single-dr.php

JDR Vol.18 No.5 pp. 492-512
(2023)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2023.p0492

Material:

E-Defense Shake Table Experiments Implemented by NIED and Collaborative Research Projects in 2005–2022

Ryota Nishi*, Yohsuke Kawamata*, Ryuta Enokida** ORCID Icon, Takahito Inoue*, and Kentaro Tabata***,† ORCID Icon

*Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED)
1501-21 Nishikameya, Mitsuta, Shijimicho, Miki, Hyogo 673-0515, Japan

**International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University
Sendai, Japan

***Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED)
Tsukuba, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
December 27, 2022
Accepted:
May 24, 2023
Published:
August 1, 2023
Keywords:
E-Defense, shake table, earthquake engineering, full-scale experiments
Abstract

The three-dimensional full-scale earthquake testing facility, “E-Defense” was constructed using the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake as a lesson. Until October 2022, this facility has conducted 123 experiments as part of the research and development on earthquake engineering for various purposes (e.g., the clarification of destruction processes, evaluations of seismic structural performances, functional maintenance, collapse margins, and damage control technologies). Even after its commencement, large earthquakes that significantly affected human life and socioeconomic activities occurred such as the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake caused the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster. These earthquakes revealed some new challenges for disaster prevention and mitigation. Such issues have also been incorporated as subjects to be addressed by the facility. This article introduces the researches and developments using E-Defense, chronologically linking them with the major earthquakes occurred in Japan after 1995. By summarizing the activities, its near-future direction is also briefly indicated.

