single-dr.php

JDR Vol.17 No.6 pp. 985-999
(2022)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2022.p0985

Review:

Contributions of E-Defense Shaking Table to Earthquake Engineering and its Future

Toshihiko Horiuchi*1,†, Makoto Ohsaki*2, Masahiro Kurata*3, Julio A. Ramirez*4,*5, Takuzo Yamashita*1, and Koichi Kajiwara*1

*1Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience
1501-21 Nishikameya, Mitsuda, Shijimicho, Miki, Hyogo 673-0515, Japan

Corresponding author

*2Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

*3Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

*4Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

*5Network Coordination Office, Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure, West Lafayette, USA

Received:
April 6, 2022
Accepted:
July 9, 2022
Published:
October 1, 2022
Keywords:
E-Defense, earthquake engineering, shaking table experiment, numerical simulation, data publication
Abstract

A shaking table is an experimental facility consisting of a table that loads a structural specimen and actuators that produce acceleration of the table to simulate seismic motions. This is a powerful tool in earthquake engineering because it permits direct observation of the seismic responses of structures under controlled conditions. The 3-D Full-Scale Earthquake Testing Facility, known by its nickname as “E-Defense,” is the largest facility of its kind in terms of table size and operated by National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED). Since its start of operations in 2005, E-Defense has been contributing to earthquake engineering through as many as 113 experimental projects successfully completed as of fiscal year 2020. To elucidate its future operations as well as to provide other similar facilities with useful knowledge, this paper reviews the E-Defense experiences of operations and research conducted, shares the lessons learned from the experiences, and proposes the future challenges for continued contributions to earthquake engineering, by covering: the history of E-Defense facility operations and its challenges; the contributions of E-Defense to numerical simulation, another important area in earthquake engineering complementing experiment; publications of experimental data and metadata from E-Defense experiments; and international collaborations in experimental research projects.

