JDR Vol.18 No.5 pp. 485-491
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2023.p0485

Survey Report:

Establishment of Training System to Cope with Mental Health and Social Issues in Disaster Recovery Public Housing After the Great East Japan Earthquake

Masatsugu Orui*,**,† ORCID Icon

*Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University
2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573, Japan

**Sendai City Mental Health and Welfare Center
Sendai, Japan

Corresponding author

September 16, 2022
June 13, 2023
August 1, 2023
Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE), human-resource development, mental health, life support advisor, disaster recovery public housing

This study aimed to establish a training system for non-mental health professionals to cope with the mental health and social issues of impacted residents in disaster recovery public housing after more than 10 years since the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE). In September 2021, a group interview was conducted with seven life support advisors (LSAs) in charge of providing continuous support for impacted residents. These advisors possess a good understanding of the situation of impacted residents in disaster recovery public housing. Isolation emerged as an apparent issue, especially during the COVID-19 outbreak in which interactions among residents were reduced. Then, a training program for coping with isolation, as well as other issues identified through the interviews, such as delusions, troublesome behaviors, alcohol-related issues, wandering, suicidal ideation, and social withdrawal, was developed. For infection prevention and ease of obtaining training opportunities, this program was distributed online. Eleven participants were trained to use the developed program and were subsequently asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Results showed a considerable increase in the participants’ comprehension in addressing the impacted residents’ mental health issues. Although further investigation is warranted given that the representativeness and validity of our findings are somewhat limited, this study revealed the current situation of impacted residents in disaster recovery public housing following the GEJE. It also established a mental health training system for non-mental health professionals that addresses the identified issues. The developed training system for advisors would contribute to preparedness and risk reduction for future disasters.

Cite this article as:
M. Orui, “Establishment of Training System to Cope with Mental Health and Social Issues in Disaster Recovery Public Housing After the Great East Japan Earthquake,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.18 No.5, pp. 485-491, 2023.
Data files:
  1. [1] K. Murakami et al., “Planning innovation and post-disaster reconstruction: The case of Tohoku, Japan/Reconstruction of tsunami-devastated fishing villages in the Tohoku region of Japan and the challenges for planning/Post-disaster reconstruction in Iwate and new planning challenges for Japan/Towards a “network community” for the displaced town of Namie, FukushimaResilience design and community support in Iitate Village in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster/Evolving place governance innovations and pluralising reconstruction practices in post-disaster Japan,” Planning Theory & Practice, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 237-265, 2014.
  2. [2] I. Ueda, A. Sakuma, Y. Takahashi, W. Shoji, A. Nagao, M. Abe, Y. Suzuki, H. Matsuoka, and K. Matsumoto, “Criticism by community people and poor workplace communication as risk factors for the mental health of local welfare workers after the Great East Japan Earthquake: A cross-sectional study,” PLoS ONE, Vol.12, No.11, e0185930, 2017.
  3. [3] T. Honma, “Victims as Livelihood Support Members in Community Building: From the Perspective of Minami Sanrikuchō, Miyagi Prefecture,” The Annual Reports of the Tohoku Sociological Society, Vol.47, pp. 25-35, 2018 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] M. Saito, A. Fujita, A. Saito, and K. Takeishi, “Resilience in Post-disaster Reconstruction – A Comparative Study of Support for Affected Population between The Great East Japan Earthquake and the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake –,” Collaborative Research of Traditional Medicine and Nursing Science, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 30-40, 2020 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] R. Nitani and J. Goto, “Preventing social isolation: Otsuchi town after the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Environmental Hazards, Vol.21, No.5, pp. 379-399, 2022.
  6. [6] S. Tsukada and T. Morita, “Impression of the Reconstruction and Satisfaction with Life After the Great East Japan Earthquake: Tago Nishi’s Disaster Restoration Public Housing,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.8, pp. 1059-1065, 2019.
  7. [7] K. Koshiyama, “Problems in Housing Restoration After the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.2, No.5, pp. 335-348, 2007.
  8. [8] K. Shiragami, K. Kawano, N. Masaki, Y. Matoba, and T. Takeshima, “Mental health and involvement of residents of the Life Support Advisor in Iwate prefecture after the Great East Japan Earthquake: Suicide prevention in the affected area,” J. Ment. Health, Vol.59, pp. 75-83, 2013 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] M. Akazawa and H, Kato, “Evaluation of the training for supporters in the disaster area – awareness of support for residents and self-care –,” Japanese bulletin of traumatic stress studies, Vol.12, pp. 23-29, 2016 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] M. Orui, M. Fukasawa, N. Horikoshi, Y. Suzuki, and N. Kawakami, “Development and Evaluation of a Gatekeeper Training Program Regarding Anxiety about Radiation Health Effects Following a Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Single-Arm Intervention Pilot Trial,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol.17, No.12, 4594, 2020.
  11. [11] Y. Honda, “Rehabilitation of Elderly Victims of the Great East Japan Earthquake: Examining Post-Disaster Public Housing in X City, Miyagi Prefecture,” Fukuoka University Review of Literature & Humanities, Vol.49, No.3, pp. 679-711, 2017 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] Miyagi Prefecture Government, “2020 disaster disaster recovery public housing residents health survey,” 2021 (in Japanese). [Accessed February 8, 2023]
  13. [13] Sendai City Official Movie Channel: Sendai Tubem, “For supporting residents with mental health problems and dementia,” 2022 (in Japanese). [Accessed February 8, 2023]
  14. [14] M. Orui, S. Saeki, S. Harada, and M. Hayashi, “Practical Report of Disaster-Related Mental Health Interventions Following the Great East Japan Earthquake during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Potential for Suicide Prevention,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol.18, No.19, 10424, 2021.
  15. [15] M. Kako and S. Ikeda, “Volunteer experiences in community housing during the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,” Japan Nurs. Health Sci., Vol.11, No.4, pp. 357-359, 2009.
  16. [16] W. duPont IV, I. Noy, Y. Okuyama, and Y. Sawada, “The Long-Run Socio-Economic Consequences of a Large Disaster: The 1995 Earthquake in Kobe,” PLoS One, Vol.10, No.10, e0138714, 2015.
  17. [17] T. Sekiguchi, Y. Hagiwara, Y. Sugawara, Y. Tomata, F. Tanji, Y. Yabe, E. Itoi, and I. Tsuji, “Moving from prefabricated temporary housing to public reconstruction housing and social isolation after the Great East Japan Earthquake: a longitudinal study using propensity score matching,” BMJ Open, Vol.9, No.3, e026354, 2019.
  18. [18] M. Suwa and K. Suzuki, “The phenomenon of ‘hikikomori’ (social withdrawal) and the socio-cultural situation in Japan today,” J. Psychopathology, Vol.19, pp. 191-198, 2013.
  19. [19] K. Yoshioka-Maeda, M. Kuroda, and M. Kageyama, “National Survey of the Neighborhood Claim about Mentally Ill Persons and Relevant Difficulties for Public Health Nurses – Comparison with Years of Mental Health and Welfare Experiences –,” J. Japan Academy of Community Health Nursing, Vol.20, No.1, pp. 69-78, 2017 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] K. Iijima, S. Yamaguchi, N. Watanabe, and A. Ayabe, “Difficulties That Municipal Public Health Nurses Who Support People with Mental Illnesses Experience Regarding Personal Interaction and Support Provision,” Japanese J. Public Health Nursing, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 144-153, 2016 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 29, 2023