JRM Vol.29 No.6 pp. 1014-1024
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2017.p1014


Development of Teaching Material for Robot Mechanisms Applying Projection Mapping Technology

Yasuhiro Kushihashi* and Sho Mizumura**

*Nippon Institute of Technology
4-1 Gakuendai, Miyashiro-machi, Minamisaitama-gun, Saitama 345-8501, Japan

**Graduate School, Nippon Institute of Technology
4-1 Gakuendai, Miyashiro-machi, Minamisaitama-gun Saitama 345-8501, Japan

May 30, 2017
October 29, 2017
December 20, 2017
gear drive mechanism, module, four-bar link mechanism, two-joint serial link mechanism, force vector
Development of Teaching Material for Robot Mechanisms Applying Projection Mapping Technology

Projection example of serial link mechanism

Teaching materials that can interactively display the vectors of forces and velocities as well as the trajectories and graphs of remarkable points, which are invisible in actual mechanical movements, should be capable of effectively supporting the learning of complex robot mechanics. In this study, we aim to acquire knowledge about the design principles for building teaching materials for robot mechanics, applying projection mapping technology (PM). We have first studied the components required in teaching material systems on the following candidate mechanisms: transmission mechanism with spur gears and quadric crank chain as two basic mechanisms and serial two-link mechanism as a representative subject of robot mechanisms. We have constructed systems and conducted experiments to evaluate their performance. In this study, we propose a fundamental method for designing teaching materials on mechanisms applying PM, establish the effectiveness of the proposed method, and indicate problems with the current systems.

  1. [1] M. Ishita, “Projection Mapping as a Means of Creative Visual Expression and Its Future Prospects,” Japanese J. of Optics, Vol.43, No.10, pp. 450-456, 2014 (in Jananese).
  2. [2] H. Chen, K. Feng, C. Mo, S. Cheng, Z. Guo, and Y. Huang, “Application of Augmented Reality in Engineering Graphics Education,” Proc. IEEE 2011 Int. Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education (ITME), pp. 362-365, 2011.
  3. [3] M. J. G. Figueiredo, P. J. S. Cardoso, C. D. F. Goncalves, and J. M. F. Rodrigues, “Augmented Reality and Holograms for the Visualization of Mechanical Engineering parts,” Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Information Visualisation, pp. 368-373, 2014.
  4. [4] K. Watanuki, K. Kaede, and M. Muto, “Development of Education Support System for Mechatronics Using Augmented Reality Technology,” J.of JSEE, Vol.60, No.6, pp. 99-105, 2012 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] J. R. L. Benito, E. A. Gonzalez, M. Anastassova, and F. Souvestre, “Engaging Computer Engineering Students with an Augmented Reality Software for Laboratory Exercises,” FIE, IEEE, Madrid, 2014.
  6. [6] D. M. Popovici and L. D. Serbanati, “Using mixed VR/AR technologies in education,” Proc. of Int. Multi-Conf. in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI’06), p. 14, 2006.
  7. [7] Z. Rongting, S. Yiran, H. Tongliang, and F. Admi, “Applying Augmented Reality Technology to E-Learning: Science Educational AR Products as an Example,” IEEE ICEBE 2016, pp. 129-133, 2016.
  8. [8] K. Harada, N. Suzuki, T. Tsuji, T. Matsuzaki, and D. Sakai, “Educational tools using projection mapping,” Japanese J. Applied Physics Education, Vol.40, No.1, pp. 49-53, 2016 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] H. Okumura, “A Study on Tree-dimensional Models for Education Using Augmented Reality (AR) Technology,” Bull. Shikoku Univ., Vol.A, No.44, pp. 19-27, 2015 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] E. Miyazaki, M. Aritomo, and H. Watanabe, “Prototype of Junior High School Technology Teaching Materials using Projection Mapping,” Mem. Fac. Educ., Kagawa Uinv., Vol.II, No.66, pp. 25-32, 2016 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] C. Sahin. D. Nguyen, S. Begashaw, B. Katz, J. Chacko, L. Henderson, J. Stanford, and K. R. Dandekar, “Wireless communications engineering education via Augmented Reality,” IEEE FIE 2016, pp. 1-7, 2016.
  12. [12] C. L. Ng, T. C. Ng, T. A. N. Nguyen, G. Yang, and W. Chen, “Intuitive Robot Tool Path Teaching Using Laser and Camera in Augmented Reality Environment,” Proc. IEEE 11th Int. Conf. Control, Automation Robotics and Vision, pp. 114-119, 2010.
  13. [13] T. Kaneda, N. Hamada, and Y. Mitsukura, “Automatic Alignment Method for Projection Mapping on Planes with Depth,” IEEE CSPA 2016, pp. 111-114, 2016.
  14. [14] F. Manus, J. Rubel, C. Wagner, F. Bingel, and A. Hinkenjann, “Augmenting Magnetic Field Lines for School Experiments,” Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2011, pp. 263-264, 2011.
  15. [15] B. Conradi, V. Lerch, M. Hommer, R. Kowalski, I. Vletsou, and H. Hussmann, “Flow of electrons:An augmented workspace for learning physical computing experientially,” ITS ’11 Proc. of the ACM Int. Conf. Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 182-191, 2011.
  16. [16] Y. Akiyama and H. Miyashita, “Electronic Modeling Experience Support System Using Projection Mapping,” TVRSJ, Vol.20, No.2, 2015, pp. 83-86, 2015 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] S. Tsuchida, N. Yumoto, and S. Matsuura, “Development of Augmented Reality Teaching Materials with Projection Mapping on Real Experimental Settings,” C. Stephanidis (Ed.), HCI Int. 2014 – Posters’ Extended Abstracts, HCI 2014, Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol.435, pp. 177-182, 2014.
  18. [18] Y. Kamada, T. Yamasaki, Y. Tsuno, N. Tsuchimura, and H. Miwa, “Traffic Control Method for Interactive Projection Mapping Control System,” IEEE Int. Conf. Intelligent Networking anda Collaborative Systems, pp. 143-149, 2016.
  19. [19] Y. Fujimoto, G. Yamamoto, T. Taketomi, J. Miyazaki, and H. Kato, “Relation between Display in Features of Augmented Reality and User’s Memorization,” Trans. Virtual Reality Soc. Japan, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 81-91, 2013 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jan. 23, 2018