single-rb.php

JRM Vol.33 No.4 pp. 784-803
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2021.p0784
(2021)

Paper:

Use of Robotic Pet in a Distributed Layout Elderly Housing with Services: A Case Study on Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment

Yoko Hori*1, Ken Kato*2, Mia Kobayashi*3, Yuriko Inoue*4, Kecheng Lai*5, Akitaka Sugishita*6, Yoshihiro Okamoto*7, Satoko Kamiya*8, and Takanori Shibata*9,*10,*11

*1Happy-Net Association
  2-14-1 Nagono, Nishi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 451-0042, Japan

*2Aichi Shukutoku University
  2-9 Katahira, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1197, Japan

*3Wayo Women’s University
  1-12-11 Kudankita, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0073, Japan

*4International University of Health and Welfare
  4-1-26 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan

*5Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
  1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan

*6Nagoya University Hospital
  65 Tsurumai, Shouwa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8560, Japan

*7School of Policy Studies, Chukyo University
101-2 Yagoto-honmachi, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8666, Japan

*8Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences
4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 460-0001, Japan

*9National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan

*10Tokyo Institute of Technology
4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan

*11AgeLab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

Received:
February 20, 2021
Accepted:
April 22, 2021
Published:
August 20, 2021
Keywords:
robotic pet, PARO, BPSD, CDBD-13, KJ method
Abstract
Use of Robotic Pet in a Distributed Layout Elderly Housing with Services: A Case Study on Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment

Sunbathing of PARO by subject No.8

In recent years, robotic pets have been used by many countries worldwide as a method for treating behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). The seal robot PARO was loaned intermittently to a distributed layout elderly housing with services over a seven-month period, during which it was observed that three residents with cognitive dysfunctions showed improvements in their BPSD and the nursing care load of the staff was reduced during the periods when PARO was present. The objective of this study is to investigate, through a case study, the effects of intermittent interaction with PARO on those with cognitive dysfunctions and the staff workers. The short version of the Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD-13) was used as the medical outcome index, and the KJ method was used to analyze the qualitative data, such as staff reports and interviews. The results show that the DBD-13 total scores reduced during the periods when PARO was present and increased during the periods when PARO was absent. The KJ method yielded similar findings. The use of DBD-13 and the KJ method complemented the results of each other and increased the persuasive power of the findings. By using the KJ method, it was further determined that the workload of the staff was reduced, allowing them to recuperate, which reconfirmed the value of PARO. Further case studies will be undertaken in the future with the aim of constructing a methodology for implementing case studies.

