single-rb.php

JRM Vol.16 No.5 pp. 513-519
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2004.p0513
(2004)

Paper:

Body-Supported Medical Robots: A Survey

Peter Berkelman**, Jocelyne Troccaz*, and Philippe Cinquin*

*TIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Institut de l’Ingénierie et de l’Information de Santé, Faculté de Médecine de Grenoble, 38706 La Tronche France

**Currently at Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawaii-Manoa

Received:
March 8, 2004
Accepted:
June 8, 2004
Published:
October 20, 2004
Keywords:
minimally invasive surgery, orthopedic surgery, medical robotics
Abstract

In medical robotics applications it is often advantageous for a robot to be directly mounted on or supported by the body of the patient during a medical procedure or examination. Whereas early medical robot systems were generally manipulator arms with a large base resting on the floor or mounted to the table next to the patient, several more recently developed systems rest directly on the patient. Body-supported medical robots can be designed to be much more compact and lightweight, leading to improved accuracy and safety and reduced cost, and are easier to set up and use in the operating room environment compared to conventional robot manipulator arms. Five examples of body-supported surgical robots are surveyed in this paper: The ARTHROBOT for total hip arthroplasty, PRAXITELES for knee arthroplasty, MARS for spinal pedicle screw placement and drill guiding, TER for remote ultrasound examinations, and LER for endoscope positioning in minimally invasive surgery.

