JDR Vol.15 No.5 pp. 645-654
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0645


Repeating Earthquakes Along the Colombian Subduction Zone

Juan Carlos Bermúdez-Barrios and Hiroyuki Kumagai

Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University
Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan

Corresponding author

February 28, 2020
June 1, 2020
August 1, 2020
repeating earthquakes, waveform correlation, subduction, interplate coupling

Colombia is tectonically active, and several large earthquakes have ruptured the Colombia-Ecuador subduction zone (CESZ) during the last century. Among them, the Colombia-Ecuador earthquake in 1906 (Mw 8.4) and the Tumaco earthquake in 1979 (Mw 8.3) generated destructive tsunamis. Therefore, it is important to characterize the seismic rupture processes and their relation with interplate coupling along the CESZ. We searched for repeating earthquakes by performing waveform similarity analysis. Cross correlation (CC) values were computed between earthquake pairs with hypocenter differences of less than 50 km that were located in the northern CESZ (1°–4°N) and that occurred from June 1993 to February 2018. We used broadband and short-period seismic waveform data from the Servicio Geológico Colombiano (SGC) seismic network. A CC threshold value of 0.90 was used to identify the waveform similarity and select repeating earthquakes. We found repeating earthquakes distributed near the trench and the coast. Our estimated repeating earthquakes near the trench suggest that the interplate coupling in this region is low. This is in clear constrast to the occurrence of a large slip in the 1906 Colombia-Ecuador earthquake along the trench in the southern part of the CESZ, and suggests that rupture modes are different between the northern and southern parts of CESZ near the trench.

