single-dr.php

JDR Vol.17 No.5 pp. 791-804
(2022)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2022.p0791

Paper:

Applying the Particle Filter to the Volcanic Ash Tracking PUFF Model for Assimilating Multi-Parameter Radar Observation

Hiroshi L. Tanaka*1,†, Haruhisa Nakamichi*2, Keiichi Kondo*3,*4, Shoichi Akami*5, and Masato Iguchi*2

*1Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba
1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan

Corresponding author

*2Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kagoshima, Japan

*3Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan

*4Numerical Prediction Division, Information Infrastructure Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan

*5Doctoral Program in Geosciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Received:
December 27, 2021
Accepted:
June 24, 2022
Published:
August 1, 2022
Keywords:
PUFF model, particle filter, MP radar, data assimilation, Sakura-jima volcano
Abstract

In this study, a new data assimilation method called “particle filter” was applied to the volcanic plume tracking model called PUFF to assimilate the Multi-parameter (MP) radar observations at Sakura-jima volcano. In the particle filter algorithm, the statistical likelihood was computed for each ash particle of the model given the observed MP radar data. Particles with a high likelihood were retained, but particles with a low likelihood were removed from the computation. The removal was followed by resampling of new particles at high-likelihood locations. The results show that the particle filter works properly to generate suitable new particles in the open space between the model and the observed particles. As the plume shape of MP radar observation is an important information source, observed particles were added at the resampling stage of the particle filter. A proper threshold value for removing or retaining the particles was examined using likelihood estimation. In this study, we determined the proper threshold to resample approximately half of the model particles. The results of the analysis show a reasonable mix of observed, predicted, and resampled data at proper locations, filling the open space between the prediction and the observation. It was found that data assimilation using the particle filter is a suitable method for assimilating the MP radar observation to the PUFF model prediction. This study demonstrates that the new PUFF model system, combined with real-time MP radar data using a particle filter, is highly reliable and useful for preventing volcanic hazards around active volcanoes.

Cite this article as:
H. Tanaka, H. Nakamichi, K. Kondo, S. Akami, and M. Iguchi, “Applying the Particle Filter to the Volcanic Ash Tracking PUFF Model for Assimilating Multi-Parameter Radar Observation,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17, No.5, pp. 791-804, 2022.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Prevention of ash fallout hazard for an explosive eruption case: Hypothetical ash fallout over Tokyo metropolitan by Mt. Fuji eruption,” 2020, http://www.bousai.go.jp/kazan/kouikikouhaiworking/pdf/syutohonbun.pdf (in Japanese) [accessed July 12, 2022]
  2. [2] P. V. Hobbs, L. F. Radke, J. H. Lyons, R. J. Ferek, D. J. Coffman, and T. J. Casadevall, “Airborne measurements of particle and gas emissions from the 1990 volcanic eruption of Mount Redoubt,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, Vol.96, No.D10, pp. 18735-18752, 1991.
  3. [3] T. J. Casadevall, “The 1989–1990 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska: Impacts on aircraft operations.” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.62, Nos.1-4, pp. 301-316, 1994.
  4. [4] S. Onodera, “Volcanic activity and flight operations,” Aviation Meteorological Notes, Vol.45, pp. 13-30, 1997.
  5. [5] H. L. Tanaka, “Development of a prediction scheme for the volcanic ash fall from Redoubt volcano,” 1st Int. Symp. on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety: Program and Abstracts, p. 44, 1991.
  6. [6] H. L. Tanaka, “Development of a prediction scheme for volcanic ash fall from Redoubt volcano, Alaska,” Proc. of 1st Int. Symp. on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety, pp. 283-291, 1994.
  7. [7] C. Searcy, K. Dean, and W. Stringer, “PUFF: A high-resolution volcanic ash tracking tracking model,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., Vol.80, Nos.1-2, pp. 1-16, 1998.
  8. [8] K. G. Dean, S. I. Akasofu, and H. L. Tanaka, “Volcanic hazards and aviation safety: Developing techniques in Alaska,” FAA Aviation Safety J., Vol.3, No.1, pp. 11-15, 1993.
  9. [9] H. L. Tanaka, K. G. Dean, and S. I. Akasofu, “Predicting the movement of volcanic ash clouds,” Eos Trans., Vol.74, No.20, p. 231, 1993.
  10. [10] S.-I. Akasofu, and H. L. Tanaka, “Urgent issue of developing volcanic ash tracking model,” Kagaku Asahi, Vol.53, No.5, pp. 121-124, 1993 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] H. L. Tanaka and K. Yamamoto, “Numerical simulations of volcanic plume dispersal from Usu volcano in Japan on 31 March 2000 using PUFF model,” Earth, Planets and Space, Vol.54, No.7, pp. 743-752, 2002.
  12. [12] H. L. Tanaka, M. Iguchi, and S. Nakada, “Numerical simulations of volcanic ash plume dispersal from Kelud volcano in Indonesia on February 13, 2014,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 31-42, 2016.
  13. [13] H. L. Tanaka and M. Iguchi, “Numerical simulations of volcanic ash plume dispersal from Kuchinoerabujima on 29 May 2015,” J. Nat. Disaster Sci., Vol.37, No.2, pp. 79-90, 2016.
  14. [14] H. L. Tanaka and M. Iguchi, “Numerical simulations of volcanic ash plume dispersal for Sakura-Jima using real-time emission rate estimation,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.1, pp. 160-172, 2019.
  15. [15] H. L. Tanaka, H. Nakamichi, and M. Iguchi, “PUFF model prediction of volcanic ash plume dispersal for Sakurajima using MP radar observation,” Atmosphere, Vol.11, No.11, Article No.1240, doi: 10.3390/atmos11111240, 2020.
  16. [16] M. Iguchi, “Prediction of volume of volcanic ash ejected from Showa crater of Sakurajima volcano, Japan,” Annuals of Disaster Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No.55B, pp. 169-175, 2012 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] M. Iguchi, “Method for real-time evaluation of discharge rate of volcanic ash – Case study on intermittent eruptions at the Sakurajima volcano, Japan –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 4-14, 2016.
  18. [18] M. Maki, M. Iguchi, T. Maesaka, T. Miwa, T. Tanada, T. Kozono, T. Momotani, A. Yamaji, and I. Kakimoto, “Preliminary results of weather radar observations of Sakurajima volcanic smoke,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 15-30, 2016.
  19. [19] H. Nakamichi, M. Iguchi, M. Shimomura, and Y. Takenaka, “Deployment of small-size X-band multi-parameter radars near volcanoes in southern Kyushu, Japan and observation of eruption plumes,” DPRI Annuals, No.61B, pp. 337-343, 2018 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] G. Kitagawa, “On Monte Carlo filter and smoother,” Proc. of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Vol.44, No.1, pp. 31-48, 1996 (in Japanese).
  21. [21] A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon, “An introduction to sequential Monte Carlo methods,” A. Doucet, N. Freitas, and N. Gordon (Eds.), “Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice,” pp. 3-14, Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9_1, 2001.
  22. [22] P. J. van Leeuwen, ”Particle filtering in geophysical systems,” Mon. Weather Rev., Vol.137, No.12, pp. 4089-4114, doi: 10.1175/2009MWR2835.1, 2009.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 05, 2022