single-dr.php

JDR Vol.14 No.4 pp. 623-629
(2019)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0623

Review:

Conveying Volcano Information Effectively to Stakeholders – A New Project for Promotion of Next Generation Volcano Research

Setsuya Nakada, Yousuke Miyagi, Tomohiro Kubo, and Eisuke Fujita

National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED)
3-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
January 24, 2019
Accepted:
March 20, 2019
Published:
June 1, 2019
Keywords:
Next Generation Volcano Research Promotion project, emergence observation, forecasting eruption, countermeasure technology and information tools
Abstract

A new program for the Next Generation Volcano Research and Human Resource Development started in 2016, following the government’s analysis of a volcanic disaster at Mount Ontake in 2014. One of its important purposes is the development of a technology that can provide visualized information of imminent volcanic hazards to the stakeholders. The latter include researchers in the Volcano Disaster Prevention Councils. Since the volcanic activity in Japan has been relatively less in the past few hundred years, larger eruptions are certainly expected to occur in the near future. Volcanic risk management has developed in Japan independently of university or institutional research, and by a national law, researchers are not allowed to officially forecast imminent volcanic eruptions. In the case of large eruptions never being observed, a close communication between the Japan Meteorological Agency and researchers becomes very important. Our project goal is issuing effective information on real-time observational and hazard mitigation simulation data to the stakeholders and researchers. Based on our inspection and interviews we develop information tools using which the above data are provided effectively and the dissemination and education of volcanic disasters are performed.

Cite this article as:
S. Nakada, Y. Miyagi, T. Kubo, and E. Fujita, “Conveying Volcano Information Effectively to Stakeholders – A New Project for Promotion of Next Generation Volcano Research,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.4, pp. 623-629, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] F. Maeno, S. Nakada, T. Oikawa, M. Yoshimoto, J. Komori, Y. Ishizuka, Y. Takeshita, T. Shimano, T. Kaneko, and M. Nagai, “Reconstruction of phreatic eruption on 27 September 2014 at Ontake volcano, central Japan, based on proximal pyroclastic density current and fallout deposits,” Earth Planets Space, Vol.68, pp. 82, 2016.
  2. [2] T. Oikawa, M. Yoshimoto, S. Nakada, F. Maeno, J. Komori, T. Shimano, Y. Takeshita, Y. Ishizuka, and Y. Yoshimine, “Reconstruction of the 2014 eruption sequence of Ontake Volcano from recorded images and interviews,” Earth Planets Space, Vol.68, pp. 79, 2016.
  3. [3] M. Yoshimoto, R. Honda, J. Komori, Y. Ishimine, and H. Yamada, “Preliminary report on damage caused by the ballistic ejecta of the 2018 phreatic eruption of Motoshirane volcano,” Abstract of 2018 annual meeting, Japan Geoscience Union, SVE40-11, 2018 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] C. G. Newhall and S. Self, “The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI): an estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism,” J. Geophys. Res., Vol.87, No.C2, pp. 1231-1238, 1982.
  5. [5] S. Nakada, “Regularity of volcanic eruptions in terms of volcanic explosivity index (VEI),” Bull. Volcanol. Soc. Japan, Vol.60, pp. 143-150, 2015 (in Japanese with English abstract and captions).
  6. [6] S. Hidayati, H. Triastuty, I. Mulyana, S. Adi, K. Ishihara, A. Basuki, H. Kuswandarto, B. Priyanto, and A. Solikhin, “Differences in the seismicity preceding the 2007 and 2014 eruptions of Kelud volcano, Indonesia,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.10.017, 2018.
  7. [7] H. Ueda, T. Yamada, T. Miwa, M. Nagai, and T. Matsuzawa, “Development of a Data Sharing System for Japan Volcanological Data Network,” J. Disast. Res., Vol.14, No.4, 2019.
  8. [8] E. Fujita, Y. Iriyama, T. Shimbori, E. Sato, K. Ishii, Y. J. Suzuki, K. Tsunematsu, and K. Kiyosugi, “Evaluating Volcanic Hazard Risk Through Numerical Simulations,” J. Disast. Res., Vol.14, No.4, 2019.
  9. [9] T. M. Wilson, C. Steward, V. Sword-Daniels, G. S. Leonard, D. M. Johnston, J. W. Cole, J. Wardman, G. Wilson, and S. T. Barnard, “Volcanic ash impacts on critical infrastructure,” Physics Chemistry Earth, Vol.45-46, pp. 5-23, 2012.
  10. [10] T. Kubo, Y. Miyagi, M. Miyamura, A. Nobata, K. Otsuka, and H. Suwa, “On impacts of volcanic ash to building facilities,” Kenchiku Bosai (J. of the Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association), Vol.2018, No.12, pp. 45-52, 2018 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 10, 2019