single-rb.php

JRM Vol.19 No.6 pp. 691-697
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2007.p0691
(2007)

Paper:

Robot Therapy for Prevention of Dementia at Home – Results of Preliminary Experiment

Kazuyoshi Wada*,**, Takanori Shibata**,***, Takashi Asada****,
and Toshimitsu Musha*****

*Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University

**Intelligent Systems Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

***SORST, JST

****Department of Neuropsychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba

*****Brain Functions Lab., Inc.

Received:
April 18, 2007
Accepted:
August 22, 2007
Published:
December 20, 2007
Keywords:
mental commitment robot, robot therapy, psychotherapy, human-robot interaction, dementia
Abstract

In robot therapy for senile dementia patients, a seal-like robot, Paro, was left in patients’ homes for a week to determine its neuropsychological influence. Efficacy was evaluated by the diagnosis method of neuronal dysfunction (DIMENSION), which detects a lack of smoothness of scalp potential distribution resulting from cortical neuronal impairment by analyzing recorded a patient’s electroencephalogram (EEG). Interaction with Paro by patients was observed by their families. In a preliminary experiment, 5 subjects were studied after informed consent was received from them or their families in accordance with the medical ethics committee of the University of Tsukuba and the AIST ethics committee.

Cite this article as:
Kazuyoshi Wada, Takanori Shibata, Takashi Asada, and
and Toshimitsu Musha, “Robot Therapy for Prevention of Dementia at Home – Results of Preliminary Experiment,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.19, No.6, pp. 691-697, 2007.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] T. Shibata, K. Inoue, and R. Irie, “Emotional Robot for Intelligent System – Artificial Emotional Creature Project,” Proc. of 5th IEEE Int’l Workshop on ROMAN, pp. 466-471, 1996.
  2. [2] T. Shibata and R. Irie, “Artificial Emotional Creature for Human-Robot Interaction – A New Direction for Intelligent System,” Proc. of the IEEE/ASME Int’l Conf. on AIM’97 (Jun. 1997), paper number 47, 6 pages in CD-ROM Proc.
  3. [3] T. Shibata, M. Yoshida, and J. Yamato, “Artificial Emotional Creature for Human-Machine Interaction,” Proc. of the IEEE Int’l Conf. on SMC, pp. 2269-2274, 1997.
  4. [4] T. Shibata, T. Tashima, and K. Tanie, “Emergence of Emotional Behavior through Physical Interaction between Human and Robot,” Procs. of the 1999 IEEE ICRA, 1999.
  5. [5] T. Shibata, T. Tashima, and K. Tanie, “Subjective Interpretation of Emotional Behavior through Physical Interaction between Human and Robot,” Procs. of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1024-1029, 1999.
  6. [6] T. Shibata and K. Tanie, “Influence of A-Priori Knowledge in Subjective Interpretation and Evaluation by Short-Term Interaction with Mental Commit Robot,” Proc. of the IEEE Int’l Conf. on IROS, 2000.
  7. [7] T. Shibata, K. Wada, T. Saito, and K. Tanie, “Mental Commit Robot and its Application to Therapy of Children,” Proc. of the IEEE/ASME Int’l Conf. on AIM’01 (July. 2001), paper number 182, 6 pages in CD-ROM Proc.
  8. [8] T. Shibata, K. Wada, T. Saito, and K. Tanie, “Robot Assisted Activity for Senior People at Day Service Center,” Proc. of Int’l Conf. on ITM, pp. 71-76, 2001.
  9. [9] K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, and K. Tanie, “Effects of Robot Assisted Activity for Elderly People and Nurses at a Day Service Center,” Proc. of the IEEE, Vol.92, No.11, pp. 1780-1788, 2004.
  10. [10] K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, and K. Tanie, “Analysis of Factors that Bring Mental Effects to Elderly People in Robot Assisted Activity,” Proc. of the IEEE Int’l Conf. On Intelligent Robot and Systems, 2002.
  11. [11] T. Saito, T. Shibata, K. Wada, and K. Tanie, “Examination of Change of Stress Reaction by Urinary Tests of Elderly before and after Introduction of Mental Commit Robot to an Elderly Institution,” Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on AROB Vol.1, pp. 316-319, 2002.
  12. [12] K.Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, K. Sakamoto, and K. Tanie, “Psychological and Social Effects of One Year Robot Assisted Activity on Elderly People at a Health Service Facility for the Aged,” Proc. of IEEE ICRA, pp. 2796-2801, 2005.
  13. [13] K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Musha, and S. Kimura, “Effects of Robot Therapy for Demented Patients Evaluated by EEG,” Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Int’l Conf. on IROS, pp. 2205-2210, 2005.
  14. [14] K. Wada and T. Shibata, “Robot Therapy in a Care House – Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Effects on the Residents,” Proc. IEEE ICRA, pp. 3966-3971, 2006.
  15. [15] K. Wada and T. Shibata, “Robot Therapy in a Care House –Results of Case Studies–,” Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop ROMAN, pp. 581-586, 2006.