Cite this article as:
T. Horiuchi, M. Ohsaki, M. Kurata, J. Ramirez, T. Yamashita, and K. Kajiwara, “Contributions of E-Defense Shaking Table to Earthquake Engineering and its Future,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17, No.6, pp. 985-999, 2022.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] National Research Council, “Grand Challenges in Earthquake Engineering Research: A Community Workshop Report,” The National Academies Press, 2011.
  2. [2] L. Van Den Einde et al., “NHERI@UC San Diego 6-DOF large high-performance outdoor shake table facility,” Front. Built Environ., Vol.6, Article No.580333, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.580333, 2021.
  3. [3] National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Tainan Laboratory, https://www.ncree.narl.org.tw/about/laboratory [accessed January 19, 2022]
  4. [4] J. C. Queval and P. Sollogoub, “Large scale seismic tests performed on the table Azalee of CEA – Reproducibility of seismic motions,” Trans. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 14), pp. 237-245, 1997.
  5. [5] MTS System Corporation, “MTS awarded seismic simulation project valued at over $70 million for China’s National Facility for Earthquake Engineering Simulation at Tianjin University,” March 25, 2020, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mts-awarded-seismic-simulation-project-valued-at-over-70-million-for-chinas-national-facility-for-earthquake-engineering-simulation-at-tianjin-university-301029405.html [accessed January 19, 2022]
  6. [6] Guinness World Records, “Largest 3D earthquake shake table,” https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/largest-3d-earthquake-shake-table [accessed January 19, 2022]
  7. [7] K. Ohtani et al., “Construction on E-Defense (3-D full-scale earthquake testing facility),” Proc. of 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.189, 2004.
  8. [8] M. Nakashima et al., “Experiences, accomplishments, lessons, and challenges of E-defense – Tests using world’s largest shaking table,” Jpn. Archit. Rev., Vol.1, No.1, pp. 4-17, doi: 10.1002/2475-8876.10020, 2018.
  9. [9] C. A. Blain et al., “The network coordination office of NHERI (Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure),” Front. Built Environ., Vol.6, Article No.108, pp. 67-79, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.00108, 2020.
  10. [10] J. A. Ramirez, “The George E. Brown, Jr., Network for earthquake engineering simulation (NEES): Reducing the impact of EQs and tsunamis,” Proc. of the 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2012.
  11. [11] Hyogo Earthquake Engineering Research Center, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED), “Introduction,” https://www.bosai.go.jp/hyogo/ehyogo/profile/introduction/Introduction.html [accessed January 19, 2022]
  12. [12] H. Shibata et al., “Outline of recent proving tests on the seismic reliability of components for NPPs in NUPEC,” Trans. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-14), pp. 279-284, 1997.
  13. [13] Y. Mouri, “Large-scale high-performance shaking table at Tadotsu Engineering Laboratory,” J. At. Energy Soc. Jpn., Vol.52, No.11, pp. 715-718, doi: 10.3327/jaesjb.52.11_715, 2010 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] K. Tabata, H. Nakazawa, and K. Kajiwara, “E-Defense improved performance and possible geotechnical model tests on liquefaction behaviors for saturation evaluation,” Proc. of the 16th World Conf. on Earthquake (16WCEE), Paper No.1492, 2017.
  15. [15] M. Yamamoto, H. Hamaguchi, and T. Kinoshita, “Estimation of response distribution for seismically isolated buildings during 2016 Kumamoto earthquake,” J. Jpn. Assoc. Earthq. Eng., Vol.17, No.1, pp. 1_77-1_84, doi: 10.5610/jaee.17.1_77, 2017.
  16. [16] Kajima Technical Research Institute, “High performance 3-dimensional shaking table system,” https://www.kajima.co.jp/english/tech/katri/research/fac_shindou/index.html [accessed January 20, 2022]
  17. [17] K. Kajiwara et al., “2015 three-dimensional shaking table test of a 10-story reinforced concrete building on the E-Defense,” Proc. of the 16th World Conf. on Earthquake (16WCEE), Paper No.4012, 2017.
  18. [18] V. Saouma and M. Sivaselvan (Eds.), “Hybrid simulation: Theory, implementation and applications,” Taylor & Francis, 2008.
  19. [19] T. Horiuchi et al., “Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system using a shaking table (Proposal of experiment concept and feasibility study with rigid secondary system),” JSME Int. J., Ser. C Mech. Syst. Mach. Elem. Manuf., Vol.42, No.2, pp. 255-264, doi: 10.1299/jsmec.42.255, 1999.
  20. [20] A. Igarashi, H. Iemura, and T. Suwa, “Development of substructured shaking table test method,” Proc. of 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE), Paper No.1775, 2000.
  21. [21] I. Nagashima et al., “Multi-cyclic dynamic loading experiment of full-scale devices for seismic isolation against long-period earthquake motions – Preliminary study –,” Proc. of 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Paper No.35, 2012.
  22. [22] Y. Kawamata, “Earthquake engineering research facilities in NIED: Possible contributions to international disaster mitigation,” Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Archi-Cultural Interactions Through the Silk Road, pp. 198-201, 2016.
  23. [23] F. Yamashita et al., “Scale dependence of rock friction at high work rate,” Nature, Vol.528, No.7581, pp. 254-257, doi: 10.1038/nature16138, 2015.
