Design and Delivery of a Subject in Robotics
School of Engineering, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia
Course design in engineering should be able to address the core competencies that are required by the engineering profession. To implement this concept many courses are structured to include real-situation projects. From the view point of mechatronic engineering education, it is clear that a robotic project will be suitable to integrate the course contents. However, to provide necessary theoretical skills for students to solve real engineering problems, project only is not sufficient in the subject. In this paper the design and delivery of a subject in robotics at the University of Western Sydney (UWS) is presented and discussed. In particular, this paper reviews the concept behind the course contents, assessments and delivery design. The paper has also demonstrated the impact of such course design in student performance and perception using student survey results and final grades in classes.
-  R. Graham and E. Crawley, “Making projects work: a review of transferable best practice approaches to engineering project-based learning in the UK,” Engineering Education, Vol.5, Issue 2, pp. 41-49, 2010.
-  J. Adams, S. Kaczmarczyk, P. Picton, and P. Demian, “Problem solving and creativity in engineering: conclusions of a three year project involving reusable learning objects and robots,” Engineering Education, Vol.5, Issue 2, pp. 4-17, 2010.
-  L. E. Carlson and J. F. Sullivan, “Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program,” Int. J. of Engineering Education, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 20-31, 1999.
-  F. Stern, T. Xing, D. B. Yarbrough, A. Rothmayer, et al., “Handson CFD educational interface for engineering courses and laboratories,” J. of Engineering Education, Vol.95, No.1, pp. 63-83, 2006.
-  D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in engineering: Effects of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention,” Proc. on American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf., Paper 1800, June 2003.
-  N. Dabbagh and D. A. Menasce, “Student perceptions of engineering entrepreneurship: An exploratory study,” J. of Engineering Education, Vol.95, No.2, pp. 153-164, April 2006.
-  A. M. Erkmen, T. Tsubouchi, and R. Murphy, “Mechatronics education,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Vol.8, No.2, June 2001.
-  D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 35-38, 2001.
-  S. Das, S. A. Yost, and M. Krishnan, “A 10-year mechatronics curriculum development initiative: relevance, content, and results – Part I,” IEEE Trans. on Education, Vol.53, No.2, pp. 194-201, 2010.
-  M. Krishnan, S. Das, and S. A. Yost, “A 10-year mechatronics curriculum development initiative: relevance, content, and results – Part II,” IEEE Trans. on Education, Vol.53, No.2, pp. 202-208, 2010.
-  D. C. Rye, M.W. M. G. Dissanayake, and E. M. Nebot, “Design and development of an undergraduate degree in mechatronics,” Proc. of the Workshop on Mechatronics Education, Stanford University, pp. 91-97, July 21-22, 1994.
-  J. A. Gal and G. Fang, “A flexible robotic assembly system in mechatronics education,” The Proc. of theWorld Congress on Manufacturing, Cairns, Australia, pp. 455-463, 15-17 September 1997.
-  D.Wilcher, “Lego Mindstorms Mechatronics,” McGraw Hill, 2004.
-  J. B. Weinberg and X. Yu, “Robotics in Education: low-cost platforms for teaching integrated systems,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, pp. 4-6, June 2003.
-  X. Yu and J. B. Weinberg, “Robotics in Education: new platforms and environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, p. 3, September 2003.
-  A. Baerveldt, T. Salomonsson, and B. Astrand, “Vision-guided mobile robots for design competitions,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, pp. 38-44, June 2003.
-  J. M. Gomez-de-Gabriel, A. Mandow, J. Fernandez-Lozano, and A. J. Garcia-Cerezo, “Using LEOG NXT mobile robots with Lab-VIEWfor undergraduate courses onMechatronics,” IEEE Trans. on Education, Vol.54, No.1, pp 41-47, 2011.
-  A. Behrens, L. Atorf, R. Schwann, B. Neumann, R. Schnitzler, J. Balle, T. Herold, A. Telle, T. G. Noll, K. Hameyer, and T. Aach, “MATLAB meets LEGOMindstorms – a freshman introduction course into practical engineering,” IEEE Trans. on Education, Vol.53, No.2, pp. 306 - 317, 2010.
-  J. M. M. Tur and C. F. Pfeiffer, “Mobile Robot design in education,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, pp. 69-75, March 2006.
-  A. Soto, P. Espinace, and R.Mitnik, “A Mobile Robotics Course for Undergraduate Students in Computer Science,” Proc. of the IEEE Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS) 2006, pp. 187-192, 2006.
-  G. Dudek and M. Jenkin, “Computational Principles of Mobile Robotics,” Cambridge University Press 2000.
-  J. Borenstein, “Navigating mobile robots: systems and techniques,” A. K. Peters Ltd., 1996.
-  W. E. Dixon et al., “Nonlinear control of wheeled mobile robots,” Springer, 2001.
-  H. R. Everett, “Sensors for Mobile Robots – Theory and Application,” A. K. Peters Ltd., 1995.
-  J. L. Jones, A. M. Flynn, and B. A. Seiger, “Mobile Robots – Inspiration to Implementation,” 2nd Edition, A. K. Peters Ltd., 1999.
-  J. C. Latombe, “Robot motion planning,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
-  R. R. Murphy, “Introduction to AI Robotics,” The MIT Press, 2000.
-  R. Siegwart and I. R. Nourbakhsh, “Introduction to autonomous mobile robots,” The MIT Press, 2004.
-  R. Siegwart, I. R. Nourbakhsh, and D. Scaramuzza, “Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots,” 2nd Edition, TheMIT Press, 2011.
-  “ROBOLAB Reference Guide,” Version 1.4, The LEGO Group, 2006.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.
Copyright© 2011 by Fuji Technology Press Ltd. and Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. All right reserved.