for an engineering oriented circuit design workshop for elementary school student,” Electronics and Communications in Japan, Vol.107, No.1, Article No.e12436, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.12436