The Global Centre for Disaster Statistics (GCDS) in Tohoku University was established in April 2015. One of its main missions is to support the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) in the monitoring and evaluation of progress by providing support at a national level for building the capacity to develop nationwide statistics on disaster damage and by establishing an improved global database for such statistics. The objective of this study was to find clues for the effective measurement of disaster damage utilizing disaster statistics. In disaster loss databases, we often encounter so many observed variables that it is difficult to establish how severe each disaster was in total. Thus, it was considered that introducing a whole new compound indicator to estimate the scale of each disaster properly would be beneficial. In this context, the authors conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) to introduce new compound indicators. The material data for the analysis were retrieved via the global disaster-related database (GDB) provided by the GCDS. Consequently, it was posited that the score of the first principal component, calculated by a PCA, could be an effective indicator to estimate the specific impact of a disaster. We believe that the findings and proposal of a new indicator in this study will contribute to the literature in that new clues to establish an evidence-based criteria and threshold of disaster data collection are provided.

1. [1] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,” 2015.
2. [2] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), “Technical Guidance for Monitoring and Reporting on Progress in Achieving the Global Targets of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction,” 2017.
3. [3] T. Ito, M. Miyamoto, and Y. Ono, “Strengthening Governance on Disaster Risk Reduction Through Improved Disaster Damage Statistics,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.3, pp. 470-475, 2016.
4. [4] D. Sasaki and Y. Ono, “Overview of the Special Issue on the Development of Disaster Statistics,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1002-1006, 2018.
5. [5] Y. Ono, “Process in Which Targets Were Incorporated in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, Current Discussion on Setting Terminology and Indicators of the Framework, and the Linkage with Global Centre for Disaster Statistics,” Trends in the Sciences, Vol.21, No.3, pp. 94-102, 2016 (in Japanese).
6. [6] D. Sasaki, K. Moriyama, and Y. Ono, “Hidden Common Factors in Disaster Loss Statistics: A Case Study Analyzing the Data of Nepal,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1032-1038, 2018.
7. [7] Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), https://www.emdat.be/frequently-asked-questions [accessed June 16, 2019]
8. [8] H. Hotelling, “Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components,” J. of Educational Psychology, Vol.24, No.6, pp. 417-441, 1933.
9. [9] S. Wold, K. Esbensen, and P. Geladi, “Principal component analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol.2, Issues 1-3, pp. 37-52, 1987.
10. [10] D. Sasaki, K. Moriyama, and Y. Ono, “Dimensionality reduction for disaster statistics: A case study in Indonesia disaster database,” 57th Research Meeting on Civil Engineering Planning, 2018.
11. [11] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), “The 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction,” 2015.