  16. [16] K. Wada and T. Shibata, “Living with Seal Robots in a Care House –Evaluations of Social and Physiological Influences–,” Proc. the IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. IROS, pp. 4940-4945, 2006.
  17. [17] T. Shibata, “Ubiquitous Surface Tactile Sensor,” 2004 1st IEEE TExCRA Proc., pp. 5-6, 2004.
  18. [18] T. Shibata, “An Overview of Human Interactive Robots for Psychological Enrichment,” Proc. of the IEEE, Vol.92, No.11, pp. 1749-1758, 2004.
  19. [19] I. Werry and K. Dautenhahn, “Applying Mobile Robot Technology to the Rehabilitation of Autistic Children,” Proc. of 7th Int. Symp. on Intelligent Robotic Systems, pp. 265-272, 1999.
  20. [20] B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, and A. Billard, “Robotic Assistants in Therapy and Education of Children with Autism: Can a Small Humanoid Robot Help Encourage Social Interaction Skills?” Journal of Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol.4, No.2, 2005.
  21. [21] A. Yokoyama, “The Possibility of the Psychiatric Treatment with a Robot as an Intervention –From the Viewpoint of Animal Therapy–,” Proc. of Joint 1st Int’l Conf. on SCIS and ISIS, paper number 23Q1-1, in CD-ROM Proc., 2002.
  22. [22] E. Libin and A. Libin, “Robotherapy: Definition, Assessment, and Case Study,” Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, pp. 906-915, 2002.
  23. [23] E. Ohkubo, T. Negishi, Y. Oyamada, R. Kimura, and M. Naganuma, “Studies on Necessary Condition of Companion Robot in the RAA Application,” Proc. of 2003 IEEE Int. Sympo. on CIRA, pp. 101-106, 2003.
  24. [24] M. Kanamori, M. Suzuki, and M. Tanaka, “Maintenance and Improvement of Quality of Life Among Elderly Patients Using a Pettype Robot,” Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi, Vol.39, No.2, pp. 214-218, 2002 (in Japanese).
  25. [25] T. Tamura, S. Yonemitsu, A. Itoh, D. Oikawa, A. Kawakami, Y. Higashi, T. Fujimoto, and K. Nakajima, “Is an Entertainment Robot Useful in the Care of Elderly People with Severe Dementia?” Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, Vol.59A, No.1, pp. 83-85, 2004.
  26. [26] M. M. Baum, N. Bergstrom, N. F. Langston, and L. Thoma, “Physiological Effects of Human/Companion Animal Bonding,” Nursing Research, Vol.33, No.3, pp. 126-129, 1984.
  27. [27] J. Gammonley and J. Yates, “Pet Projects Animal Assisted Therapy in Nursing Homes,” Journal of Gerontological Nursing, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 12-15, 1991.
  28. [28] M. Fujita and H. Kitano, “An Development of an Autonomous Quadruped Robot for Robot Entertainment,” Autonomous Robots, Vol.5, pp. 7-18, 1998.
  29. [29] ADI, “The prevalence of dementia,” Alzheimer’s Disease International Factsheet 3, 1999.
  30. [30] Science and Technology Committee, “Ageing: Scientific Aspects – 1st Report of Session 2005-06,” House of Lords: London, UK., Vol.I, 2005.
  31. [31] ADI, “Psychiatric and Behavioural Disturbances in Dementia,” Alzheimer’s Disease International Factsheet 7, March, 1999.
  32. [32] S. Kimura, T. Musha, K. Kaneko, K. Nishida, K. Sekine, and M. Ohu, “Effectiveness of the Creative Art Therapy by Using the Diagnosis Method of Neuronal Dysfunction (DIMENTION),” Report of Kansei Fukushi Research Center 3, pp. 195-200, 2002 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  33. [33] M. Brotons and S. M. Koger, “The impact of music therapy on language functioning in dementia,” J. Music Ther., Vol.37, No.3, pp. 183-195, 2000.
  34. [34] R. Kawashima, “Cognitive rehabilitation for Alzheimer disease-the learning therapy,” Rinsho Shinkeigaku, Vol.45, No.11, pp. 864-866, 2005 (in Japanese).
  35. [35] M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, “Mini-Mental State: a Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol.12, pp. 189-198, 1975.
  36. [36] J. C. Morris, “Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type,” Int. Psychogeriatr., Vol.9, Suppl.1, pp. 173-176, 1997.
  37. [37] E. Zamrini, S. De Santi, and M. Tolar, “Imaging is Superior to Cognitive testing for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease,” Neurobiol. Aging, Vol.25, No.5, pp. 685-691, 2004.
  38. [38] E.-L. Helkala, V. Laulumaa, and H. Soininen, “Different Patterns of Cognitive Decline Related to Normal or Deteriorating EEG in a 3-year Follow-up Study of Patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurology, 41, pp. 529-532, 1982.
  39. [39] D. St. Clair, I. Blackburn, D. Blackwood, and G. Tyrer, “Measuring the Course of Alzheimer’s disease: A Longitudinal Study of Neuropsychological Function and Changes in P3 Event-related Potential,” British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, pp. 48-54, 1988.
  40. [40] T. Musha, T. Asada, F. Yamashita, T. Kinoshita, Z. Chen, and H. Matsuda, “A New EEG Method for Estimating Cortical Neuronal Impairment That Is Sensitive to Early Stage Alzheimer’s Disease,” Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, pp. 1052-1058, 2002.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 01, 2021