single-rb.php

JRM Vol.35 No.4 pp. 948-956
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2023.p0948
(2023)

Paper:

Exploration of a Simple Navigation Method for Swarm Robots Pioneered by Heterogeneity

Yuichiro Sueoka ORCID Icon, Mitsuki Okada, Yusuke Tsunoda ORCID Icon, Yasuhiro Sugimoto ORCID Icon, and Koichi Osuka ORCID Icon

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University
2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received:
February 20, 2023
Accepted:
May 18, 2023
Published:
August 20, 2023
Keywords:
group navigation with heterogeneity, swarm robots, simple navigation
Abstract

In recent years, research has been conducted on swarm robot systems in which multiple autonomous mobile robots cooperate to perform tasks. Swarm robot systems are expected to perform high functionality as a group by cooperating with each other, in spite of the limited capabilities of the individual robots. This paper explores a method of simplifying swarm robot controllers as much as possible for swarm robot navigation. If we can achieve autonomous navigation of swarm robots to a target area with minimal resource consumption, they only need to implement the task execution function in that area. This leads to lower costs for swarm robot design and more efficient system architecture design. To address the above aims, this study focuses on heterogeneity. Specifically, we introduce a navigator robot that indirectly guides swarm robots named the worker robots. Heterogeneity in this paper refers to the worker robots and the navigator robots. We design the interaction between the navigator robot and the worker robots to provide a system that guides the worker robots to the destination.

Heterogeneity-based swarm robot navigation

Heterogeneity-based swarm robot navigation

Cite this article as:
Y. Sueoka, M. Okada, Y. Tsunoda, Y. Sugimoto, and K. Osuka, “Exploration of a Simple Navigation Method for Swarm Robots Pioneered by Heterogeneity,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35 No.4, pp. 948-956, 2023.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] M. Brambilla, E. Ferrante, M. Birattari, and M. Dorigo, “Swarm robotics: A review from the swarm engineering perspective,” Swarm Intelligence, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 1-41, 2013. https://doi.org//10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2
  2. [2] T. Arai, E. Pagello, and L. E. Parker, “Editorial: Advances in multi-robot systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., Vol.18, No.5, pp. 655-661, 2002.
  3. [3] L. Bayindir, “A review of swarm robotics tasks,” Neurocomputing, Vol.172, pp. 292-321, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.116
  4. [4] E. Sahin, “Swarm Robotics: From Sources of Inspiration to Domains of Application,” Swarm Robotics, Vol.3342, pp. 10-20, 2005. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-540-30552-1_2
  5. [5] E. Tuci, M. H. M. Alkilabi, and O. Akanyeti, “Cooperative Object Transport in Multi-Robot Systems: A Review of the State-of-the-Art,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol.5, Article No.59, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00059
  6. [6] Z. Wang and M. Schwager, “Kinematic Multi-Robot Manipulation with no Communication Using Force Feedback,” 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 427-432, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487163
  7. [7] J. Werfel, K. Petersen, and R. Nagpal, “Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team,” Science, Vol.343, No.6172, pp. 754-758, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245842
  8. [8] K. Sakurama, S. Azuma, and T. Sugie, “Multiagent Coordination Via Distributed Pattern Matching,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol.64, No.8, pp. 3210-3225, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2018.2885491
  9. [9] K. Sakurama, “Unified Formulation of Multiagent Coordination With Relative Measurements,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol.66, No.9, pp. 4101-4116, 2021. https://doi.org//10.1109/TAC.2020.3030761
  10. [10] M. Rubenstein, A. Cornejo, and R. Nagpal, “Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm,” Science, Vol.345, No.6198, pp. 795-799, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254295
  11. [11] K. Nagatani et al., “Innovative technologies for infrastructure construction and maintenance through collaborative robots based on an open design approach,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.35, No.11, pp. 715-722, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.1929471
  12. [12] D. Sakai, H. Fukushima, and F. Matsuno, “Leader-Follower Navigation in Obstacle Environments While Preserving Connectivity Without Data Transmission,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, Vol.26, No.4, pp. 1233-1248, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2017.2705121
  13. [13] D. Panagou and V. Kumar, “Cooperative visibility maintenance for leader-follower formations in obstacle environments,” IEEE Trans. Robot., Vol.30, No.4, pp. 831-844, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2014.2304774
  14. [14] A. Cezayirli and F. Kerestecioglu, “Navigation of non-communicating autonomous mobile robots with guaranteed connectivity,” Robotica, Vol.31, No.5, pp. 767-776, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574713000027
  15. [15] R. Vaughan, N. Sumpter, A. Frost, and S. Cameron, “Robot sheepdog project achieves automatic flock control,” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, 1998. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3119.003.0074
  16. [16] D. Strömbom, R. P. Mann, A. M. Wilson, S. Hailes, A. J. Morton, D. J. Sumpter, and A. J. King, “Solving the shepherding problem: Heuristics for herding autonomous interacting agents,” J. of the Royal Society Interface, Vol.11, No.100, Article No.20140719, 2014. https://doi.org//10.1098/rsif.2014.0719
  17. [17] W. Lee and D. Kim, “Autonomous shepherding behaviors of multiple target steering robots,” Sensors, Vol.17, No.12, Article No.2729, 2017. https://doi.org//10.3390/s17122729
  18. [18] Y. Tsunoda, Y. Sueoka, and K. Osuka, “On statistical analysis for shepherd guidance system,” 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pp. 1246-1251, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324588
  19. [19] Y. Sueoka, T. Kita, M. Ishikawa, and K. Osuka, “Analysis of Sheepdog-Type Robot Navigation for Goal-Lost-Situation,” Robotics, Vol.7, No.2, Article No.21, 2018. https://doi.org//10.3390/robotics7020021
  20. [20] Y. Tsunoda, Y. Sueoka, Y. Sato, and K. Osuka, “Analysis of local-camera-based shepherding navigation,” Advanced Robotics, Vol.32, No.23, pp. 1217-1228, 2018. https://doi.org//10.1080/01691864.2018.1539410
  21. [21] Y. Tsunoda, Y. Sueoka, T. Wada, and K. Osuka, “Sheepdog-type robot navigation: Experimental verification based on a linear model,” 2020 IEEE/SICE Int. Symposium on System Integration (SII), pp. 1144-1149, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/SII46433.2020.9026218
  22. [22] M. Dorigo et al., “Swarmanoid: A novel concept for the study of heterogeneous robotic swarm,” IEEE Robot Autom. Mag., Vol.20, No.4, pp. 60-71, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2013.2252996
  23. [23] R. Maeda, T. Endo, and F. Matsuno, “Decentralized Navigation for Heterogeneous Swarm Robots With Limited Field of View,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 904-911, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2654549
  24. [24] L. Sabattini, C. Secchi, and N. Chopra, “Decentralized Estimation and Control for Preserving the Strong Connectivity of Directed Graphs,” IEEE Trans. Cybern., Vol.45, No.10, pp. 2273-2286, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2369572

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2024