single-dr.php

JDR Vol.12 No.1 pp. 106-117
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0106
(2017)

Paper:

Exposure of Population and Energy-Related Base Facilities to Shaking Intensity Predicted for Nankai Megathrust Earthquakes

Nobuoto Nojima and Hiroki Kato

Department of Civil Engineering, Gifu University
1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
August 7, 2016
Accepted:
December 13, 2016
Published:
February 1, 2017
Keywords:
Nankai megathrust earthquakes, exposure to shaking intensity, population, energy-related facilities, capacities of facilities
Abstract

The exposure of the area and population as well as energy-related base facilities to the shaking intensity predicted for the anticipated megathrust earthquakes along the Nankai Trough subduction zones is evaluated. First, area and population exposure is evaluated considering six cases of shaking intensity distribution calculated using strong motion prediction methods and an attenuation formula. Next, the exposure of energy-related base facilities is evaluated for power generation plants, oil refineries, and LNG terminals in terms of their capacities for power generation, oil refining, and storage, respectively. Exposed capacities can be evaluated approximately for arbitrary levels of shaking intensity, providing fundamental information on the potential reduction of energy supply capabilities in an earthquake disaster.

References
  1. [1] Tohoku Electric Power Company, “Emergency information: Perspective of restoration from The 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” March 11-April 25, 2011, http://www.tohoku-epco.co.jp/emergency/9/index.html [accessed May 27, 2011, in Japanese]
  2. [2] Tokyo Electric Power Company, “Press release: Impacts of restoration from The 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” March 11-April 25, 2011, http://www.tepco.co.jp/index-j.html [accessed May 27, 2011, in Japanese]
  3. [3] The Japan Gas Association, “Suspension of city gas supply due to The 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” March 11 (No.2) – April 25 (No.51), 2011, http://www.gas.or.jp/default.html [accessed May 27, 2011, in Japanese]
  4. [4] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Industrial Structure Council, Preservation Group Discussion, Electricity Security Subcommittee, “Interim Report,” 48p., 2014 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] Japan Nuclear Technology Institute (JANTI), Operation Status, July 2016, http://www.gengikyo.jp/facility/powerplant.html [accessed July 29, 2016, in Japanese]
  6. [6] The Cabinet Office, The Anticipated Nankai Megathrust Earthquake Model Investigation Group, “About strong motion fault model and distribution of seismic intensity (The second report),” August 2012. http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/chubou/nankai_trough/pdf/20120829_2nd_report05.pdf [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  7. [7] The Cabinet Office, The Anticipated Nankai Megathrust Earthquake Model Investigation Group, “About tsunami fault model, tunami heights and inundated Area (The second report),” August 2012, http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/chubou/nankai_trough/pdf/20120829_2nd_report01.pdf [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  8. [8] Mitsubishi Research Institute, “FY2014 Report on earthquake resistant electric power facilities (Investigation on simulation of electric power demand and supply in disaster),” February 2015, http://www.data.go.jp/data/dataset/meti_20160328_0069 [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  9. [9] N. Nojima and H. Kato, “Assessment of tsunami inundation exposure of energy-related base facilities caused by anticipated Nankai Megathrust Earthquakes,” Proc. of the Seventh China-Japan-US Trilateral Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Shanghai, China, June 1-4, 2016.
  10. [10] N. Nojima and H. Kato, “Exposure assessment of energy-related facilities due to the Nankai Megathrust Earthquakes,” Proc. of the 14th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp. 267-274, December 2014 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistics Bureau, “2005 Census,” http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kokusei/2010/index.htm [accessed September 20, 2012, in Japanese]
  12. [12] N. Nojima, S. Fujikawa, Y. Ishikawa, T. Okumura, H. Fujiwara and N. Morikawa, “Exposure analysis using the probabilistic seismic hazard maps for Japan,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.8, No.5, pp.861-868, 2013.
  13. [13] N. Nojima, H. Fujiwara, N. Morikawa, Y. Ishikawa, T. Okumura and J. Miyakoshi,“Seismic risk assessment of active faults in Japan in terms of population exopsure to seismic intensity,” Journal of Japn Association for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.10, No.2, pp. 22-40, 2010 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] N. Nojima, M. Sugito and M. Kuse, “Macroscopic assessment of seismic disaster potential in terms of population exposure to seismic intensity,” Proc. of the Third Taiwan-Japan Workshop on Lifeline Performance and Disaster Mitigation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 251-258, May 2004.
  15. [15] The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan: Share of electric power energy by types of generation, June 2012. http://www.fepc.or.jp/about_us/pr/sonota/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/06/13/kouseihi_2011.pdf [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  16. [16] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, National and Regional Policy Bureau. “National Land Numerical Information Download,” 2013, http://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj/index.html [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  17. [17] JUNTUNET21 : JUNTUNET21Website, Statistical material No.1, List of refining capacities of oil refineries as of April 1, 2010, http://www.juntsu.co.jp/jouhou/toukei/toukei1.html [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  18. [18] Wikipedia, “List of LNG terminals in Japan,” 2015. http://ja.wikipedia.org/ [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  19. [19] Google map, http://maps.google.co.jp/ [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  20. [20] Google Earth, http://www.google.co.jp/intl/ja/earth/index.html [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  21. [21] N. Nojima, and Y. Maruyama, “An Overview of Functional Damage and Restoration Processes of Utility Lifelines in the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake, Japan,” JSCE Journal of Disaster FactSheets, FS2016-L-0004, pp. 1-12, 2016.
  22. [22] Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), “The method to calculate JMA instrumental seismic intensity,” http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/kyoshin/kaisetsu/calc_sindo.htm [accessed August 31, 2013, in Japanese]
  23. [23] K. T. Shabestari and F. Yamazaki, “A Proposal of Instrumental Seismic Intensity Scale Compatible with MMI Evaluated from Three-Component Acceleration Records,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol.17, No.4, pp. 711-723, 2001.
  24. [24] D. J. Wald, V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, and H. Kanamori “Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli intensity in California,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol.15, No.3, pp. 557-564, August 1999.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 11, 2017