JRM Vol.35 No.4 pp. 918-921
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2023.p0918


Group Chase and Escape with Chemotaxis

Chikoo Oosawa ORCID Icon

Graduate School of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology
680-4 Kawazu, Iizuka, Fukuoka 820-8502, Japan

January 18, 2023
April 8, 2023
August 20, 2023
group chase and escape, chemotaxis, Wolfpack, micromachines

A model is proposed for group chase and escape using chemotactic movements only. In the proposed model, the movement depends on the concentration of the chemical substances released by each agent. Chemotaxis-based interactions propagate slower and later, and exist locally between agents, making groups chase and escape under more uncertain circumstances than in cases where agent distance measurements use electromagnetic waves, such as visible light. Numerical results with the model demonstrate that maintaining a longer distance between the chasers and targets is a better strategy for each group.

Chemotactic agents reproduce a swarm intelligence

Chemotactic agents reproduce a swarm intelligence

Cite this article as:
C. Oosawa, “Group Chase and Escape with Chemotaxis,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.35 No.4, pp. 918-921, 2023.
Data files:
  1. [1] C. W. Reynolds, “Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Vol.21, No.4, pp. 25-34, 1987.
  2. [2] T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, “Novel Type of Phase Transition in a System of Self-Driven Particles,” Physical Review Letters, Vol.75, No.6, pp. 1226-1229, 1995.
  3. [3] T. Kida, Y. Sueoka, H. Shigeyoshi, Y. Tsunoda, Y. Sugimoto, and K. Osuka, “Verification of Acoustic-Wave-Oriented Simple State Estimation and Application to Swarm Navigation,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.1, pp. 119-128, 2021.
  4. [4] D. Kurabayashi, T. Choh, J. Cheng, and T. Funato, “Adaptive Formation Transition of a Swarm of Mobile Robots Based on Phase Gradient,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.22, No.4, pp. 467-474, 2010.
  5. [5] M. Naruoka, Y. Goto, H. Weimerskirch, T. Mukai, T. Sakamoto, K. Sakamoto, and K. Sato, “Application of Inertial and GNSS Integrated Navigation to Seabird Biologging,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.3, pp. 526-536, 2021.
  6. [6] B. L. Bassler and R. Losick, “Bacterially speaking,” Cell, Vol.125, pp. 237-246, 2006.
  7. [7] S. Mukherjee and B. L. Bassler, “Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, Vol.17, pp. 371-382, 2019.
  8. [8] L. Tweedy, O. Susanto, and R. H. Insall, “Self-generated chemotactic gradients-cells steering themselves,” Current Opinion Cell Biology, Vol.42, pp. 46-51, 2016.
  9. [9] B. Petri and M.-J. Sanz, “Neutrophil chemotaxis,” Cell Tissue Research, Vol.371, pp. 425-436, 2018.
  10. [10] A. Kimura and T. Ohira, “Group chase and escape,” New J. of Physics, Vol.12, Article No.053013, 2010.
  11. [11] A. Kimura and T. Ohira, “Group Chase and Escape: Fusion of Pursuits-Escapes and Collective Motions (Theoretical Biology),” Springer, 2019.
  12. [12] C. Oosawa, “A model of camphor-type self-driven particle,” Proc. of the 26th Symposium on Traffic Flow and Self-driven Particles, pp. 55-58, 2020.
  13. [13] C. Burstedde, K. Klauck, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz, “Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a 2-dimensional cellular automaton,” Physica A, Vol.295, pp. 507-525, 2001.
  14. [14] A. Kirchner, K. Nishinari, and A. Schadschneider, “Friction effects and clogging in a cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical Review E, Vol.67, Article No.056122, 2003.
  15. [15] C. Muro, R. Escobedo, L. Spector, and R. P. Coppinger, “Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations,” Behavioural Processes, Vol.88, pp. 192-197, 2011.
  16. [16] J. E. Berlman and J. R. Kirby, “Deciphering the hunting strategy of a bacterial wolfpack,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, Vol.33, pp. 942-957, 2009.
  17. [17] F. Soto, J. Wang, R. Ahmed, and U. Demirci, “Medical Micro/Nanorobots in Precision Medicine,” Advanced Science, Vol.7, Article No.2002203, 2020.
  18. [18] K. Nakamura and T. J. Kobayashi, “A connection between bacterial chemotactic network and optimal filtering,” Physical Review Letters, Vol.126, Article No.128102, 2021.
  19. [19] K. Nakamura and T. J. Kobayashi, “Optimal sensing control of run-and-tumble chemotaxis,” Physical Review Research, Vol.4, Article No.013120, 2022.
  20. [20] S. Murata, A. Konagaya, S. Kobayashi, H. Saito, and M. Hagiya, “Molecular Robotics: A New Paradigm for Artifacts,” New Generation Computing, Vol.31, pp. 27-45, 2013.
  21. [21] M. Hagiya, A. Konagaya, S. Kobayashi, H. Saito, and S. Murata, “Molecular Robots with Sensors and Intelligence,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Vol.47, No.6, pp. 1681-1690, 2014.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 12, 2024