Cite this article as:
J. Bermúdez-Barrios and H. Kumagai, “Repeating Earthquakes Along the Colombian Subduction Zone,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15 No.5, pp. 645-654, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] E. A. Toto and J. N. Kellogg, “Structure of the Sinu-San Jacinto fold belt – an active accretionary prism in northern Colombia,” J. of South American Earth Sciences, Vol.5, Issue 2, pp. 211-222, doi: 10.1016/0895-9811(92)90039-2, 1992.
  2. [2] O. J. Pérez, M. A. Jaimes, and E. Garciacaro, “Microseismicity evidence for subduction of the Caribbean plate beneath the South American Plate in northwestern Venezuela,” J. of Geophysical Research, Vol.102, Issue B8, pp. 17875-17881, doi: 10.1029/96JB03174, 1997.
  3. [3] R. Trenkamp, J. N. Kellogg, J. T. Freymueller, and H. P. Mora, “Wide plate margin deformation, southern Central America and northwestern South America, CASA GPS observations,” J. of South American Earth Sciences, Vol.15, Issue 2, pp. 157-171, doi: 10.1016/S0895-9811(02)00018-4, 2002.
  4. [4] J. M. Londoño, S. Quintero, K. Vallejo, F. Muñoz, and J. Romero, “Seismicity of Valle Medio del Magdalena basin, Colombia,” J. of South American Earth Sciences, Vol.92, pp. 565-585, doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.04.003, 2019.
  5. [5] H. Mora-Páez et al., “Crustal deformation in the northern Andes – A new GPS velocity field,” J. of South American Earth Sciences, Vol.89, pp. 76-91, doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2018.11.002, 2019.
  6. [6] J. L. Sennson and S. L. Beck, “Historical 1942 Ecuador and 1942 Peru subduction earthquakes, and earthquake cycles along Colombia-Ecuador and Peru subduction segments,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol.146, No.1, pp. 67-101, doi: 10.1007/BF00876670, 1996.
  7. [7] C. Mendoza and J. W. Dewey, “Seismicity associated with the great Colombia-Ecuador earthquakes of 1942, 1958, and 1979: Implications for barrier models of earthquake rupture,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.74, No.2, pp. 577-593, 1984.
  8. [8] M. Yoshimoto et al., “Depth-dependent rupture mode along the Ecuador-Colombia subduction zone,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.44, Issue 5, pp. 2203-2210, doi: 10.1002/2016GL071929, 2017.
  9. [9] H. Kanamori and K. C. McNally, “Variable rupture mode of the subduction zone along the Ecuador-Colombia coast,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.72, No.4, pp. 1241-1253, 1982.
  10. [10] M. Chlieh et al., “Distribution of discrete seismic asperities and aseismic slip along the Ecuadorian megathrust,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol.400, pp. 292-301, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.027, 2014.
  11. [11] T. Sagiya and H. Mora-Páez, “Interplate Coupling along the Nazca Subduction Zone on the Pacific Coast of Colombia Deduced from GeoRED GPS Observation Data,” J. Gómez and A. O. Pinila-Pachon (Eds.), “The Geology of Colombia,” Vol.4, pp. 615-661, Servicio Geológico Colombiano, doi: 10.32685/pub.esp.38.2019.15, 2019.
  12. [12] R. M. Nadeau and L. R. Johnson, “Seismological studies at Parkfield VI: Moment release rates and estimates of source parameters for small repeating earthquakes,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.88, No.3, pp. 790-814, 1998.
  13. [13] T. Matsuzawa, T. Igarashi, and A. Hasegawa, “Characteristic small-earthquake sequence off Sanriku, northeastern Honshu, Japan,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.29, Issue 11, pp. 38-1-38-4, doi: 10.1029/2001GL014632, 2002.
  14. [14] M. Bohnhoff et al., “Repeating Marmara Sea earthquakes: indication for fault creep,” Geophysical J. Int., Vol.210, Issue 1, pp. 332-339, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx169, 2017.
  15. [15] T. Igarashi, T. Matsuzawa, and A. Hasegawa, “Repeating earthquakes and interplate aseismic slip in the northeastern Japan subduction zone,” J. of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol.108, Issue B5, doi: 10.1029/2002JB001920, 2003.
  16. [16] N. Uchida, A. Hasegawa, T. Matsuzawa, and T. Igarashi, “Pre- and post-seismic slow slip on the plate boundary off Sanriku, NE Japan associated with three interplate earthquakes as estimated from small repeating earthquake data,” Tectonophysics, Vol.385, Issues 1-4, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.04.015, 2004.
  17. [17] N. Uchida and T. Matsuzawa, “Coupling coefficient, hierarchical structure, and earthquake cycle for the source area of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake inferred from small repeating earthquake data,” Earth, Planets and Space, Vol.63, Issue 7, pp. 675-679, doi: 10.5047/eps.2011.07.006, 2011.
  18. [18] A. Kato, “Slow Slip Transients Before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.9 No.3, pp. 311-316, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0311, 2014.
  19. [19] N. Uchida, “Detection of repeating earthquakes and their application in characterizing slow fault slip,” Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, Vol.6, doi: 10.1186/s40645-019-0284-z, 2019.
  20. [20] L. A. Dominguez, T. Taira, and M. A. Santoyo, “Spatiotemporal variations of characteristic repeating earthquake sequences along the Middle America Trench in Mexico,” J. of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol.121, Issue 12, pp. 8855-8870, doi: 10.1002/2016JB013242, 2016.
  21. [21] W.-C. Yu, “Shallow-Focus Repeating Earthquakes in the Tonga-Kermadec-Vanuatu Subduction Zones,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.103, No.1, pp. 463-486, doi:10.1785/0120120123, 2013.
  22. [22] G. G. R. Buchbinder and A. Sarria, “A satellite-based seismic and volcanic monitoring system for Colombia,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.84, No.5, pp. 1670-1674, 1994.
  23. [23] B. R. Lienert, E. Berg, and L. N. Frazer, “HYPOCENTER: An earthquake location method using centered, scaled, and adaptively damped least squares,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.76, No.3, pp. 771-783, 1986.
  24. [24] B. R. Lienert and J. Havskov, “A Computer Program for Locating Earthquakes Both Locally and Globally,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol.66, No.5, pp. 26-36, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.66.5.26, 1995.
  25. [25] J. Havskov and L. Ottemoller, “SeisAn Earthquake Analysis Software,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol.70, No.5, pp. 532-534, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.70.5.532, 1999.
  26. [26] A. Ojeda and J. Havskov, “Crustal structure and local seismicity in Colombia,” J. of Seismology, Vol.5, Issue 4, pp. 575-593, doi: 10.1023/A:1012053206408, 2001.
  27. [27] R. M. Nadeau, W. Foxall, and T. V. McEvilly, “Clustering and Periodic Recurrence of Microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California,” Science, Vol.267, Issue 5197, pp. 503-507, doi: 10.1126/science.267.5197.503, 1995.
  28. [28] O. Lengliné and D. Marsan, “Inferring the coseismic and postseismic stress changes caused by the 2004 Mw=6 Parkfield earthquake from variations of recurrence times of microearthquakes,” J. of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol.114, Issue B10, doi: 10.1029/2008JB006118, 2009.
  29. [29] N. Deichmann, “The relation between ME, ML and Mw in theory and numerical simulations for small to moderate earthquakes,” J. of Seismology, Vol.22, Issue 6, pp. 1645-1668, doi: 10.1007/s10950-018-9786-1, 2018.
  30. [30] L. Malagnini and I. Munafò, “On the Relationship between ML and Mw in a Broad Range: An Example from the Apennines, Italy,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.108, No.2, pp. 1018-1024, doi: 10.1785/0120170303, 2018.
  31. [31] T. C. Hanks and H. Kanamori, “A moment magnitude scale,” J. of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol.84, Issue B5, pp. 2348-2350, doi: 10.1029/JB084iB05p02348, 1979.
  32. [32] K. Shimazaki and T. Nakata, “Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.7, Issue 4, pp. 279-282, doi: 10.1029/GL007i004p00279, 1980.
  33. [33] N. Uchida and T. Matsuzawa, “Pre- and postseismic slow slip surrounding the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake rupture,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol.374, pp. 81-91, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.021, 2013.
  34. [34] M. Yoshimoto, H. Kumagai, T. Sagiya, H. Mora-Paez, and N. E. Pulido, “New view on the rupture mode along the Colombia-Ecuador subduction zone,” AGU Fall Meeting 2017, 2017.
  35. [35] M. Beyreuther et al., “ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol.81, No.3, pp. 530-533, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530, 2010.
  36. [36] T. Megies, M. Beyreuther, R. Barsch, L. Krischer, and J. Wassermann, “ObsPy – What can it do for data centers and observatories?,” Annals of Geophysics, Vol.54, No.1, pp. 47-58, doi: 10.4401/ag-4838, 2011.
  37. [37] L. Krischer et al., “ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem,” Computational Science & Discovery, Vol.8, No.1, doi: 10.1088/1749-4699/8/1/014003, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 23, 2024