JDR Vol.15 No.3 pp. 416-425
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0416


An Investigation of Socioeconomic and Land Use Influence on Car Ownership in Yangon City

Thiri Aung*,†, Kyaing*, Ko Ko Lwin**, and Yoshihide Sekimoto**

*Yangon Technological University
Insein Road, Gyogone, Insein, Yangon 11011, Myanmar

Corresponding author

**Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

July 31, 2019
February 6, 2020
March 30, 2020
car ownership, socioeconomic factors, land use, multinomial logit model, disaggregate level

Rapid growth in private vehicle ownership and usage is one of the key problems in the development of a sustainable transportation system for Yangon City. Car ownership depends on the land use patterns and socioeconomic characteristics of a city. Socioeconomic factors, including age, gender, income, house type, and family size also affect the choice of transportation mode and destination in the short and long terms, while the choice of housing location is affected in the long term. In this study, aggregate level land use data and disaggregate level individual and household data are used to determine the effects of land use and socioeconomic factors on household decisions to own zero, one, and two or more cars. This research models car ownership by the estimating multinomial logit model using SPSS (Statistical Packages for Social Sciences). The result suggests that income level, house type of a household, and the housing location have influence on car ownership in Yangon City. The car ownership level will be higher if the household number in the central business district (CBD), inner ring area, and outer ring area is increased. Increase in low income and normal income households will reduce the probability of car ownership in the suburban area.

Cite this article as:
T. Aung, Kyaing, K. Lwin, and Y. Sekimoto, “An Investigation of Socioeconomic and Land Use Influence on Car Ownership in Yangon City,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.15 No.3, pp. 416-425, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] K. I. Wong and H.-L. Lin, “Modelling household car and motorcycle ownership: a case of Macao,” Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.8, 2011.
  2. [2] P. W. Newton, “Re-shaping cities for a more sustainable future, exploring the link between urban form, air quality, energy and greenhouse gas emissions,” Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 1997.
  3. [3] H. Inaba and H. Kato, “Impacts of motorcycle demand management in Yangon, Myanmar,” Transportation Research Procedia, Vol.25, pp. 4852-4868, 2017.
  4. [4] Asian Development Bank, “Myanmar transport sector policy note: Urban transport,” 2016.
  5. [5] G. De Jong, J. Fox, A. Daly, M. Pieters, and R. Smit, “Comparison of car ownership models,” Transport Review, Vol.24, pp. 379-408, 2004.
  6. [6] Y.-L. Chu, “Automobile ownership analysis using ordered probit models,” Transportation Research Record, Vol.1805, No.1, pp. 60-67, 2002.
  7. [7] C. R. Bhat and V. Pulugurta, “A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol.32, Issue 1, pp. 61-75, 1998.
  8. [8] D. Potoglou and Y. O. Susilo, “Comparison of Vehicle-Ownership Models,” Transportation Research Record, Vol.2076, pp. 97-105, 2008.
  9. [9] J. Dargay and D. Gately, “Income’s effect on car and vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960–2015,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol.33, Issue 2, pp. 101-138, 1999.
  10. [10] M. Alqhatani, S. Bajwa, and S. Setunge, “Impact of Socioeconomic and Land Use on Car Ownership: A Comparison of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and Melbourne, Australia,” J. of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), Vol.31, pp. 539-546, 2012.
  11. [11] D. M. P. Wedagama, “A multinomial logit model for estimating the influence of household characteristics on motorcycle ownership: A case study in Denpasar city, Bali,” J. of Civil Engineering, Vol.29, No.1, 2009.
  12. [12] D. Salon, “Neighborhoods, cars, and commuting in New York City: A discrete choice approach,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol.43, Issue 2, pp. 180-196, 2009.
  13. [13] S. Choo and P. L. Mokhtarian, “What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol.38, Issue 3, pp. 201-222, 2004.
  14. [14] O. O. Joseph, E. J. Eromietse, D. S. Emmanuel, and A. Olufunke,“Multinomial logit model estimation of household characteristics influencing car ownership in Akure, South West, Nigeria,” Int. J. for Traffic and Transport Engineering (IJTTE), Vol.7, pp. 203-215, 2017.
  15. [15] D. Potoglou and P. S. Kanaroglou, “Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada,” J. of Transport Geography, Vol.16, pp. 42-54, 2008.
  16. [16] N. Tun, K. Kanitpong, P. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, and H. Kato, “Study on vehicle ownership in Yangon using household data,” 8th ATRANS Symp. on Transportation for a Better Life: Harnessing Finance for Safety and Equity in AEC, 2015.
  17. [17] M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, “Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand,” The MIT Press, 1985.
  18. [18] K. Cui, C. Shao, and G. Yao, “Modeling Household Car Ownership using Ordered Response Model,” 2018 Int. Conf. on Transportation & Logistics, Information & Communication, Smart City (TLICSC 2018), Vol.6, pp. 81-87, 2018.
  19. [19] M. Kojima, T. Futose, P. L. Binh, and H. Kato, “Yangon’s Urban Transportation: Traffic Demand and its Quality of Service,” Presented at the 11th Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2015.
  20. [20] Japan International Corporation Agency (JICA), “Project for the comprehensive urban transport plan of the Greater Yangon (YUTRA),” 2014.
  21. [21] J. D. Ortuzar and L. G. Willumsen, ”Modelling Transport,” Fourth Edition, Wiley, 2011.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 19, 2024