Top > JRM > Test Methods for the Evaluation of Manufacturing Mobile Manipu ...

single-rb.php

JRM Vol.28 No.2 pp. 199-214
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2016.p0199
(2016)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 1,678

Test Methods for the Evaluation of Manufacturing Mobile Manipulator Safety

Jeremy A. Marvel* and Roger Bostelman*,**

*National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8230, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

**IEM, Le2i, Université de Bourgogne
BP 47870, 21078 Dijon, France

Received:
June 9, 2015
Accepted:
January 18, 2016
Published:
April 20, 2016
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
mobile manipulators, AGV safety, robot safety
Abstract
This paper presents a test methodology for evaluating the safety of mobile manipulators (robot arms mounted on mobile bases). This methodology addresses the safety concerns relevant to modern, agile, manufacturing practices in which mobile manipulators will play a significant role. We consider 1) the unique capabilities and anticipated uses of mobile manipulators and 2) the potential exemptions and special cases in which their behavior may be unpredictable or otherwise contrary to the safety requirements. Finally, we define metrics for assessing compliance with functional safety requirements and anticipated performance.
Arm-on-AGV safety test methods

Arm-on-AGV safety test methods

Cite this article as:
J. Marvel and R. Bostelman, “Test Methods for the Evaluation of Manufacturing Mobile Manipulator Safety,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.28 No.2, pp. 199-214, 2016.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] D. Grubaugh, “Worker killed at Granite City plant,” The Telegraph, 2013.
  2. [2] Int. Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 13854, Safety of machinery – Minimum gaps to avoid crushing of parts of the human body, 1996.
  3. [3] ISO, ISO 13855, Safety of machinery – Positioning of safeguards with respect to the approach speeds of parts of the human body, 2010.
  4. [4] ISO, ISO 10218-1:2011, Robots and robotic devices – Safety requirements – Part 1: Robots, 2011.
  5. [5] ISO, ISO 10218-2:2011, Robots and robotic devices – Safety requirements – Part 2: Industrial robot systems and integration, 2011.
  6. [6] American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Robotics Industries Association (RIA), ANSI/RIA R15.06, Industrial robots and robot systems – Safety requirements, 2012.
  7. [7] ISO, ISO/PDTS 15066, Robots and robotic devices – Industrial safety requirements – Collaborative industrial robots, unpublished.
  8. [8] ANSI/Industrial Truck Standards Development Foundation (ITSDF), ANSI/ITSDF B56.5, Safety standard for driverless, automatic guided industrial vehicles and automated functions of manned industrial vehicles, 2012.
  9. [9] M. Takahashi, T. Moriguchi, S. Tanaka, H. Namikawa, H. Shitamoto, T. Nakano. Y. Minato, T. Ihama, and T. Murayama, “Development of a Mobile Robot for Transport Application in Hospital,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.24, No.6, 2012.
  10. [10] Y. Kume, Y. Hirata, and K. Kosuge, “Object Handling by Coordinated Multiple Mobile Manipulators Without Force/Torque Sensors,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.20, No.3 pp. 394-402, 2008.
  11. [11] J. Marvel and R. Bostelman. “Towards mobile manipulator safety standards,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Sensors Env., pp. 31-36, 2013.
  12. [12] P. M. Moubarak and P. Ben-Tzvi, “Adaptive manipulation of a hybrid mechanism mobile robot,” Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Rob. Sens. Env., pp. 113-118, 2011.
  13. [13] E. Messina and A. Jacoff, “Performance standards for urban search and rescue robots,” Proc. SPIE, Unmanned Syst. Tech. VIII, Vol.6230, 2006.
  14. [14] T. L. Chen and C. C. Kemp, “Lead me by the hand: Evaluation of a direct physical interface for nursing assistant robots,” Proc. 5th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Rob. Interact, pp. 367-374, 2010.
  15. [15] S. S. Srinivasa et al., “Herb 2.0: Lessons learned from developing a mobile manipulator for the home,” Proc. IEEE, Vol.100, No.8, pp. 2410-2428, 2012.
  16. [16] European Parliament, “Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC,” Official J. of the European Union, L 157, pp. 24-86, 2006.
  17. [17] British Standards Institution, BS EN 1525 Safety of industrial trucks – Driverless trucks and their systems, 1998.
  18. [18] R. Bostelman, R. Norcross, J. Falco, and J. Marvel, “Development of standard test methods for unmanned and manned industrial vehicles used near humans,” Proc. SPIE Defense, Secur., and Sens.: Multisens., Multisource Inf. Fusion: Archit., Algorithms, and Appl., 2013.
  19. [19] J. Rehg, “Introduction to Robotics: A Systems Approach,” Prentice Hall, Inc., 1985.
  20. [20] “BG/BGIA risk assessment recommendations according to machinery directive: Design of workplaces with collaborative robots, U001/2009e October 2009 edition,” BGIA, 2011.
  21. [21] J. Fryman and B. Matthias, “Safety of Industrial Robots: From Conventional to Collaborative Applications,” Proc. 7th. Int. Conf. Safety Indust. Autom. Syst., pp. 198-203, 2012.
  22. [22] ISO, ISO 9283, Manipulating industrial robots – Performance criteria and related test methods, 1998.
  23. [23] J. Falco, J. Marvel, and R. Norcross, “Collaborative robotics: Measuring blunt force impacts on humans,” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Safety Ind. Autom. Sys., pp. 186-191, 2012.
  24. [24] R. Bostelman and J. Marvel, “Control Fusion for Safe Multi-robot Coordination,” Proc. SPIE.DSS Defense and Security, Baltimore, MD, 2014.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 13, 2024