Cite this article as:
Yoko Hori, Ken Kato, Mia Kobayashi, Yuriko Inoue, Kecheng Lai, Akitaka Sugishita, Yoshihiro Okamoto, Satoko Kamiya, and Takanori Shibata, “Use of Robotic Pet in a Distributed Layout Elderly Housing with Services: A Case Study on Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.33, No.4, pp. 784-803, 2021.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] R. Yamazaki, H. Kase, S. Nishio et al., “Anxiety Reduction Through Close Communication with Robotic Media in Dementia Patients and Healthy Older Adults,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.32, No.1, pp. 32-42, 2020.
  2. [2] K. Nakagawa, R. Matsumura, and M. Shiomi, “Effect of Robot’s Play-Biting in Non-Verbal Communication,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.32, No.1, pp. 86-96, 2020.
  3. [3] R. Abbott, N. Orr, P. McGill et al., “How do “robopets” impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence,” Int. J. of Older People Nursing, Vol.14, No.3, pp. 1-23, 2019.
  4. [4] S. Petersen, S. Houston, H. Qin et al., “The Utilization of Robotic Pets in Dementia Care,” J. of Alzheimer’s Disease, Vol.55, No.2, pp. 569-574, 2017.
  5. [5] M. Leng, P. Liu, P. Zhang et al., “Pet robot intervention for people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Psychiatry Research, Vol.271, pp. 516-525, 2019.
  6. [6] L. Hung, C. Liu, E. Woldum et al., “The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings:a scoping review,” BMC Geriatrics, Vol.19, No.1, p. 232, 2019.
  7. [7] H. L. Bradwell, K. J. Edwards, R. Winnington et al., “Companion robots for older people: Importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England,” BMJ Open, Vol.9, No.9, 2019.
  8. [8] E. Fineout-Overholt, B. M. Melnyk, and A. Schultz, “Transforming health care from the inside out:advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century,” J. of Professional Nursing, Vol.21, No.6, pp. 335-344, 2019.
  9. [9] K. Kawamura, S. Nishio, and S. Sato, “Can We Talk through a Robot As if Face-to-Face? Long-Term Fieldwork Using Teleoperated Robot for Seniors with Alzheimer’s Disease,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.7, 1066, 2016.
  10. [10] D. B. Brecher, “Use of a robotic cat to treat terminal restlessness: a case study,” J. Palliat. Med., Vol.23, No.3, pp. 432-434, 2020.
  11. [11] J. Pike, R. Picking, and S. Cunningham, “Robot companion cats for people living with dementia: a case study on companotics,” AirTech 2018 Conf., Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2018.
  12. [12] M. Sato, Y. Yasuhara et al., “Rehabilitation care with pepper humanoid robot: A qualitative case study of older patients with schizophrenia and/or dementia in Japan,” Enfermería Clínica, Vol.30, pp. 32-36, 2020.
  13. [13] M. Kanamori, M. Suzuki, and M. Tanaka, “Maintenance and Improvement of Quality of Life among Elderly Patients Using a Pet-Type Robot,” The Japan Geriatrics Society, Vol.39, No.2, pp. 214-218, 2002.
  14. [14] S. Baisch et al., “Emotional robots in a nursing context: Empirical analysis of the present use and the effects of Paro and Pleo,” Z. Gerontol. Geriatr., Vol.51, No.1, pp. 16-24, 2017.
  15. [15] E. Wagemaker, T. J. Dekkers et al., “Advances in mental health care: five N=1 studies on the effects of the robot seal paro in adults with severe intellectual disabilities,” J. of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol.10, No.4, pp. 309-320, 2017.
  16. [16] T. Igaki, “Present condition of and future prospects for single-case designs” Japanese J. of Behavior Analysis, Vol.29, pp. 174-187, 2015 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] Proc. of 1st-11th Int. Symp. on Robot Therapy with Seal Robot, PARO, 2012-2019 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] T. Shibata, “Non-drug therapy with the Seal Robot “PARO” for neurological therapy,” The Latest Medical Care for Dementia: A J. of Current Dementia Care, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 27-31, 2019 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] T. Shibata and J. F. Coughlin, “Trends of Robot Therapy with Neurological Therapeutic Seal Robot PARO,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.26, No.4, pp. 418-425, 2014.
  20. [20] H. L. Bradwell et al., “Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes,” Plos one, Vol.15, No.8, e0237069, 2020.
  21. [21] A. Machida, “Estimation of the reliability and validity of the short version of the 28-item Dementia Behavior Disturbance scale,” J. of the Japan Geriatrics Society, Vol.49, No.4, pp. 463-467, 2012 (in Japanese).
  22. [22] Y. Hori, J. Hosino et al., “Assessment ability improvement training:Let‘s understand the causal relationship,” Nursing Records and Nursing Process, Vol.21, No.5, pp. 87-94, 2011 (in Japanese).
  23. [23] F. Omura and Y. Hori, “Case study on the introduction of PARO for family caregivers responsible for long-distance care and multiple care,” Proc. of 11th Int. Symp. on Robot Therapy with Seal Robot, PARO, 2012-2019 (in Japanese).
  24. [24] A. Sharkey, “Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people,” Ethics and Information Technology, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 63-75, 2014.
  25. [25] L. M. Eckerd, J. E. Barnett, and L. Jett-Dias, “Grief following pet and human loss: Closeness is key,” Death Studies, Vol.40, No.5, pp. 275-283, 2016.
  26. [26] N. P. Field, L. Orsini, R. Gavish et al., “Role of attachment in response to pet loss,” Death Studies, Vol.33, No.4, pp. 334-355, 2009.
  27. [27] A. Durkin, “Loss of a companion animal: understanding and helping the bereaved,” J. of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol.47, No.7, pp. 26-31, 2009.
  28. [28] Y. Kimura, “Grief Reaction and Care Associated with Pet Loss in Japan,” Japanese J. of psychosomatic Medecine, Vol.49, No.5, pp. 357-362, 2009.
  29. [29] J. Kawakita, “Continuation of Idea Method: Development and application of the KJ method,” Chuokoron-Shinsya, Inc., 1970 (in Japanese).
  30. [30] H. Tanaka, “KJ Method Entry: Before using the KJ method as a qualitative data analysis method,” Methods for Better Foreign Language Teaching and Research, pp. 17-29, 2010 (in Japanese).
  31. [31] H. Kiyoshi, “Write a case study paper,” J. of Information Systems, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 1-2, 2014 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 24, 2021