JRM Vol.35 No.6 pp. 1551-1561
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2023.p1551


Reliability Improvement of a Crawler-Type Ceiling Mobile Robot in Starting, Accelerating, and Traveling Phase at High Speed

Rei Ezaka, Takehito Yoshida ORCID Icon, Yudai Yamada ORCID Icon, Shin’ichi Warisawa, and Rui Fukui ORCID Icon

The University of Tokyo
5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0882, Japan

March 30, 2023
July 11, 2023
December 20, 2023
ceiling mobile robot, mechanical hanging mechanism, crawler, optical motion capture

The ceiling serves as an ideal location for robots to handle transportation tasks, as it ensures minimal interference between automated guided vehicles (AGV) and human activities. A previous study developed a ceiling mobile robot called HanGrawler 2. It can travel at a high speed of 1.0 m/s to compete with ground vehicles. However, it occasionally fails during high-speed travel. This study aims to improve the reliability of starting, accelerating, and traveling at high speed. Optical motion capture is used to observe the crawler behavior of HanGrawler 2. The observation of the crawler behavior revealed that the crawler moves on an inflated trajectory during the high-speed movement. In addition, the experimental results show that the collision is not caused by the inflation, but by the push-in timing. The reliability of high-speed travel was improved by installing an encoder and optimizing the push-in timing in accordance with speed fluctuations.

Reliable high-speed travel of HanGrawler

Reliable high-speed travel of HanGrawler

Cite this article as:
R. Ezaka, T. Yoshida, Y. Yamada, S. Warisawa, and R. Fukui, “Reliability Improvement of a Crawler-Type Ceiling Mobile Robot in Starting, Accelerating, and Traveling Phase at High Speed,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35 No.6, pp. 1551-1561, 2023.
Data files:
  1. [1] I. F. A. Vis., “Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol.170, No.3, pp. 677-709, 2006.
  2. [2] E. A. Oyekanlu et al., “A review of recent advances in automated guided vehicle technologies: Integration challenges and research areas for 5G-based smart manufacturing applications,” IEEE Access, Vol.8, pp. 202312-202353, 2020.
  3. [3] Q. Hong et al., “Wall climbing robot enabled by a novel and robust vibration suction technology,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. Automat. Logist., pp. 331-336, 2009.
  4. [4] Y. K. Song et al., “Development of wall climbing robotic system for inspection purpose,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Robot., pp. 1990-1995, 2008.
  5. [5] J. Zhow et al., “Design and Analysis of a Novel Rolling Sealed Negative Pressure Adsorption Wall-Climbing Robot,” Proc. of RobCE 2022, pp. 84-90, 2022.
  6. [6] J. Xiao et al., “Rise-rover: A wall-climbing robot with high reliability and load-carrying capacity,” Proc. of IEEE ROBIO, pp. 2072-2077, 2015.
  7. [7] P. Kriengkomol et al., “New tripod walking method for legged inspection robot,” Proc. of IEEE ICMA, pp. 1078-1083, 2016.
  8. [8] G. Lee et al., “Combot: Compliant climbing robotic platform with transitioning capability and payload capacity,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. Robot., pp. 2732-2742, 2012.
  9. [9] Y. Wang et al., “Self-compliant track-type wall-climbing robot for variable curvature facade,” IEEE Access, Vol.10, pp. 51951-51963, 2021.
  10. [10] F. Howlader et al., “Novel adhesion mechanism and design parameters for concrete wall-climbing robot,” Proc. of SAI IntelliSys, pp. 267-273, 2015.
  11. [11] W. Lee et al., “Contacting Surface-Transfer Control for Reconfigurable Wall-Climbing Robot Gunryu III,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.25, No.3, pp. 439-448, 2013.
  12. [12] G. D. Wile et al., “Screenbot: Walking inverted using distributed inward gripping,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Robot., pp. 1513-1518, 2008.
  13. [13] J. Xu et al., “A multi-mode biomimetic wall-climbing robot,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Sci. Eng., pp. 514-519, 2018.
  14. [14] T. Satooka et al., “Development of mobile module in reconfigurable intelligent space,” Proc. of SICE SI Division Conf., 2019.
  15. [15] R. Fukui et al., “Experimental comparison of two ceiling hanging mobile robots through real prototypes development,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.26, No.1, pp. 40-50, 2014.
  16. [16] S. Sano et al., “Image Mosaicking and Localization Using a Camera Mounted on a Hanging-Type Wall Climbing Robot,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.6, pp. 1373-1383, 2021.
  17. [17] L. Wang et al., “Large-payload climbing in complex vertical environments using thermoplastic adhesive bonds,” IEEE Trans. Robot., Vol.29, No.4, pp. 863-874, 2013.
  18. [18] M. P. Murphy et al., “Waalbot II: Adhesion recovery and improved performance of a climbing robot using fibrillar adhesives,” Int. J. Robot. Res., Vol.30, No.1, pp. 118-133, 2011.
  19. [19] H. H. Hariri et al., “ORION-II: A miniature climbing robot with bilayer compliant tape for autonomous intelligent surveillance and reconnaissance,” Proc. of IEEE ICARCV, pp. 1621-1626, 2018.
  20. [20] R. Chen et al., “Design of a double-tracked wall climbing robot based on electrostatic adhesion mechanism,” Proc. of IEEE ARSO, pp. 212-217, 2013.
  21. [21] R. Fukui et al., “HanGrawler: Large-payload and high-speed ceiling mobile robot using crawler,” IEEE Trans. Robot., Vol.36, No.4, pp. 1053-1066, 2020.
  22. [22] T. Yoshida et al., “HanGrawler 2: Super-high-speed and large-payload ceiling mobile robot using crawler,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Robot., pp. 2468-2474, 2021.
  23. [23] K. Fujita et al., “Vibration Analysis of the Shoes Atached to a Crawler Vehicle in Driving,” Proc. of the JSME Annual Meeting, pp. 519-520, 2000.
  24. [24] Z. Yaojuan et al., “Research on the Simulation of the Driving System of Crawler Bulldozer,” Proc. of TMEE, pp. 703-706, 2011.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Feb. 19, 2024