single-rb.php

JRM Vol.23 No.1 pp. 75-82
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2011.p0075
(2011)

Paper:

Compensation of Measurement Precision for Three-Dimensional Position Measurement Device Based on Disturbance Observer

Toshiaki Matsumoto and Satoru Takahashi

Department of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering, Kagawa University, 2217-20, Hayashi-Cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan

Received:
February 8, 2010
Accepted:
June 29, 2010
Published:
February 20, 2011
Keywords:
disturbance observer, position measurement, PID control
Abstract

Improvements in measurement precision will constitute a significant issue in designing control systems formeasurement devices. Specifically, positioning precision may be decreased if unpredicted disturbances from the environment are not taken into account. In this paper, we first estimate unknown disturbances based on the disturbance observer, then design control systems which can reduce the effects of such disturbances to propose a control system capable of compensating for any decreases in measurement precision due to such disturbances, and finally demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control system through a series of experiments.

Cite this article as:
Toshiaki Matsumoto and Satoru Takahashi, “Compensation of Measurement Precision for Three-Dimensional Position Measurement Device Based on Disturbance Observer,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23, No.1, pp. 75-82, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] K. Ohnishi, “Robust motion control by disturbance observer,” J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.11, No.4, pp. 486-493, 1993. (in Japanese)
  2. [2] S. Nara and S. Takahashi, “Visual feedback tracking with laser to moving crane hook,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.18, No.6, pp. 795-802, 2006.
  3. [3] T. Shinozaki and T. Murakami, “3D position detection of a moving object in active stereo vision system with multi-dof motion,” IEEJ Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol.125, No.6, pp. 561-567, 2005. (in Japanese)
  4. [4] Y. Hori, Y. Chun, and H. Sawada, “Experimental evaluation of disturbance observer-based vibration suppression and disturbance rejection control in torsional system,” Proc. of 7th Int. Power Electronics & Motion Control Conf. PEMC’96, Vol.1, pp. 120-124, 1996.
  5. [5] K. Ohnishi, M. Shibata, and T. Murakami, “Motion control for advanced mechatronics,” IEEE/ASME Trans. onMechatronics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 56-67, 1996.
  6. [6] I. A. Smadi and Y. Fujimoto, “On nonlinear disturbance observer based tracking control for euler-lagrange systems,” J. of System Design and Dynamics, Vol.3, Issue 3, pp. 330-343, 2009.
  7. [7] U. Tumerdem, T. Shimono, and K. Ohnishi, “Asymmetric multilateral teleoperation through scaled consensus reaching on graphs,” IEEJ Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol.129, No.10, pp. 972-980, 2009.
  8. [8] K. Matsushita and T. Murakami, “Nonholonomic equivalent disturbance based backward motion control of tractor-trailer with virtual steering,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.55, No.1, pp. 280-287, 2008.
  9. [9] T. Shibata and T. Murakami, “Null space motion control by PID control considering passivity in redundant manipulator,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 261-270, 2008.
  10. [10] K. Natori, R. Oboe, and K. Ohnishi, “Stability analysis and practical design procedure of time delayed control systems with communication disturbance observer,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.4, No.3, pp. 185-197, 2008.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 11, 2021