The literature on the appropriate education criteria for training young emergency responders in developing countries is scarce. A gap exists between general education and emergency responder education regarding the criteria used for designing education courses and evaluating students. This study reviewed the criteria used at the University of Fire Prevention and Fighting in Vietnam. Although the university had used Bloom’s taxonomy, one of the well-known evaluation criteria for general education programs, in addition to the professional criteria for emergency management, only the bottom three levels of the taxonomy were considered. The authors designed a new training course to prepare and conduct landslide rescue exercises, and applied all six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate students’ performance and responses. The course included lectures, an exercise, and a hot debriefing session for 52 third-year students. Consideration of all levels of Bloom’s taxonomy enabled the identification of differences in learning performance between exercise participants and observers among the students. The evaluation results based on the general and professional education criteria differed regarding the performance of students with work experience. This study showed that the full use of Bloom’s taxonomy could help improve firefighters’ training courses. Assessing students from different perspectives using both general and professional education evaluation criteria is important for measuring students’ diverse abilities.

1. [1] K. Takemoto, Y. Motoya, and R. Kimura, “A proposal for effective emergency training and exercise program to improve competence for disaster response of disaster responders,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.5, No.2, pp. 197-207, 2010. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2010.p0197
2. [2] L. H. G. Hoang and T. Kato, “Use of analytic hierarchy process and four-component instructional design for improving emergency response exercises,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., Vol.87, Article No.103583, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103583
3. [3] R. M. Gagne, W. W. Wager, K. C. Golas, and J. M. Keller, “Principles of Instructional Design (5th Ed.),” Wadsworth Publishing, 2004.
4. [4] D. L. Kirkpatrick and J. D. Kirkpatrick, “Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels,” 3rd ed., Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
5. [5] L. J. López-Reyes, A. L. Jiménez-Gutiérrez, and D. Costilla-López, “The effects of blended learning on the performance of engineering students in mathematical modeling,” Educ. Sci., Vol.12, Article No.931, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120931
6. [6] A. Maffei, E. Boffa, F. Lupi, and M. Lanzetta, “On the design of constructively aligned educational unit,” Educ. Sci., Vol.12, Article No.438, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070438
7. [7] M. Pikhart and B. Klimova, “Utilization of linguistic aspects of Bloom’s Taxonomy in blended learning,” Educ. Sci., Vol.9, Article No.235, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030235
8. [8] M. M. Plack, M. Driscoll, M. Marquez, L. Cuppernull, J. Maring, and L. Greenberg, “Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified Bloom’s Taxonomy,” Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol.7, No.4, pp. 285-291, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2007.04.006
9. [9] A. F. Lee and A. V. Saenz, “An inclusive model for the urban search and rescue teams (USAR),” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17, No.7, pp. 1192-1198, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2022.p1192
10. [10] A. F. Lee and A. V. Saenz, “Sociocultural factors in urban search and rescue (USAR) teams of Central America and the Caribbean,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16, No.5, pp. 882-889, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2021.p0882
11. [11] B. Bloom, “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book I: Cognitive Domain,” David McKay, 1956.
12. [12] D. Krathwohl and L. Anderson (Eds.) “A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,” Longman, 2001.
13. [13] Q. Wang, “Reflections on achieving educational objectives of Bloom’s Taxonomy in the simulated course for tour guides in Shanghai,” J. Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, Vol.11, pp. 161-167, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.05.002
14. [14] K. Lamb, M. Farrow, C. Olymbios, D. Launder, and I. Greatbatch, “Systematic incident command training and organisational competence,” Int. J. Emergency Services, Vol.10, pp. 222-234, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-05-2020-0029
15. [15] Z. Dobrovic and N. Jovicic, “Crisis management curriculum development: Metamodeling approach,” Proc. of 16th Int. Technology, Education and Development Conf., pp. 1647-1655, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.0502
16. [16] D. V. Neal, “Teaching introduction to disaster management: A comparison of classroom and virtual environments,” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, Vol.22, No.1, pp. 103-116, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072700402200105
17. [17] T. Kadokura, “On the Human Resource Development of Firefighters in Japan,” Fire and Disaster Management College, 2013 (in Japanese). https://www.kaigai-shobo.jp/files/internationalforum/Human_resource_development.pdf [Accessed on January 23, 2023]
18. [18] R. H. Dave, “Psychomotor levels,” R. J. Armstrong (Ed.), “Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives,” Educational Innovators Press, 1970.
19. [19] M. Kalantzis and B. Cope, “New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education,” Cambridge University Press, 2012.
20. [20] R. Phelps, “Emergency Management Exercises: From Response to Recovery: Everything You Need to Know to Design a Great Exercise,” Chandi Media Publisher, 2010.
21. [21] W. G. Green III, “Exercise Alternatives for Training Emergency Management Command Center Staffs,” Universal-Publishers, 2000.
22. [22] V. V. Thuy et al., “Textbook on Basics of Rescue,” The University of Fire Prevention and Fighting, 2017 (in Vietnamese).
23. [23] U.S. Department of Homeland Security, “Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, USA, 2020. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/Homeland-Security-Exercise-and-Evaluation-Program-Doctrine-2020-Revision-2-2-25.pdf [Accessed January 23, 2023]
24. [24] N. T. To, T. Kato, M. Imai, M. Taninobu, K. Kohriyama, and S. Ito, “Developing a time-based evaluation method for functional exercises of emergency medical operations,” Safety, Vol.5, No.3, Article No.49, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5030049
25. [25] T. Kato, K. Kohriyama, S. Ito, H. Aso, and M. Taninobu, “Quantitative evaluation of organized disaster response capacity through functional exercises,” Society for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting, Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina, USA, December 11-15, 2016.
26. [26] J. Slick, “Teaching with cases in disaster and emergency management programs: Instructional design guidance,” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, Vol.37, No.1, pp. 57-91, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701903700106
27. [27] C. C. H. Chan, K. Chan, M.-S. Tsui, and A. Kwok, “Towards a competence-based evaluation framework: The personal growth of volunteers in a child injury prevention program,” J. Soc. Work, Vol.14, No.5, pp. 506-523, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017313479080