Cite this article as:
R. Nishi, Y. Kawamata, R. Enokida, T. Inoue, and K. Tabata, “E-Defense Shake Table Experiments Implemented by NIED and Collaborative Research Projects in 2005–2022,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.18 No.5, pp. 492-512, 2023.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Cabinet Office, “Section 1: Overview of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and damage.” Cabinet Office, “Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Reconstruction Journal,” 2000 (in Japanese). https://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/kyokun/pdf/101.pdf [Accessed November 16, 2022]
  2. [2] N. Ogawa, K. Ohtani, T. Katayama, and H. Shibata, “Construction of a three-dimensional, large-scale shaking table and development of core technology,” Philosophical Trans. of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol.359, No.1786, pp. 1725-1751, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0871
  3. [3] K. Ohtani et al., “Development of 3-D full scale earthquake testing facility (1) – A summary of construction plan and basic technical development –,” Report of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, No.58, pp. 169-185, 1998 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.24732/nied.00001095
  4. [4] M. Nakashima, T. Nagae, R. Enokida, and K. Kajiwara, “Experiences, accomplishments, lessons, and challenges of E-Defense—Tests using world’s largest shaking table,” Japan Architectural Review, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 4-17, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.10020
  5. [5] S. Zama, “Damage of oil storage tanks due to the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake and revision of design spectra for liquid sloshing,” BUTSURI-TANSA (Geophysical Exploration), Vol.59, No.4, pp. 353-362, 2006 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3124/segj.59.353
  6. [6] Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, “Proc. of the Niigata Chuetsu Earthquake Damage Assessment Meeting,” 2004 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM) of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Public Works Research Institute (PWRI), and Building Research Institute, “Report on damage to infrastructures and buildings by the 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake,” Technical Note of NILIM, No.439, 2008 (in Japanese).
  8. [8] Joint Editorial Committee for the Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster, “Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster: Building Series Volume 3 – Structural Damage to Steel Buildings, Structural Damage to Shell and Spatial Structures,” Maruzen Publishing, 2014 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] Architectural Institute of Japan, “Proc. for Symp. on Five Years After the Great East Japan Earthquake – Achievements and Remaining Challenges in Building Vibration Engineering,” 2016 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] Joint Editorial Committee for the Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster, “Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster: Nuclear Engineering Volume,” Maruzen Publishing, 2015 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] NILIM and Building Research Institute, “Quick report of the field survey on the building damage by the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake,” Technical Note of NILIM, No.929, 2016 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc., “Final report of Response Verification Committee on Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake,” 2018 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] T. Kabeyasawa, T. Kabeyasawa, T. Matsumori, T. Kabeyasawa, and Y. Kim, “3-D collapse tests and analyses of the three-story reinforced concrete buildings with flexible foundation,” J. W. Wallace (Ed.), “Structural Engineering Research Frontiers,” American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/40944(249)15
  14. [14] T. Kabeyasawa, T. Kabeyasawa, T. Matsumori, T. Kabeyasawa, and Y. Kim, “Shake table test on a full-scale three-story reinforced concrete building structure,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.73, No.632, pp. 1833-1840, 2008 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.73.1833
  15. [15] R. Motamed, I. Towhata, T. Honda, K. Tabata, and A. Abe, “Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-Defense large shake table test,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.51, pp. 35-46, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.007
  16. [16] C. Minowa et al., “Earthquake hazard mitigation of existing wood houses – Outline of research project,” 9th World Conf. on Timber Engineering 2006 (WCTE 2006), pp. 2544-2547, 2006.
  17. [17] I. Nakamura, H. Shimizu, C. Minowa, I. Sakamoto, and Y. Suzuki, “E-Defense experiments on full-scale wooden houses,” 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), 2008.
  18. [18] Central Disaster Prevention Council, “Expert Examination Committee Report on Measures Against Tokyo Metropolitan Earthquake,” 2005 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “About Important Survey Observation in the Future,” 2005 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] E. Sato, S. Furukawa, A. Kakehi, and M. Nakashima, “Full-scale shaking table test for examination of safety and functionality of base-isolated medical facilities,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.40, No.13, pp. 1435-1453, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1097
  21. [21] K. Kanazawa et al., “Vibration-based damage detection of a high-rise steel building before and after the E-Defense shaking table test,” 5th World Conf. on Structural Control and Monitoring, 5WCSCM-022, 2010.
  22. [22] Y.-L. Chung, T. Nagae, T. Matsumiya, and M. Nakashima, “Seismic resistance capacity of beam-column connections in high-rise buildings: E-Defense shaking table test,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamic, Vol.40, No.6, pp. 605-622, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1037
  23. [23] National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, “Earthquake Countermeasures Handbook for Hospital Staff: Familiar Measures to Protect Your Hospital Functions,” 2012 (in Japanese).
  24. [24] J. Kubota et al., “Collapse behavior of 18-story steel moment frame on shaking table test under long period ground motion,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.83, No.746, pp. 625-635, 2018 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.83.625
