single-rb.php

JRM Vol.23 No.5 pp. 748-758
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2011.p0748
(2011)

Paper:

A Unified and Integrated Approach to Teaching a Two-Course Sequence in Robotics Engineering

Taskin Padir, Gregory S. Fischer, Sonia Chernova,
and Michael A. Gennert

Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Rd., Worcester, MA 01609, USA

Received:
March 1, 2011
Accepted:
June 11, 2011
Published:
October 20, 2011
Keywords:
robotics engineering education, robotics curriculum, unified robotics, educational robot platform
Abstract
This paper presents the details of the curricular content developed for a two-course robotics sequence within the undergraduate Robotics Engineering program at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The approach focuses on teaching a unified robotics curriculum, incorporating the foundational concepts from computer science, electrical engineering and mechanical engineering, in an integrative manner by emphasizing the whole systemdesign. Outcomes include high student satisfaction, enhanced student learning and a broad engineering education to meet the needs of the growing robotics industry.
Cite this article as:
T. Padir, G. Fischer, S. Chernova, and M. Gennert, “A Unified and Integrated Approach to Teaching a Two-Course Sequence in Robotics Engineering,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23 No.5, pp. 748-758, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] UNESCO Report, “Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development,” 2010.
    ISBN: 978-92-3-104156-3
  2. [2] “IFR World Robotics 2008: 6.5 million robots in operation worldwide,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, Vol.36 Issue 4, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007.
  3. [3] “Service Robotics: A Global Market Report,” Global Industry Analysts, 2010.
  4. [4] “Personal Robotics: Task, Security and Surveillance/Telepresence, Entertainment, Education Robots and Components,” ABI Research, 2010.
  5. [5] “A Roadmap for US Robotics: From Internet to Robotics,” Computing Community Consortium, 2009.
  6. [6] NSF National Science Board, “Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education,” 2007.
  7. [7] Innovate America, “Council on Competitiveness National Innovation Initiative Summit and Report,” 2005.
  8. [8] National Academy of Engineering, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century,” 2005.
  9. [9] D. Q. Nguyen, “The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry Personnel and Engineering Students,” Global J. of Engineering Education, Vol.2, No.1, 1998.
  10. [10] J. A. Piepmeier, B. E. Bishop, and K. A. Knowles “Modern Robotics Engineering Instruction,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Vol.10, No.2, p. 33, 2003.
  11. [11] D. J. Ahlgren, “Meeting Educational Objectives and Outcomes Through Robotics Education,” Proc. of the 5th Biannual World Automation Congress, 2002.
  12. [12] C.,Kitts and N. Quinn , “An interdisciplinary field robotics program for undergraduate computer science and engineering education,” J. Educ. Resour. Comput., June 2004.
  13. [13] M. J. Mataric, “Robotics Education for All Ages,” Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Accessible, Hands-on AI and Robotics Education, 2004.
  14. [14] G. T. McKee, “The Robotics Body of Knowledge,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 18-19, 2007.
  15. [15] M. Mizukawa, “The Activity of Robotics and Mechatronics Division in the JSME,” The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.12, No.2, December, 2001.
  16. [16] T. Padir, M. A. Gennert, G. Fischer, W. R. Michalson, and E. C. Cobb, “Implementation of an Undergraduate Robotics Engineering Curriculum,” ASEE Computers in Education J., Special Issue on Novel Approaches to Robotics Education, Vol.1, No.3, pp. 92-101, 2010.
  17. [17] K. C. Cohen, “The WPI Plan: Promise and Realty,” The J. of General Education, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 105-112, 1977.
  18. [18] G. Fischer, W.R.Michalson, T. Padir, and G. Pollice, “Development of a Laboratory Kit for Robotics Engineering Education,” Proc. AAAI 2010 Spring Symposium on Educational Robotics and Beyond: Design and Evaluation, Mar. 22-24, Palo Alto, CA, 2010.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 18, 2024