JDR Vol.14 No.8 pp. 1066-1071
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p1066

Survey Report:

Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship Between Livelihood Disruptions and Displacement Intentions Following a Volcanic Eruption: A Case from the 2014 Mt. Kelud Eruption

Yasuhito Jibiki*,†, Dicky Pelupessy**, and Kanako Iuchi***

*Next Generation Volcano Researcher Development Program, Tohoku University
6-3 Aza-Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan

Corresponding author

**Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

***International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan

May 31, 2019
August 23, 2019
November 1, 2019
livelihood disruption, displacement intentions, volcanic eruption, Mt. Kelud, Indonesia

The current study explores the possible relationship between livelihood disruptions and displacement intentions in the short and long term, following a volcanic eruption. Previous studies in a similar context suggest that livestock breeding and farming remain important to the affected population in terms of livelihood maintenance, even when eruptions severely interrupt these activities. Other research findings suggest people consider eruptions opportunities to improve income through increased crop cultivations. Previous studies have concluded that people prefer to return to agricultural and farming activities, even if eruptions significantly disturb them. Little research, however, quantitatively addresses the impact of eruptions on income or explores the relationship between livelihood disruption and relocation intention. To understand this relationship, we conducted a questionnaire survey of villagers in the Kediri and Blitar districts of Indonesia who received an evacuation order during the 2014 Mt. Kelud eruption. We collected and analyzed the data from 440 valid responses. One of our major findings supports earlier research findings vis-à-vis the association between agricultural losses and villagers’ decisions to relocate in the long term. Our data suggest that villagers with no relocation intention had experienced larger agricultural losses, thus suggesting that agricultural losses do not constitute a large factor affecting relocation intention. Likewise, we found there to be no statistically significant relationship between livestock damages/losses and displacement intentions. These findings suggest the importance of further research into causal relationships among economic loss, farming damages and losses, and displacement intentions.

