single-dr.php

JDR Vol.14 No.5 pp. 798-809
(2019)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0798

Paper:

Integrated Monitoring of Volcanic Ash and Forecasting at Sakurajima Volcano, Japan

Masato Iguchi*1,†, Haruhisa Nakamichi*1, Hiroshi Tanaka*2, Yusaku Ohta*3, Atsushi Shimizu*4, and Daisuke Miki*1

*1Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University
1722-19 Sakurajima-Yokoyama-cho, Kagoshima 891-1419, Japan

Corresponding author

*2University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

*3Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan

*4National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan

Received:
February 8, 2019
Accepted:
May 9, 2019
Published:
August 1, 2019
Keywords:
volcanic ash, XMP radar, lidar, vulcanian eruption, Sakurajima volcano
Abstract

The Sakurajima volcano is characterized by frequent vulcanian eruptions at the Minamidake or Showa crater in the summit area. We installed an integrated monitoring system for the detection of volcanic ash (composed of remote sensing sensors XMP radars, lidar, and GNSS with different wave lengths) and 13 optical disdrometers on the ground covering all directions from the crater to measure drop size distribution and falling velocity. Campaign sampling of volcanic ash supports the conversion of particle counts measured by the disdrometer to the weight of volcanic ash. Seismometers and tilt/strain sensors were used to estimate the discharge rate of volcanic ash from the vents. XMP radar can detect volcanic ash clouds even under visual difficulty because of weather such as fog or clouds. A vulcanian eruption on November 13 was the largest event at the Sakurajima volcano in 2017; however, the volcanic plume was not visible due to clouds covering the summit. Radar revealed that the volcanic plume reached an elevation of 4.2–6.2 km. Post-fit phase residuals (PPR) from the GNSS analysis increased suddenly after the eruption, and large-PPR paths from the satellites to the ground-based receivers intersected each other at an elevation of 4.2 km. The height of the volcanic plume was also estimated from the discharge rate of volcanic ash to be 4.5 km, which is empirically related to seismic energy and the deflation volume obtained via ground deformation monitoring. Using the PUFF model, the weight of the ash-fall deposit was accurately forecast in the main direction of transport of the volcanic ash, which was verified by disdrometers. For further advances in forecasting of the ash-fall deposit, we must consider high-resolution wind field, shape of volcanic plume as the initial value, and the particle number distribution along the volcanic plume.