Cite this article as:
Peter Berkelman, Jocelyne Troccaz, and Philippe Cinquin, “Body-Supported Medical Robots: A Survey,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.16, No.5, pp. 513-519, 2004.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] R. H. Taylor, and D. Stoianovici, “Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.19, pp. 922-926, October 2003.
  2. [2] Y. S. Kwoh, J. Hou, and E. A. J. et al., “A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic neurosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedicine, Vol.35, pp. 151-153, 1988.
  3. [3] S. Lavallée, J. Troccaz, L. Gaborit, P. Cinquin, A. L. Benabid, and D. Hoffmann, “Image guided robot: A clinical application in sterotactic neurosurgery,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Nice, France), pp. 618-625, 1992.
  4. [4] R. H. Taylor, H. A. Paul, P. Kazanzides, B. D. Mittelstadt, W. Hanson, J. F. Zuhars, B. Williamson, B. L. Musits, E. Glassman, and W. L. Bargar, “An image-guided robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.10, pp. 261-275, April 1994.
  5. [5] J. H. Chung, S. Y. Ko, D. S. Kwon, J. J. Lee, Y. S. Yoon, and C. H. Won, “Robot-assisted femoral stem implantation using an intramedulla gauge,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.19, pp. 885-892, October 2003.
  6. [6] C. Plaskos, E. Stindel, P. Cinquin, A. J. Hodgson, B. Faguer, and S. Lavalee, “Praxiteles: A universal bone-mounted robot for image free knee surgery - report on first cadaver trials,” in 4th Annual Meeting of CAOS-International Proceedings (F. Langlotz, B. L. Davies, and S. D. Stulberg, eds.), Chicago, pp. 67-68, International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, June 2004.
  7. [7] M. Shoham, M. Burman, E. Zehavi, L. Joskowicz, E. Batkilin, and Y. Kunicher, “Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.19, pp. 893-901, October 2003.
  8. [8] J. Troccaz, P. Cinquin, P. Berkelman, A. Vilchis-Gonzales, and E. Boidard, “Surgical robots at TIMC: Where we are and where we go.,” in 11th Annual Symposium of Robotics Research (Siena, Italy), October 2003.
  9. [9] A. Vilchis, J. Troccaz, P. Cinquin, K. Masuda, and F. Pellissier, “A new robot architecture for tele-echography,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol.19, pp. 922-926, October 2003.
  10. [10] P. J. Berkelman, E. Boidard, P. Cinquin, and J. Troccaz, “LER: The light endoscope robot,” in International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Las Vegas), IEEE/RSJ, pp. 2835-2840, October 2003.
  11. [11] B. Mittelstadt, P. Kazanzides, J. Zuhars, B. Williamson, P. Cain, F. Smith, and W. Bargar, “The evolution of a surgical robot from prototype to human clinical use,” in Computer Aided Surgery (R. H. Taylor, S. Lavallee, G. Burdea, and R. Mosges, eds.), MIT Press, pp. 397-407, 1996.
  12. [12] W. Siebert, and S. Mai, “One year clinical experience using the robot system caspar for TKR,” in 5th Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (Pittsburgh), pp. 141-142, 2001.
  13. [13] M. Jakopec, S. J. Harris, F. R. Y. Baena, P. Gomes, J. Cobb, and B. L. Davies, “The first clinical application of a hands-on robotic knee surgery system,” Computer Aided Surgery, Vol.6, pp. 329-339, 2001.
  14. [14] D. S. Kwon, J. J. Lee, Y. S. Yoon, S. Y. Ko, J. Kim, J. H. Chung, C. H. Won, and J. H. Kim, “The mechanism and the registration method of a surgical robot for hip arthroplasty,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Washington), pp. 1889-1894, May 2002.
  15. [15] M. Shohan, M. Burman, E. Zehavi, L. Joskowicz, E. Batkilin, and Y. Kuchiner, “Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical spinal procedures,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the International Society of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (Santa Fe), p. 59, June 2002.
  16. [16] S. E. Salcudean, W. H. Zhu, P. Abolmaesumi, S. Bachmann, and P. D. Lawrence, “A robot system for medical ultrasound,” in 9th International Symposium of Robotics Research, Springer, pp. 195-202, 2000.
  17. [17] M. Mitsuishi, S. I. Warisawa, T. Tsuda, T. Higuchi, N. Koizumi, H. Hashizume, and K. Fujiwara, “Remote ultrasound diagnostic system,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Seoul), pp. 1567-1574, May 2001.
  18. [18] S. Aiono, J. M. Gilbert, B. Soin, P. A. Finlay, and A. Gordon, “Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, Vol.16, pp. 1267-1270, September 2002.
  19. [19] W. P. Geis, H. C. Kim, E. J. B. Jr., P. C. McAfee, and Y. Wang, “Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures,” in Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: Health Care in the Information Age (San Diego), pp. 471-481, 1996.
  20. [20] J. M. Sackier, and Y. Wang, “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery: from concept to deve lopment,” in Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Appli cations (R. H. Taylor, S. Lavallee, G. C. Burdea, and R. Mosges, eds.), MIT Press, pp. 577-580, 1995.
  21. [21] Y. Kobayashi, S. Chiyoda, K. Watabe, M. Okada, and Y. Nakamura, “Small occupancy robotic mechanisms for endoscopic surgery,” in Medical Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) (Tokyo), pp. 75-82, September 2002.
  22. [22] P. Berkelman, P. Cinquin, E. Boidard, J. Troccaz, C. Létoublon, and J.-M. Ayoubi, “Design, control, and testing of a novel compact laparoscopic endoscope manipulator,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, Vol.217, No.4, pp. 329-341, 2003.
  23. [23] P. J. Berkelman, P. Cinquin, J. Troccaz, J.-M. Ayoubi, C. Létoublon, and F. Bouchard, “A compact, compliant laparoscopic endoscope manipulator,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Washington D.C.), IEEE, pp. 1870-1875, May 2002.
  24. [24] G. S. Guthart, and J. K. Salisbury, “The Intuitive (TM) telesurgery system: Overview and application,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (San Francisco), IEEE, pp. 618-621, April 2000.
  25. [25] H. Reichenspurner, R. Demaino, M. Mack, D. Boehm, H. Gulbins, C. Detter, B. Meiser, R. Ellgas, and B. Reichart, “Use of the voice controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery surgery bypass grafting,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol.118, 1999.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 20, 2021