Cite this article as:
Y. Jibiki, D. Pelupessy, and K. Iuchi, “Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship Between Livelihood Disruptions and Displacement Intentions Following a Volcanic Eruption: A Case from the 2014 Mt. Kelud Eruption,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.8, pp. 1066-1071, 2019.
Data files:
  1. [1] United Nations (UN), “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,” 2015.
  2. [2] United Nations (UN), “Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction,” 2016.
  3. [3] S. Andreastuti, E. T. Paripurno, H. Gunawan, A. Budianto, D. Syahbana, and J. Pallister, “Character of community response to volcanic crises at Sinabung and Kelud volcanoes,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.01.022, 2017.
  4. [4] É. De Bélizal, F. Lavigne, J. C. Gaillard, D. Grancher, I. Pratomo, and J.-C. Komorowski, “The 2007 eruption of Kelut volcano (East Java, Indonesia): Phenomenology, crisis management and social response,” Geomorphology, Vol.136, Issue 1, pp. 165-175, 2012.
  5. [5] K. Donovan, “Doing social volcanology: exploring volcanic culture in Indonesia,” Area, Vol.42, Issue 1, pp. 117-126, 2010.
  6. [6] J.-C. Gaillard and C. J. L. Dibben, “Volcanic risk perception and beyond,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.172, Issue 3-4, pp. 163-169, 2008.
  7. [7] S. Herminingrum and E. Junining, “Socio-Cultural Life of Kelud People in Connecting with Traditional Mitigation Efforts Based on Local Wisdom,” Int. J. of Social and Local Economic Governance, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 127-135, 2016.
  8. [8] F. Lavigne, B. De Coster, N. Juvin, F. Flohic, J.-C. Gaillard, P. Texier, J. Morin, and J. Sartohadi, “People’s behaviour in the face of volcanic hazards: Perspectives from Javanese communities, Indonesia,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.172, Issue 3-4, pp. 273-287, 2008.
  9. [9] E. T. W. Mei, F. Lavigne, A. Picquout, E. de Bélizal, D. Brunstein, D. Grancher, J. Sartohadi, N. Cholic, and C. Vidal, “Lessons learned from the 2010 evacuations at Merapi volcano,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.261, pp. 348-365, 2013.
  10. [10] I. Kelman and T. A. Mather, “Living with volcanoes: The sustainable livelihoods approach for volcano-related opportunities,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.172, Issue 3-4, pp. 189-198, 2008.
  11. [11] UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), “Indonesia: Mt. Kelud Volcano – Feb 2014,” [accessed May 15, 2019]
  12. [12] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB), “Atlas bencana Indonesia 2014,” 2015 (in Indonesian).
  13. [13] International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), “Final report Indonesia: Volcanic Eruption – Mt. Kelud,” 2014, [accessed May 13, 2019]
  14. [14] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kediri, “Kabupaten Kedri Dalam Angka 2014 (Kediri Regency in Figure 2014),” 2014 (in Indonesian).
  15. [15] ProFauna, “ProFauna’s Assessment result of the Impact of Mt. Kelud’s Eruption on Animals,” 2014, [accessed May 13, 2019]
  16. [16] The Japan Times, “Indonesian volcano brings life as well as death,” 2014, [accessed May 14, 2019]
  17. [17] L. Setiawan, R. Ratnawati, and R. Lestari, “Phenomenology Study: Resilience Experience of Farmer After Eruption of Kelud Mountain in 2014 in Puncu Village of Puncu District Kediri District,” NurseLine J., Vol.2, No.2, pp. 97-108, 2017.
  18. [18] Y. Nakashima, K. Heki, A. Takeo, M. N. Cahyadi, A. Aditiya, and K. Yoshizawa, “Atmospheric resonant oscillations by the 2014 eruption of the Kelud volcano, Indonesia, observed with the ionospheric total electron contents and seismic signals,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol.434, pp. 112-116, 2016.
  19. [19] R. A. Dare, D. H. Smith, and M. J. Naughton, “Ensemble Prediction of the Dispersion of Volcanic Ash from the 13 February 2014 Eruption of Kelut, Indonesia,” J. of Applied Meteorogy and Climatology, Vol.55, No.1, pp. 61-78, 2016.
  20. [20] N. I. Kristiansen, A. J. Prata, A. Stohl, and S. A. Carn, “Stratospheric volcanic ash emissions from the 13 February 2014 Kelut eruption,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.42, Issue 2, pp. 588-596, 2015.
  21. [21] S. Nakada, A. Zaennudin, F. Maeno, M. Yoshimoto, and N. Hokanishi, “Credibility of Volcanic Ash Thicknesses Reported by the Media and Local Residents Following the 2014 Eruption of Kelud Volcano, Indonesia,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 53-59, 2016.
  22. [22] P. Lesage and Surono, “Seismic precursors of the February 10, 1990 eruption of Kelut volcano, Java,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.65, Issue 1-2, pp. 135-146, 1995.
  23. [23] J.-L. Bourdier, I. Pratomo, J.-C. Thouret, G. Boudon, and P. M. Vincent, “Observations, stratigraphy and eruptive processes of the 1990 eruption of Kelut volcano, Indonesia,” J. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.79, Issue 3-4, pp. 181-203, 1997.
  24. [24] K. Ishihara, Surono, M. Hendrasto, and S. Hidayati, “Long-term Forecasting of Volcanic Eruption in Case of Kelud Volcano, Indonesia,” Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Vol.54 B, pp. 209-214, 2011 (in Japanese with English Abstract).
  25. [25] Y. Jibiki, D. Pelupessy, N. Sekiya, and A. Tanaka, “Designing Suitable Information Dissemination Against Natural Disasters: From the Case Study of Mt. Kelud Eruption in 2007 in East Java, Indonesia,” D. Mardiatno and M. Takahashi (Eds.), “Community Approach to Disaster,” pp. 181-192, Gadjah Mada University Press, 2012.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 10, 2019