JDR Vol.17 No.2 pp. 218-229
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2022.p0218


When is a CAT Index Futures Traded and Preferred to Reinsurance? – Tradeoff Between Basis Risk and Adverse Selection –

Kazuhiko Ohashi

Graduate School of Business Administration, Hitotsubashi University
2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-8439, Japan

Corresponding author

March 8, 2017
September 1, 2020
February 1, 2022
insurance-linked securities (ILS), reinsurance, CAT (catastrophe) futures, basis risk, adverse selection

Insurance risks have traditionally been borne in reinsurance markets. However, in the 1990s, after a series of huge natural disasters, and consequently massive insurance payments, the reinsurance markets reduced their capacity to bear risks. Insurance-linked securities, such as CAT (catastrophe) index futures contracts, were created to provide insurers with a way to transfer insurance risks to capital markets. However, two obstacles are preventing CAT index futures from being traded: the basis risk between insurers’ risks and the futures payoff, and adverse selection between informed insurers and uninformed investors in capital markets. This study investigates the conditions under which CAT index futures, whose payoff is the average of insurers’ losses, can be traded, and insurers choose CAT index futures rather than reinsurance to transfer their risks. The results show a trade-off: CAT index futures can be traded if the number of insurers in the index is large enough, since averaging multiple insurers’ losses can mitigate adverse selection in the index futures’ payoff. However, if the number of insurers in the index is too large, insurers prefer reinsurance to index futures due to the high basis risk in the futures’ payoff.

Cite this article as:
K. Ohashi, “When is a CAT Index Futures Traded and Preferred to Reinsurance? – Tradeoff Between Basis Risk and Adverse Selection –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.17 No.2, pp. 218-229, 2022.
Data files:
  1. [1] S. Ganapati, M. Retik, P. Puleo, and B. Starr, “Catastrophe-Linked Securities,” F. J. Fabozzi (Ed.), “Handbook of Structured Financial Products,” Chapter 20, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
  2. [2] J. D. Cummins and P. Barrieu, “Innovation in Insurance Markets: Hybrid and Securitized Risk-Transfer Solutions,” G. Dionne (Ed.), “Handbook of Insurance,” pp. 547-602, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0155-1_20, Springer, 2013.
  3. [3] G. Carpenter, “Catastrophe Bond Update: Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015,” Marsh & McLennan, 2015.
  4. [4] F. O. Kist and G. Meyers, “Evaluating the effectiveness of index- based insurance derivatives in hedging property/casualty insurance transactions,” American Academy of Actuaries Index Securitization Task Force, 1999.
  5. [5] J. A. Major, “Index Hedge Performance: Insurer Market Penetration and Basis Risk,” K. A. Froot, (Ed.), “The Financing of Catastrophe Risk,” Chapter 10, The University of Chicage Press, 1999.
  6. [6] N. A. Doherty, “Innovations in Managing Catastrophe Risk,” J. of Risk and Insurance, Vol.64, No.4, pp. 713-718, 1997.
  7. [7] N. A. Doherty and A. Richter, “Moral Hazard, Basis Risk, and Gap Insurance,” J. of Risk and Insurance, Vol.69, No.1, pp. 9-24, 2002.
  8. [8] S. Harrington and G. Niehaus, “Basis Risk with PCS Catastrophe Insurance Derivative Contracts,” J. of Risk and Insurance, Vol.66, No.1, pp. 49-82, 1999.
  9. [9] J. D. Cummins, D. Lalonde, and R. D. Phillips, “The Basis Risk of Catastrophic-Loss Index Securities,” J. of Financial Economics, Vol.71, No.1, pp. 77-111, 2004.
  10. [10] P. Barrieu and H. Loubergé, “Hybrid CAT Bonds,” J. of Risk and Insurance, Vol.76, No.3, pp. 547-578, 2009.
  11. [11] M. Nell and A. Richter, “Improving Risk Allocation through Indexed CAT Bonds,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Vol.29, No.2, pp. 183-201, 2004.
  12. [12] A. Subramanian and J. Wang, “Catastrophe Risk Transfer,” Working Paper, Georgia State University, 2014.
  13. [13] R. Gibson, M. A. Habib, and A. Ziegler, “Reinsurance or Securitization: The Case of Natural Catastrophe Risk,” J. of Mathematical Economics, Vol.53, pp. 79-100, 2014.
  14. [14] A. Subrahmanyam, “A Theory of Trading in Stock Index Futures,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 17-51, 1991.
  15. [15] U. Bhattacharya, P. J. Reny, and M. Spiegel, “Destructive Interference in an Imperfectly Competitive Multi-Security Market,” J. of Economic Theory, Vol.65, No.1, pp. 136-170, 1995.
  16. [16] U. Bhattacharya and M. Spiegel, “Insiders, Outsiders, and Market Breakdowns,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 255-282, 1991.
  17. [17] R. Rahi, “Adverse Selection and Security Design,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.63, No.2, pp. 287-300, 1996.
  18. [18] K. Ohashi, “Security Innovation on Several Assets under Asymmetric Information,” Japanese Economic Review, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 75-95, 1999.
  19. [19] J. M. Marin and R. Rahi, “Speculative Securities,” Economic Theory, Vol.14, No.3, pp. 653-668, 1999.
  20. [20] F. Allen and D. Gale, “Financial Innovation and Risk Sharing,” MIT Press, 1994.
  21. [21] P. DeMarzo and D. Duffie, “A Liquidity-Based Model of Security Design,” Econometrica, Vol.67, No.1, pp. 65-90, 1999.
  22. [22] D. Duffie and R. Rahi, “Financial Market Innovation and Security Design: An Introduction,” J. of Economic Theory, Vol.65, No.1, pp. 1-42, 1995.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 19, 2024