  25. [25] K. Sugimoto et al., “Collapse behavior of 6-story wall frame building during shaking table test: Research and development for quantification of collapse margin of RC buildings,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.82, No.741, pp. 1759-1768, 2017 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.82.1759
  26. [26] K. Shibata, H. Funahara, T. Nagao, Y. Kawamata, and S. Tamura, “E-Defense shaking table tests on damage mechanism of RC piles: Mutual influence between superstructure rocking response and RC pile damage,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.86, No.784, pp. 924-933, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.86.924
  27. [27] S. Tamura et al., “E-Defense shaking test and pushover analyses for lateral pile behavior in a group considering soil deformation in vicinity of piles,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.142, 106529, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106529
  28. [28] M. Yamazoe et al., “E-Defense shaking table test on soil-pile-structure interaction system: Evaluation of earthquake response of pile-supported RC structure Part 1,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.83, No.749, pp. 985-995, 2018 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.83.985
  29. [29] T. Nagae et al., “The 2019 full-scale shake table test program of wood dwellings,” 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), C002274, 2020.
  30. [30] T. Z. Yeow et al., “The 2019 Tokyo Metropolitan Resilience Project E-Defense test of a 3-story disaster management center,” 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), 2i-0020, 2020.
  31. [31] T. Z. Yeow, K. Kusunoki, I. Nakamura, and Y. Hibino, “Initial damage observations from an E-Defense shake table test of a building with post-disaster functions,” Proc. of the 2020 Japan Concrete Institute Annual Convention, 2124, 2020.
  32. [32] M. Kurata et al., “2020 E-Defense test for integrated structural, nonstructural and functionality assessment of medical facilities,” Proc. of 12th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 10361, 2022.
  33. [33] D. G. Lignos, T. Hikino, Y. Matsuoka, and M. Nakashima, “Collapse assessment of steel moment frames based on E-Defense full-scale shake table collapse tests,” J. of Structural Engineering, Vol.139, No.1, pp. 120-132, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000608
  34. [34] T. Sasaki and K. Kawashima, “Evaluation of development length based on an E-Defense shake table experiment on reinforced concrete bridge column with termination of longitudinal bars,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), Vol.65, No.1, pp. 434-441, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.65.434
  35. [35] T. Sasaki, S. Chen, and K. Kawashima, “Accuracy of evaluation of column bending moment based on E-Defense shake table experiment,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), Vol.65, No.1, pp. 442-449, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.65.442
  36. [36] C. Yenidogan et al., “Full-scale shake table tests of P&B type of Japanese three-story wood dwellings for the collapse characterization,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.150, 106898, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106898
  37. [37] Y. Kawamata, M. Nakayama, I. Towhata, and S. Yasuda, “Dynamic behaviors of underground structures in E-Defense shaking experiments,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.82, pp. 24-39, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.008
  38. [38] I. Nakamura, “Seismic safety capacity of a piping system with pipe supports based on the shake table test,” Proc. of the ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf. (PVP2013), Vol.8: Seismic Engineering, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2013-97852
  39. [39] T. Sasaki, A. Aoi, H. Tagawa, K. Kajiwara, and D. Sato, “Collapse mechanism of wide-area suspended ceiling based on full-scale shake table experiment of school gymnasium,” 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), 2935, 2017.
  40. [40] K. Kajiwara et al., “Shaking-table tests of a full-scale ten-story reinforced-concrete building (FY2015). Phase I: Free-standing system with base sliding and uplifting,” Engineering Structures, Vol.233, 111848, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111848
  41. [41] M. Yasuda, E. Sato, M. Yamada, K. Kajiwara, and M. Hayatsu, “Development of three-dimensional seismic isolation system using negative stiffness link mechanism and air levitation mechanism in series (Overview of prototype experimental device and report on full-scale 3-D seismic excitation experiment by E-Defense shaking table),” Trans. of the JSME, Vol.83, No.851, 17-00057, 2017 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.17-00057
  42. [42] J. Kang et al., “E-Defense test of a 10-story reinforced concrete building (FY 2018),” 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2020.
  43. [43] R. Enokida, T. Nagae, K. Kajiwara, X. Ji, and M. Nakashima, “Development of shaking table test techniques to realize large responses and evaluation of safety of a high-rise building,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.74, No.637, pp. 467-476, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.74.467
  44. [44] Y. Mizushima, Y. Mukai, H. Namba, K. Taga, and T. Saruwatari, “Super-detailed FEM simulations for full-scale steel structure with fatal rupture at joints between members—Shaking-table test of full-scale steel frame structure to estimate influence of cumulative damage by multiple strong motion: Part 1,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.81, No.719, pp. 61-70, 2016 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.81.61
  45. [45] H. Itoh et al., “Large-scale shake table test and numerical analysis of seawall seismic countermeasures for coastal reclaimed areas and peripheral facilities,” Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 3078-3085, 2019.
  46. [46] Y. Mukai, M. Yonezawa, M. Koshihara, Y. Saito, and Y. Suzuki, “Numerical modeling of traditional Japanese wooden structures based on full-scale shaking table test results,” Proc. of the World Conf. on Timber Engineering 2012 (WCTE 2012), Vol.2, pp. 429-436, 2012.
  47. [47] T. Asai et al., “Yield displacement evaluation of RC buildings examined based on shaking table test,” J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.87, No.795, pp. 464-474, 2022 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.87.464
  48. [48] L. Fahnestock et al., “Frame-spine system with force-limiting connections for low-damage seismic-resilient buildings,” Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA 2022), pp. 804-811, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03811-2_88

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 12, 2024