  24. [24] T. Horiuchi et al., “Study concept on the development of urban cyber physical system for enhancing capability to respond to large-scale earthquakes,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.16, No.2, pp. 287-297, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0287, 2017.
  25. [25] J. W. Berman et al., “Natural hazards reconnaissance with the NHERI RAPID facility,” Front. Built Environ., Vol.6, Article No.573067, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.573067, 2020.
  26. [26] M. Aghababaei et al., “Full-scale shake table test damage data collection using terrestrial laser-scanning techniques,” J. Struct. Eng., Vol.147 No.3, Article No.04020356, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002905, 2021.
  27. [27] M. Sato and T. Inoue, “General frame work of research topics utilizing the 3-D full-scale earthquake testing facility,” J. Jpn. Assoc. Earthq. Eng., Vol.4, No.3, pp. 448-456, doi: 10.5610/jaee.4.3_448, 2004.
  28. [28] Tokyo Metropolitan Resilience Project, https://forr.bosai.go.jp/e/ [accessed January 19, 2022]
  29. [29] T. Nagae et al., “The 2019 full-scale shake table test program of wood dwellings,” Proc. of the 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), Paper No.C002274, 2020.
  30. [30] T. Z. Yeow et al., “The 2019 Tokyo metropolitan resilience project E-Defense test of a 3-story disaster management center,” Proc. of the 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), 2i-0020, 2020.
  31. [31] M. Kurata et al., “2020 E-Defense test for integrated structural, nonstructural and functionality assessment of medical facilities,” Proc. of 12th the National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Article No.10361, 2022.
  32. [32] Tokyo Metropolitan Resilience Project, “R&D activities – Subprojects (c),” https://forr.bosai.go.jp/e/sub_c.html [accessed January 19, 2022]
  33. [33] E. Sato et al., “Study on function maintenance in indoor space during earthquake, Part1 outline of study,” Summary for AIJ Annual Meeting, Structure 2, Vol.2019, pp. 307-308, 2019 (in Japanese).
  34. [34] M. Hori, H. Noguchi, and T. Ine, “Research plan of developing E-Simulator as part of E-Defense project,” Proc. of the JSCE Earthquake Engineering Symp., Vol.29, pp. 1420-1425, doi: 10.11532/proee2005a.29.1420, 2007 (in Japanese).
  35. [35] M. Ohsaki, T. Miyamura, and J. Y. Zhang, “A piecewise linear isotropic-kinematic hardening model with semi-implicit rules for cyclic loading and its parameter identification,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., Vol.111, No.4, pp. 303-333, doi: 10.3970/cmes.2016.111.303, 2016.
  36. [36] T. Miyamura et al., “Dynamic FE simulation of four-story steel frame modeled by solid elements and its validation using results of full-scale shake-table test,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.44, No.9, pp. 1449-1469, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2526, 2015.
  37. [37] T. Miyamura et al., “Coupled structural and heat conduction FE analysis of laminated high damping rubber bearing,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.50, No.9, pp. 2462-2487, doi: 10.1002/eqe.3455, 2021.
  38. [38] S. Yamada et al., “Collapse experiment on 4-story steel moment frame: Part 1 outline of test results,” Proc. of 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), 2008.
  39. [39] H. Ukon et al., “Large-scale shake table experiment on a component model (C1-1model) using E-Defense – Experiment on a RC column build in 1970s which fails in flexure –,” Technical Note of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, No.331, doi: 10.24732/nied.00001945, 2009 (in Japanese).
  40. [40] S. Okazawa et al., “Finite element seismic response analysis of a reinforced concrete pier with a fractured fine tetrahedron mesh,” J. Earthq. Tsunami, Vol.10, No.5, Article No.1640013, doi: 10.1142/S1793431116400133, 2016.
  41. [41] Y. Kawamata et al., “Dynamic behaviors of underground structures in E-Defense shaking experiments,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol.82, pp. 24-39, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.008, 2016.
  42. [42] M. K. Pal and T. Yamashita, “Construction of high-fidelity finite element model for large-scale parallel seismic analysis of soil-underground structure,” J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng., Ser. A2 (Applied Mechanics (AM)), Vol.73, No.2, pp. I_729-I_738, doi: 10.2208/jscejam.73.I_729, 2017.
  43. [43] M. Ohsaki et al., “Finite-element analysis of laminated rubber bearing of building frame under seismic excitation,” Eathq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.44, No.11, pp. 1881-1898, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2570, 2015.
  44. [44] H. Omura, T. Yamashita, and D. Isobe, “Improvement of suspended ceiling collapse simulation and numerical investigation on the collapse mechanism,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.85, No.773, pp. 891-898, doi: 10.3130/aijs.85.891, 2020 (in Japanese).
  45. [45] D. Isobe et al., “Motion analysis of furniture under seismic excitation using the finite element method,” Jpn. Archit. Rev., Vol.1, No.1, pp. 44-55, doi: 10.1002/2475-8876.1015, 2018.
  46. [46] E. Sato et al., “Full-scale shaking table tests for assessment of functionality in medical facility: Evaluation of safety and functionality in city facility during earthquake,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.75, No.650, pp. 771-780, doi: 10.3130/aijs.75.771, 2010 (in Japanese).
