Various studies have examined soil liquefaction and the resultant structure damage. The 1995 Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake, a near-field earthquake, caused significant damage when the ground was liquified due to the rapidly increased pore water pressure in several cycles of major motions. Therefore, the effect of pore water movement during earthquakes has been assumed to be limited, and liquefaction has mainly been evaluated in undrained conditions. Additionally, the ground and building settlement or inclination caused by liquefaction are deemed to result from pore water drainage after earthquakes. Meanwhile, in the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake, off the Pacific Coast, a subduction-zone earthquake, long-duration motions were observed for over 300 s with frequent aftershocks. Long-duration motions with frequent aftershocks are also anticipated in a future Nankai Trough Earthquake. The effect of pore water movement not only after but during an earthquake should be considered in cases where pore water pressure gradually increases in long-duration motion. The movement of pore water during and after an earthquake typically results in simultaneous dissipation and buildup of water pressure, as well as volumetric changes associated with settlement and lateral spreading. Such effects must reasonably be considered in liquefaction evaluation and building damage prediction. This research focuses on pore water seepage into the unsaturated surface layer caused by the movement of pore water. Seepage experiments were performed based on parameters such as height of test ground, ground surface permeability, and liquefaction duration. In the tests, water pressure when the saturated ground below the groundwater level is fully liquified was applied to the bottom of the specimen representing an unsaturated surface layer. Seepage behaviors into the unsaturated surface layer were then evaluated based on the experiment data. The results show that the water level rises due to pore water seepage from the liquefied ground into the unsaturated surface layer right above the liquefied ground. For this reason, a ground shallower than the original groundwater level can be liquified.

1. [1] Japan Road Association, “Specifications for Highway Bridges,” 2012.
2. [2] The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, “Technical Standards and Commentaries for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan,” 2009.
3. [3] Architectural Institute of Japan, “Recommendations for Design of Building Foundations,” 3rd Edition, 2019 (in Japanese).
4. [4] S. Yasuda, I. Towhata, I. Ishii, S. Sato, and T. Uchimura, “Liquefaction-Induced Damage to Structures During the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake,” J. of JSCE, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 181-193, 2013.
5. [5] N. Yoshida, Y. Ohya, S. Sawada, and S. Nakamura, “Simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential under ocean trench type long period earthquake,” J. of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.9, No.3, pp. 28-47, 2009 (in Japanese).
6. [6] H. Suzuki, K. Tokimatsu, M. Sato, and K. Tabata, “Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Ground Through Multi-Dimensional Shaking Table Tests Using E-Defense Facility,” The 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), 2008.
7. [7] R. Motamed, I. Towhata, T. Honda, K. Tabata, and A. Abe, “Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-Defense large shake table test,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.51, pp. 35-46, 2013.
8. [8] H. Itoh, E. Kohama, T. Sugano, R. Terada, H. Nishi, Y. Kawamata, K. Tsurugasaki, J. Miyamoto, and H. Kokusho, “Large-scale shake table test and numerical analysis of seawall seismic countermeasures for coastal reclaimed areas and peripheral facilities,” Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (ICEGE 2019), pp. 3078-3085, 2019.
9. [9] Y. Umehara, K. Zen, and K. Hamada, “Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction Potentials in Partially Drained Conditions,” Soils and Foundations, Vol.25, No.2, pp. 57-72, 1985.
10. [10] M. Okamura and F. C. Nelson, “Liquefaction Assessment of Thin Sand Layers with Partially Drained Condition,” Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (6ICEGE), 2015.
11. [11] J. Wang, M. Sato, N. Yoshida, H. Kurose, and K. Ozeki, “Liquefaction Analysis of Seawall Structures Under Both Drained and Undrained Conditions,” 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE), 2000.
12. [12] O. Adamidis and S. P. G. Madabhushi, “Experimental investigation of drainage during earthquake-induced liquefaction,” Géotechnique, Vol.68, Issue 8, pp. 655-665, 2018.
13. [13] K. Ishihara and M. Yoshimine, “Evaluation of Settlement in Sand Deposits Following Liquefaction During Earthquakes,” Soils and Foundations, Vol.32, No.1, pp. 173-188, 1992.
14. [14] N. Sento, M. Kazama, R. Uzuoka, H. Ohmura, and M. Ishimaru, “Possibility of Postliquefaction Flow Failure due to Seepage,” J. of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.130, Issue 7, pp. 707-716, 2004.
15. [15] H. Nakazawa, K. Ishihara, Y. Tsukamoto, and T. Kamata, “Investigation of In-situ Elastic Wave Velocity for Assessment of Liquefaction,” Proc. of JSCE C, Vol.62, No.2, pp. 346-359, 2006.
16. [16] Architectural Institute of Japan, “Recommendations for Design of Small Building Foundations,” 2008.