Cite this article as:
M. Iguchi, H. Nakamichi, H. Tanaka, Y. Ohta, A. Shimizu, and D. Miki, “Integrated Monitoring of Volcanic Ash and Forecasting at Sakurajima Volcano, Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.5, pp. 798-809, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] S. Onodera, M. Iguchi, and K. Ishihara, “Prevention and mitigation of aircraft accidents caused by volcanic eruption,” Annuals Disaster Prevention Research Institute, No.40 B-1, pp. 73-81, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  2. [2] S. E. Hillman, C. J. Horwell, A. L. Densmore, D. E. Damby, B. Fubini, Y. Ishimine, and M. Tomatis, “Sakurajima volcano: a physico-chemical study of the health consequences of long-term exposure to volcanic ash,” Bull. of Volcanol., Vol.74, Issue 4, pp. 913-930, doi:10.1007/s00445-012-0575-3, 2012.
  3. [3] H. L. Tanaka and K. Yamamoto, “Numerical simulation of volcanic plume dispersal from Usu volcano in Japan on 31 March 2000 using PUFF model,” Earth, Planets and Space, Vol.54, Issue 7, pp. 743-752, 2002.
  4. [4] H. L. Tanaka and M. Iguchi, “Numerical simulations of volcanic ash plume dispersal for Sakura-Jima using real-time emission rate estimation,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.1, pp. 160-172, doi:10.20965/jdr.2019.p0160, 2019.
  5. [5] M. Iguchi, “Method for real-time evaluation of discharge rate of volcanic ash – Case study on intermittent eruptions at the Sakurajima volcano, Japan –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 4-14, 2016.
  6. [6] A. P. Poulidis, T. Takemi, M. Iguchi, and I. A. Renfrew, “Orographic effects on the transport and deposition of volcanic ash: A case study of Mount Sakurajima, Japan,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres, Vol.122, Issue 17, pp. 9332-9350, doi:10.1002/2017JD026595, 2017.
  7. [7] W. C. Skamarock, J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, M. G. Duda, X.-Y. Huang, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, “A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3,” NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-4751+STR, 2008.
  8. [8] A. Folch, A. Costa, and G. Macedonio, “FALL3D: A computational model for transport and deposition of volcanic ash,” Computers & Geosciences, Vol.35, Issue 6, pp. 1334-1342, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.008, 2009.
  9. [9] A. P. Poulidis, T. Takemi, and M. Iguchi, “Experimental high-resolution forecasting of volcanic ash hazard at Sakurajima, Japan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.5, 2019.
  10. [10] C. Bonadonna, M. Pistolesi, R. Cioni, W. Degruyter, M. Elissondo, and V. Baumann, “Dynamics of wind-affected volcanic plumes: The example of the 2011 Cordón Caulle eruption, Chile,” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, Vol.120, Issue 4, pp. 2242-2261, doi:10.1002/2014JB011478, 2015.
  11. [11] A. Shimizu, N. Sugimoto, I. Matsui, K. Arao, I. Uno, T. Murayama, N. Kagawa, K. Aoki, A. Uchiyama, and A. Yamazaki, “Continuous observations of Asian dust and other aerosols by polarization lidars in China and Japan during ACE-Asia,” J. Geophysical Research, Vol.109, Issue D19, D19S17, doi:10.1029/2002JD003253, 2004.
  12. [12] K. Sassen, J. Zhu, P. Webley, K. Dean, and P. Cobb, “Volcanic ash plume identification using polarization lidar: Augustine eruption, Alaska,” Geophys. Res. Let., Vol.34, Issue 8, L08803, doi:10.1029/2006GL027237, 2007.
  13. [13] S. Oishi, M. Iida, M. Muranishi, M. Ogawa, R. I. Hapsari, and M. Iguchi, “Mechanism of volcanic tephra falling detected by X-band multi-parameter radar,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 43-52, 2016.
  14. [14] R. Grapenthin, J. T. Freymueller, and A. M. Kaufman, “Geodetic observations during the 2009 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Research, Vol.259, pp. 115-132, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.04.021, 2013.
  15. [15] K. M. Larson, “A new way to detect volcanic plumes,” Geophys. Res. Let., Vol.40, Issue 11, pp. 2657-2660, doi:10.1002/grl.50556, 2013.
  16. [16] Y. Ohta and M. Iguchi, “Advective diffusion of volcanic plume captured by dense GNSS network around Sakurajima volcano: a case study of the vulcanian eruption on July 24, 2012,” Earth, Planets and Space, Vol.67, Article No.157, doi:10.1186/s40623-015-0324-x, 2015.
  17. [17] M. Iguchi, “Volcanic activity of Sakurajima monitored using Global Navigation Satellite System,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.3, pp. 518-525, doi:10.20965/jdr.2018.p0518, 2018.
  18. [18] Y. Tajima, D. Ohara, K. Fukuda, and S. Shimomura, “Development of automatic tephrometer for monitoring of volcano,” Nippon Koei Technical Forum, No.23, pp. 39-46, 2015 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  19. [19] T. Kozono, T. Miwa, M. Maki, T. Maesaka, D. Miki, and M. Iguchi, “PARSIVEL Tephra-fall observations at Sakurajima volcano,” Annuals Disaster Prevention Research Institute, No.58 B, pp. 86-90, 2015 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  20. [20] K. Ishihara, “Pressure sources and induced ground deformation associated with explosive eruptions at an andesitic volcano: Sakurajima volcano, Japan,” M. P. Ryan (Ed.), “Magma Transport and Storage,” John Wiley & Sons, pp. 335-356, 1990.
  21. [21] M. Iguchi and K. Ishihara, “Comparison of earthquakes and air-shocks accompanied with explosive eruptions at Sakurajima and Suwanosejima volcanoes,” Annuals Disaster Prevention Research Institute, No.33 B-1, pp. 1-12, 1990 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  22. [22] H. L. Tanaka, M. Iguchi, and S. Nakata, “Numerical simulations of volcanic ash plume dispersal from Kelud volcano in Indonesia on February 13, 2014,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.1, pp. 31-42, 2016.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 21, 2019