  47. [47] T. Sasaki et al., “Design and structural response of full-scale steel gymnasium specimen: E-Defense shake table experiment on collapse mechanism of wide-area suspended ceiling in gymnasium part 1,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.82, No.736, pp. 831-841, doi: 10.3130/aijs.82.831, 2017 (in Japanese).
  48. [48] M. Shiratori, “Why the quality assurance of computing is so important now?,” Proc. of the 16th Computational Mechanics Conf., pp. 731-732, doi: 10.1299/jsmecmd.2003.16.731, 2003 (in Japanese).
  49. [49] American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), “Standard for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics,” ASME V&V 10-2019, 2019.
  50. [50] A. Der Kiureghian and O. Ditlevsen, “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?,” Struct. Saf., Vol.31, No.2, pp. 105-112, doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020, 2009.
  51. [51] B. Do and M. Ohsaki, “Bayesian optimization for inverse identification of cyclic constitutive law of structural steels from cyclic structural tests,” Structures, Vol.38, pp. 1079-1097, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.054, 2022.
  52. [52] Hyogo Earthquake Engineering Research Center, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED), “Data sharing,” https://www.bosai.go.jp/hyogo/asebi/dataopen_1.html (in Japanese) [accessed January 19, 2022]
  53. [53] ASEBI, https://www.bosai.go.jp/hyogo/asebi/asebi_temp/index.html [accessed January 19, 2022]
  54. [54] Y. Ikeda, “Verification of system identification utilizing shaking table tests of a full-scale 4-story steel building,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.45, No.4, pp. 543-562, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2670, 2016.
  55. [55] H. Pan, K. Kusunoki, and Y. Hattori, “Capacity-curve-based damage evaluation approach for reinforced concrete buildings using seismic response data,” Eng. Struct., Vol.197, Article No.109386, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109386, 2019.
  56. [56] Y. Kim et al., “Numerical study of a full-scale six-story reinforced concrete wall-frame structure tested at E-Defense,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.41, No.8, pp. 1217-1239, doi: 10.1002/eqe.1179, 2012.
  57. [57] T. Uesaka et al., “Physical parameters identification for full-scale ten-story reinforced concrete building with degrading tri-linear model by modal iterative error correction method,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.51, No.1, pp. 153-168, doi: 10.1002/eqe.3560, 2022.
  58. [58] Y. Tosauchi et al., “Three-dimensional shaking table test of a ten story RC frame (2015): Test methods and the responses in case of sliding bases,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. of AIJ), Vol.83, No.750, pp. 1139-1149, doi: 10.3130/aijs.83.1139, 2018 (in Japanese).
  59. [59] Earthquake Spectra, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/eqs [accessed March 11, 2022]
  60. [60] J. of Structural Engineering, https://ascelibrary.org/journal/jsendh [accessed March 11, 2022]
  61. [61] E. M. Rathje et al., “Enhancing research in natural hazards engineering through the DesignSafe cyberinfrastructure,” Front. Built Environ., Vol.6, Article No.547706, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.547706, 2020.
  62. [62] DesignSafe-CI, “Curation & publication policies,” https://www.designsafe-ci.org/rw/user-guides/curating-publishing-projects/policies/ [accessed March 11, 2022]
  63. [63] A. Ceccotti et al., “SOFIE project – 3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol.42, No.13, pp. 2003-2021, doi: 10.1002/eqe.2309, 2013.
  64. [64] DesignSafe-CI, “Data depot, published (NEES),” https://www.designsafe-ci.org/data/browser/public-legacy/ [accessed March 11, 2022]
  65. [65] X. Ma et al., “Large-scale shaking table test of steel braced frame with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses,” Proc. of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.1248, 2010.
  66. [66] J. W. van de Lindt et al., “Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building,” J. Struct. Eng., Vol.136, No 10, pp. 1262-1272, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000222, 2010.
  67. [67] K. L. Ryan et al., “Seismic simulation of an integrated ceiling-partition wall-piping system at E-Defense. I: Three-dimensional structural response and base isolation,” J. Struct. Eng., Vol.142, No.2, Article No.04015130, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001384, 2016.
  68. [68] S. Soroushian et al., “Seismic simulation of an integrated ceiling-partition wall-piping system at E-Defense. II: Evaluation of nonstructural damage and fragilities,” J. Struct. Eng., Vol.142, No.2, Article No.04015131, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001385, 2016.
  69. [69] DesignSafe-CI, “NHERI partnerships: NIED and E-Defense,” https://www.designsafe-ci.org/facilities/nco/partnerships/nied/ [accessed March 11, 2022]
  70. [70] L. Fahnestock et al., “U.S.-Japan collaboration for shake table testing of a frame-spine system with force-limiting connections,” Proc. of the 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE), 2021.
  71. [71] Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI), National Science Foundation (NSF), https://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=CMMI [accessed March 11, 2022]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 01, 2022